Effect of macroeconomic business environment on the development of corporate social responsibility in Baltic Countries and Slovakia

Abstract

Research background: Fluctuations in economic activity forced companies to change the traditional methods of organization and management and to search for new tools, knowledge, resources and competences in order to strengthen their positions. This has particularly intensified debates on corporate social responsibility (CSR) not only between business people, but also between pieces of research,  industry leaders and government representatives. The ongoing global ecologic crisis quickened discussions about how the alternation of macroeconomic business environment influences the development of CSR.

Purpose of the article: The aim of this paper is to investigate how the changes in macroeconomic business environment influence the development of socially responsible activities in Baltic Countries and Slovakia.

Methods: A statistical analysis of secondary data was used in order to reanalyse the data for the purpose of gaining new insights. The objectives of statistical analysis in this paper were twofold: firstly, to identify the challenges in macroeconomic business environment; secondly, to explore the development of socially responsible activities in different countries. The research period covered the years 2006?2016. The choice of this period is determined by data availability.

Findings & Value added: The authors found that economic conditions may diversely affect the development of different dimensions of CSR. Even in unfavourable macroeconomic conditions companies continue to be involved in socially responsible actions because of long-run CSR benefits. The analysis is useful at an international level because it justified the development of socially responsible businesses in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia, and has provided an opportunity to assess the tendencies of CSR development during the different period of economic cycle.

Keywords

corporate social responsibility, macroeconomic business environment, economic recession, Baltic countries, Slovakia

References

1. Alves, I. M. (2009). Green spin everywhere: how greenwashing reveals the limits of the CSR paradigm. Journal of Global Change and Governance, 2(1).
   View in Google Scholar
2. Becherer, R. C., & Helms, M. M. (2014). Green goals in organizations: do small businesses engage in environmentally friendly strategies. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 24(1).
   View in Google Scholar
3. Bernatonyte, D., Vilke, R., & Keizeriene, E. (2009). Economic crisis impact direc-tions concerning corporate social responsibility in Lithuanian SMEs. Economics and Management, 14.
   View in Google Scholar
4. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
   View in Google Scholar
5. Chih, H.-L., Chih, H.-H., & Chen, T.-Y. (2010). On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: international evidence on the financial industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1). doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0186-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0186-x
   View in Google Scholar
6. Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Velthoven, B. V. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1). doi: 10.1080/0963818042000339617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000339617
   View in Google Scholar
7. Dagiliene, L., Leitoniene, S., & Grencikova, A. (2014). Increasing business trans-parency by corporate social reporting: development and problems in Lithuania. Engineering Economics, 25(1). doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.25.1.2356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.25.1.2356
   View in Google Scholar
8. Dedina, J., & Dedinova, K. (2013). The development of the corporate social re-sponsibility in companies in the Czech and Austria during last decade. Re-trieved from http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-02-4/papers/ ML13-229.pdf (11.08.2017).
   View in Google Scholar
9. European Commission (2011). Communication from the commission to the Euro-pean Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions: A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for corporate social responsibility. COM (2011): 681 final Brussels, 25.10.2011. Retrieved from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/ com _ com (2011)0681_/com _ com (2011)0681_en.pdf, (11.08.2017).
   View in Google Scholar
10. European Commission (2010). Communication from the Commission, Europe 2020: a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM (2010): 2020 final Brussels, 3.3.2010. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF, (11.08.2017).
    View in Google Scholar
11. Eurostat (2017). Statistics database. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat /tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tec00115&plugin=1, (10.12.2017).
    View in Google Scholar
12. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Retrieved from http://umich.edu/~thecore/doc/Friedman.pdf, (10.12.2017).
    View in Google Scholar
13. Frolova, I., & Lapina, I. (2015). Integration of CSR principles in quality manage-ment. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 7(2/3). doi: 10.1108/IJQSS-03-2015-0033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-03-2015-0033
    View in Google Scholar
14. Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Frias-Aceituno, J. V. (2016). Impact of the institutional macro context on the voluntary disclosure of CSR information. Long Range Planning, 49(1). doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2015.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.02.004
    View in Google Scholar
15. Ghassim, B. (2018). Sustainability-oriented innovation in the minerals industry: an empirical study on the effect of non-geographical proximity dimensions. Sus-tainability, 10(1). doi: 10.3390/su10010282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010282
    View in Google Scholar
16. Hopkins, M.; Roche, J., & Hopkins, I. (2008). Turbulent times: CRS now needed more than ever before. Retrieved from: http://mhcinternational.com/index.php? option=com_content&view=article&catid=77&id=95, (11.08.2017).
    View in Google Scholar
17. Hys, K., & Hawrysz, L. (2013). CSR in Poland as an important foundation of modern society contemporary social contexts of corporate social responsibility in Poland. Management Study. 1(1).
    View in Google Scholar
18. ISO Survey (2017). Retrieved from: http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func= ll&objId=18808772&objAction=browse&viewType=1 (10.12.2017).
    View in Google Scholar
19. Janssen, C., Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2015). Corporate crises in the age of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 58. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor. 2014.11.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.11.002
    View in Google Scholar
20. Jove-Llopis, E., & Segarra-Blasco, A. (2018). Eco-efficiency actions and firm growth in European SMEs. Sustainability, 10(1). doi: 10.3390/su10010281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010281
    View in Google Scholar
21. Kovaliov, R., Subonyte, J., & Simanaviciene, T. (2010). The influence of macroe-conomic environment of business to CSR in Lithuania. Economics and Man-agement, 15.
    View in Google Scholar
22. Kowalska, K. (2016). Network organizations and corporate social responsibility. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(4). doi: 10.12775/OeC.2016.036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2016.036
    View in Google Scholar
23. Kozubikova, L., Vojtovic, S., Rahman, A., & Smrcka, L. (2016). The role of entre-preneur’s gender, age and firm’s age in autonomy. The case study from the Czech Republic. Economic & Sociology, 9(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-2/12
    View in Google Scholar
24. Navickas, V., & Kontautiene, R. (2012). The influence of stakeholder-company relationship on competitiveness of company. Economics and Management, 17(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.17.3.2111
    View in Google Scholar
25. Navickas, V., & Kontautiene, R. (2013). The initiatives of corporate social respon-sibility as sources of innovations. Business: Theory and Practice, 14(1). doi: 10.3846/btp.2013.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2013.03
    View in Google Scholar
26. Navickas, V., & Kontautiene, R. (2013). The interaction between corporate social responsibility and competitiveness during the economic downturn. Economics and Management, 18(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.18.1.4005
    View in Google Scholar
27. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://www.sharedvalue.org/sites/default/files/resou rce-files/Strategy_and_Society.pdf, (11.08.2018).
    View in Google Scholar
28. Reinhardt, F. L., Stavins, R. N., & Vietor, R. H. K. (2008). Corporate social re-sponsibility through an economic lens. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2). doi: 10.1093/reep/ren008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/ren008
    View in Google Scholar
29. Smith, A. D. (2010). Growth of corporate social responsibility as a sustainable business strategy in difficult financial times. International Journal of Sustaina-ble Economy, 2(1). doi: 10.1504/IJSE.2010.029941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2010.029941
    View in Google Scholar
30. Strugatch, W. (2011). Turning values into valuation: can corporate social responsi-bility survive hard times and emerge intact? Journal of Management Develop-ment, 30(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711111098352
    View in Google Scholar
31. Szczuka, M. (2015). Social dimension of sustainability in CSR standards. Procedia Manufacturing, 3. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.587
    View in Google Scholar
32. Vojtovic, S. (2016). Managerial decision making process in the times of economic volatility. In 1st international conference contemporary issues in theory and practice of management location. Czestochawa.
    View in Google Scholar
33. Worthington, I., & Britton, C. (2006). The business environment. London: Prentice Hall.
    View in Google Scholar