Becoming business-like: the determinants of NGOs? marketization turning into social enterprises in Poland

Abstract

Research background: NGOs face an increasing expectation to be more business-like. They are becoming involved in selling services by performing a commercial activity, which, in turn, is a basic condition for creating social enterprises. The changes related to this approach are an essential condition for their survival and a significant reason for developing their new form as social enterprises. On the other hand, there is no lack of critical opinions related primarily to mission volatility. Currently, a discussion is taking place in the literature on factors that may affect NGOs? marketization; these, however, have not been empirically verified yet. The identified research gap constituted a major challenge for the author.

Purpose of the article: The purpose of this paper is to verify whether conducting a business activity influences the entrepreneurial way of NGOs? operation, and to indicate the factors that have a significant impact on their marketization.

Methods: On the basis of a representative national survey of 3,800 NGOs, including 412 social enterprises in Poland. a one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a stepwise backward regression analysis were carried out.

Findings & Value added: The analysis of the results confirms that there are significant differences between NGOs operating as social enterprises and NGOs not performing a business activity. In contrast with the existing literature, this study indicates that social enterprises have less diversified revenue sources and use a more or less democratic governance model. Moreover, Polish social enterprises less frequently adjust their policy direction to donors? interests. The factors significantly affecting NGOs? marketization include action strategies for several years, activity in favor of external benefit takers, close business cooperation, lack of permanent financing sources, and regular activity combined with flexible working time.

Keywords

marketization, NGOs, social enterprises, business-like approach

References

1. Amagoh, F. (2015). Improving the credibility and effectiveness of non-governmental organizations. Progress in Development Studies, 15(3). doi: 10.1177%2F1464993415578979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993415578979
   View in Google Scholar
2. Apostu, D. C. (2013). Non-governmental organization leadership and development. A review of the literature. Manager, 17.
   View in Google Scholar
3. Barr, A., Fafchamps, M., & Owens, T. (2005). The governance of non-governmental organizations in Uganda. World Development, 33(4). doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.09.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.09.010
   View in Google Scholar
4. Bruce, I., & Chew, C. (2011). Debate: the marketization of the voluntary sector. Public Money and Management, 31(3). doi: 10.1080/09540962.2011.573216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2011.573216
   View in Google Scholar
5. Çalışkan, K., & Callon, M. (2009). Economization, part 1: shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society, 38(3). doi: 10.1080/03085140903020580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903020580
   View in Google Scholar
6. Carmin, J. (2010). NGO capacity and environmental governance in Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Politica, 45(1-2). doi: 10.1057/ap.2009.21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2009.21
   View in Google Scholar
7. Carnochan, S., Samples, M., Myers, M., & Austin, M. J. (2014). Performance measurement challenges in nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43. doi: 10.1177/0899764013508009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013508009
   View in Google Scholar
8. Carroll, D. A., & Stater, K. J. (2009). Revenue diversification in nonprofit organizations: does it lead to financial stability? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4). doi: 10.1093/jopart/mun025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun025
   View in Google Scholar
9. Chan, Y., & Walmsley, R.P. (1997). Learning and understanding the Kruskal-Wallis One-way analysis-of-variance by-ranks test for differences among three or more independent groups. Phys Ther, 77. doi: 10.1093/ptj/77.12.1755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/77.12.1755
   View in Google Scholar
10. Coule, T. M. (2015). Nonprofit governance and accountability: Broadening the theoretical perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44. doi: 10.1177/0899764013503906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013503906
    View in Google Scholar
11. Dahan, N. M., Doh, J. P., Oetzel, J., & Yaziji, M. (2010). Corporate-NGO collaboration: co-creating new business models for developing markets. Long Range Planning, 43(2). doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.11.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.11.003
    View in Google Scholar
12. Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(4). doi: 10.1002/nml.43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.43
    View in Google Scholar
13. Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7
    View in Google Scholar
14. Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). Refusing the market: a democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38. doi: 10.1177/0899764009333686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009333686
    View in Google Scholar
15. Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluever, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x
    View in Google Scholar
16. Evans, B., Richmond, T., & Shields, J. (2005). Structuring neoliberal governance: the nonprofit sector, emerging new modes of control and the marketisation of service delivery. Policy and Society, 24(1). doi: 10.1016/S1449-4035(05)70050-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1449-4035(05)70050-3
    View in Google Scholar
17. Fowler, A. (1997). Striking a balance: a guide to enhancing the effectiveness of NGOs in international development. London: Earthscan.
    View in Google Scholar
18. Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3). doi: 10.1177/0899764099283002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764099283002
    View in Google Scholar
19. Frumkin, P., & Keating, E. K. (2011). Diversification reconsidered: the risks and rewards of revenue concentration. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2(2). doi: 10.1080/19420676.2011.614630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2011.614630
    View in Google Scholar
20. Gamage, J., Weerahandi, S. (1998). Size performance of some tests in one-way anova. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 27(3), doi: 10.1080/03610919808813500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610919808813500
    View in Google Scholar
21. Geobey, S., & Weber, O., (2013). Lessons in operationalizing social finance: the case of Vancouver City Savings Credit Union. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 3(2). doi: 10.1080/20430795.2013.776259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2013.776259
    View in Google Scholar
22. Guo, B. (2006). Charity for profit? Exploring factors associated with the commercialization of human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1). doi: 10.1177/0899764001302010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764005282482
    View in Google Scholar
23. Hager, M. (2001). Financial vulnerability among arts organizations: a test of the Tuckman-Chang measures. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(2). doi: 10.1177/0899764005282482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764001302010
    View in Google Scholar
24. Hahn, T., & Pinkse, J. (2014). Private environmental governance through cross-sector partnerships: tensions between competition and effectiveness. Organization & Environment, 27(2). doi: 10.1177/1086026614530996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614530996
    View in Google Scholar
25. Hall, K., Alcock, P., & Millar, R. (2012). Start up and sustainability: marketisation and the social enterprise investment fund in England. Journal of Social Policy, 41(4). doi: 10.1017/S0047279412000347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279412000347
    View in Google Scholar
26. Han, J. (2017). Social marketisation and policy influence of third sector organisations: evidence from the UK. Voluntas, International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(3). doi: 10.1007/s11266-017-9853-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9853-1
    View in Google Scholar
27. Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: the influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2). doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268
    View in Google Scholar
28. King, D. (2017). Becoming business-like: governing the nonprofit professional. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(2). doi: 10.1177/08997640 16663321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764016663321
    View in Google Scholar
29. Larose, D. T. (2008). Methods and models of data mining. Warszawa: PWN. doi: 10.1002/0471756482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471756482
    View in Google Scholar
30. LeRoux, K. M. (2005). What drives nonprofit entrepreneurship? A look at budget trends of metro Detroit social service agencies. American Review of Public Administration, 35. doi: 10.1177%2F0275074005278813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005278813
    View in Google Scholar
31. Leung, S., Mo, P., Ling, H., Chandra, Y., & Sum Ho, S. (2019). Enhancing the competitiveness and sustainability of social enterprises in Hong Kong: a three-dimensional analysis. China Journal of Accounting Research 12(2). doi: 10.1016/j.cjar.2019.03.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2019.03.002
    View in Google Scholar
32. Lindenberg, M. (2001). Are we at the cutting edge or the blunt edge? Improving NGO organizational performance with private and public sector strategic management frameworks. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(3). doi: 10.1002/nml.11302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.11302
    View in Google Scholar
33. Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2016). Nonprofit organizations becoming business-like a systematic review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1). doi: 10.1177%2F0899764014561796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014561796
    View in Google Scholar
34. Malska, W. (2016). The use of Levene's test and Brown-Forsythe test in studies of homogeneity of variance, Edukacja – Technika – Informatyka, 4(18). doi: 10.15584/eti.2016.4.48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15584/eti.2016.4.48
    View in Google Scholar
35. Marcinkevičiūtė, L., & Žukovskis, J. (2016). Factors shaping management style of a manager: a case study of kaunas district non-governmental organisations. Economics, 2.
    View in Google Scholar
36. Marciszewska, A. (2014). Profesionalization of non-profit organizations management. Organizations andManagement, 4.
    View in Google Scholar
37. Martens, K. (2002). Mission impossible? Defining nongovernmental organizations. Voluntas, International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13(3). doi:10.1023/A: 1020341526691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020341526691
    View in Google Scholar
38. McCrum-Gardner, E. (2008). Which is the correct statistical test to use? British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 46. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2007. 09.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.09.002
    View in Google Scholar
39. Mikołajczak, P. (2017a). Sources and instruments of financial support for social enterprises. Poznań: UEP.
    View in Google Scholar
40. Mikołajczak, P. (2017b). Importance of funding sources to the scale of activity of social enterprises. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 4(88). doi: 10.18276/frfu.2017.88/2-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18276/frfu.2017.88/2-14
    View in Google Scholar
41. Mikołajczak, P. (2018a). Sources of funding and revenues of social enterprises in Poland in comparison to selected European countries and world-wide, Safe Bank, 2(71). doi: 10.26.354/bb.6.2.71.2018.
    View in Google Scholar
42. Mikołajczak, P. (2018b). The impact of the diversification of revenues on NGOs’ commercialization: evidence from Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(4). doi: 10.24136/eq.2018.037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.037
    View in Google Scholar
43. Mircioiu, C., & Atkinson, J. A. (2017). Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods applied to a Likert scale. Pharmacy, 5(26). doi: 10.3390/ pharmacy5020026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy5020026
    View in Google Scholar
44. Reilly, T. (2016). Are social enterprises viable models for funding nonprofits? Human service organizations management. Leadership and Governance, 4(4). doi: 10.1080/23303131.2016.1165047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1165047
    View in Google Scholar
45. Rondinelli, D. A., & London, T. (2003). How corporations and environmental groups cooperate: assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations. Academy of Management Executive, 17(1). doi: 10.5465/ame.2003.9474812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2003.9474812
    View in Google Scholar
46. Salamon, L. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: the theory of government nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action & Research, 16. doi: 10.1177/08997 6408701600104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089976408701600104
    View in Google Scholar
47. Simpson, M., & Cheney, G. (2007). Marketization, participation, and communication within New Zealand retirement villages: a critical-rhetorical and discursive analysis. Discourse & Communication, 1(2). doi: 10.1177/1750481307076006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307076006
    View in Google Scholar
48. Stankiewicz, J., & Seiler, B. (2013). The professionalization of nongovernmental organizations as a factor of their success. Zarządzanie i Finanse, 4(2).
    View in Google Scholar
49. Sanders, M. L. (2015). Being nonprofit-like in a market economy: understanding the mission- market tension in nonprofit organizing. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44. doi: 10.1177/0899764013508606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013508606
    View in Google Scholar
50. Sanders, M. L., & McClellan, J. G. (2014). Being business-like while pursuing a social mission: acknowledging the inherent tensions in US nonprofit organizing. Organization, 21(1). doi: 10.1177/1350508412464894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412464894
    View in Google Scholar
51. Vacekova, G., Valentinov, V., & Nemec, J. (2017). Rethinking non-profit commercialization: the case of the Czech Republic. Voluntas, International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(5). doi:10.1007/s11266-016-9772-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9772-6
    View in Google Scholar
52. Wry, T., & York, J. G. (2017). An identity-based approach to social enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 42(3). doi: 10.5465/amr.2013.0506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0506
    View in Google Scholar
53. Yazıcı, K., Uslu, S., & Arık, S. (2016). The investigation of the social entrepreneurship characteristics of social studies pre-service teachers. Cogent Education, 3(1). doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1141455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1141455
    View in Google Scholar
54. Yaziji, M., & Doh, J. (2009). NGOs and corporations: conflict and collaboration. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511626708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626708
    View in Google Scholar
55. Young, D., & Salamon, L. M. (2002). Commercialization, social ventures, and for-profit competition. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.). The state of nonprofit America, Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
    View in Google Scholar
56. Zielińska, A. (2011). Management strategies for non-governmental organizations. Master of Business Administration, 4.
    View in Google Scholar