Vol. 10 No. 4 (2019)

Articles

Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs? executives in the comparative perspective for Czechia and Turkey

Published 29-12-2019

Aleksandr Ključnikov
University of Entrepreneurship and Law

Mehmet Civelek
University of Entrepreneurship and Law

Petr Čech
University of Entrepreneurship and Law

Jitka Kloudová
University of Entrepreneurship and Law

Abstract

Research background: The executives of SMEs that have higher innovativeness, risk taking, proactiveness, competitive aggressiveness and autonomy dynamize the strategic posture of SMEs, thus, those firms can reach better financial and economic conditions. However, existence of many differences among countries, such as cultural values and market conditions, can cause variations in EO of these executives. Therefore, this fact can be one of the reasons why the performance and financial power of SMEs differ in various countries. 

Purpose of the article: This study aspires to find out the differences in entrepreneurial orientation (EO) of younger and older, female and male, and more and less educated executives of SMEs from various countries.

Methods: 1141 Czech and 479 Turkish executives were analyzed separately by the Mann-Whitney U test, to find out the differences in EO. The researcher ran the analyzes by SPSS Statistical Software.

Findings & Value added: The results indicate that risk-taking and competitive aggressiveness of the executives differ regarding their gender, while innovativeness, proactiveness and autonomy do not. While there are significant differences between proactiveness, autonomy and innovativeness of older and younger executives, no differences exist in risk-taking and competitive aggressiveness. Regarding educational status, more educated executives perform better in innovativeness, proactiveness and autonomy, while less educated executives have higher propensities in risk taking and competitive aggressiveness. Masculinity, fear of failure, perception of obstacles, motivation of SMEs? executives and location of businesses might be the reasons of these results. By including the survey respondents from different countries and all dimensions of EO into the analyses, this study finds similarities and differences in gender, age and education levels and of SMEs? executives and their EO. This research also suggests some policies for governments and institutions to close the gap between EO of the executives. These facts not only make this research to unique, but also constitute a valuable addition to the literature.

Keywords

entrepreneurial orientation, Czech SMEs, Turkish SMEs, age, gender and educational status of SMEs’ executives

PDF

References

  1. Altinay, L., & Wang, C. (2011). The influence of an entrepreneur’s socio-cultural characteristics on the entrepreneurial orientation of small firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(4). doi: 10.1108/146260011 11179749.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001111179749
  2. Ayub, A., Razzaq, A., Aslam, M. S., & Iftekhar, H. (2013). Gender effects on entrepreneurial orientation and value innovation: evidence from Pakistan. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(1).
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Berrone, P., Gertel, H., Giuliodori, R., Bernard, L., & Meiners, E. (2014). Determinants of performance in microenterprises: preliminary evidence from Argentina. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(3). doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12045.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12045
  4. Bonte, W., Falck, O., & Heblich, H., (2007). Demography and innovative entrepreneurship. Jena Economic Research Papers, 84. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5142617_Demography_and_Innovative_Entrepreneurship (18.05.2019).
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Boyer, T., & Blazy, R. (2014). Born to be alive? The survival of innovative and non-innovative french micro-start-ups. Small Business Economics, 42(4). doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9522-8.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9522-8
  6. Brescoll, V. L., Uhlmann, E. L., & Moss-Racusin, C. (2012). Masculinity, status, and subordination: why working for a gender stereotype violator causes men to lose status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1). doi: 10.1016/j. jesp.2011.06.005.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.005
  7. Brunow, S., & Hirte, G. (2006). Age structure and regional economic growth. Review of Regional Research, 26. doi: 10.1007/s10037-005-0075-4.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-005-0075-4
  8. Carter, S., Shaw, E., Lam, W., & Wilson, F. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurship, and bank lending: the criteria and processes used by bank loan officers in assessing applications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1540 -6520.2007.00181.x.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00181.x
  9. Celebioglu, F., & Dall’erba, S. (2010). Spatial disparities across the regions of turkey: an exploratory spatial data analysis. Annals of Regional Science, 45(2). doi: 10.1007/s00168-009-0313-8.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0313-8
  10. Cochran, W. G. (1963). Sampling techniques. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Czech Statistical Office, (2017). GDP in current prices. Retrieved from http://apl.czso.cz/pll/rocenka/rocenka.presmsocas (27.05.2019).
    View in Google Scholar
  12. De Martino, R., & Barbato, R. (2003). Differences between women and men mba entrepreneurs: exploring family flexibility and wealth creation as career motivators. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6). doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03) 00003-X.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00003-X
  13. De Winne, S., & Sels, L. (2010). Interrelationships between human capital, hrm and innovation in Belgian start-ups aiming at an innovation strategy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21. doi: 10.1080/09585192. 2010.505088.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2010.505088
  14. Diaz-Garcia, M. C., & Jimenez-Moreno, J. (2010). Entrepreneurial intention: the role of gender. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 6. doi: 10.1007/s11365-008-0103-2.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0103-2
  15. Esnard-Flavius, T. (2010). Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial attitude orientations: the case of the Caribbean. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(13). doi: 10.19030/iber.v9i13.650.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v9i13.650
  16. European Commission (2017). SBA fact sheet Czech Republic. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/32581/attachments/7/translations/en/renditions/native (08.05.2019).
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Filser, M., & Eggers, F. (2014). EO and firm performance: a comparative study of Austria, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. South African Journal of Business Management ,45(1).
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v45i1.117
  18. Frank, H., Lueger, M., & Korunka, C. (2007). The significance of personality in business startup intentions, start-up realization and business success. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19(3). doi: 10.1080/08985620701218387.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620701218387
  19. Gergely, F. (2016). The effects of strategic orientations and perceived environment on firm performance. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(1). doi: 10.7441/joc.2016 .01.04.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.01.04
  20. Goktan, A. B., & Gupta, V. K., (2015). Sex, gender, and individual entrepreneurial orientation: evidence from four countries. International Entrepreneurship and management Journal, 11. doi: 10.1007/s11365-013-0278-z.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0278-z
  21. Gunerergin, M., Penbek, S. & Zaptcioglu, D. (2012). Exploring the problems and advantages of Turkish SMEs for sustainability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.998.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.998
  22. Islam, A. M., Khan, M. K., Obaidullah, A. Z. M., & Alam, M. S. (2011). Effect of entrepreneur and firm characteristics on the business success of smes in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(3). doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v6n3p289.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n3p289
  23. Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S., & Heiko, K. K. (2005). EO, dynamic capabilities and international performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3. doi: 10.1007/s10843-005-1133-2.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-005-1133-2
  24. Jelenc L., Pisapia, J. & Ivanusic, N. (2016). Demographic variables influencing individual entrepreneurial orientation and strategic thinking capability. Journal of Economic and Social Development, 3(1).
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Kato, M., Okamuro, H., & Honjo, Y. (2015). Does founder human capital matter for innovation? Evidence from Japanese start-ups. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1). doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12094.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12094
  26. Khanagha, A., Dehkordi, A. M., Zali, M., R., S., & Hejazi, R. (2017). Performance implications of entrepreneurial orientation at public research and technology institutions Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(4). doi: 10.9770/jesi. 2017.4.4(15).
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.4(15)
  27. Kowo, S. A., Adenuga, O. A. O., & Sabitu, O. O. (2019). The role of SMEs development on poverty alleviation in Nigeria. Insights into Regional Development, 1(3). doi: 10.9770/ird.2019.1.3(3).
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2019.1.3(3)
  28. Kraus, S., Rigtering, J. P. C., Hughes, M., & Hosman, V. (2012). EO and the business performance of SMEs: a quantitative study from the Netherlands. Review of Managerial Science, 6. doi: 10.1007/s11846-011-0062-9.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-011-0062-9
  29. KOSGEB, SME Strategy and action plan (2015). 2015-2018 KSEP Report. Retrieved from https://www.kosgeb.gov.tr/Content/Upload/Dosya/Mali %20Tablolar/KSEP/Kobi_Stratejisi_ve_Eylem_Plani_(2015-2018).pdf (09.05.2019).
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Kozubíková, L., Homolka, L., & Kristalas, D. (2017). The effect of business environment and entrepreneurs’ gender on perception of financial risk in the SMEs sector. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(1). doi: 10.7441/joc.2017.01.03.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2017.01.03
  31. Kreiser, P. M., Marino, L. D., Dickson, P., & Weaver, K. M. (2010). Cultural influences on eo: the impact of national culture on risk taking and proactiveness in SMEs. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 34(5). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00396.x.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00396.x
  32. Laforet, S. (2013). Organizational innovative outcomes in SMEs: effects of size, age and sector. Journal of World Business, 48. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2012.09.005.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.09.005
  33. Lafuente, E. M. & Vaillant, Y. (2013). Age driven influence of role-models on entrepreneurship in a transition economy. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(1). doi: 10.1108/14626001311298475.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001311298475
  34. Laukkanen, T., Nagy, G., Hirvonen, S., Reijonen, H. & Pasanen, M. (2013). The effect of strategic orientations on business performance in SMEs a multigroup analysis comparing Hungary and Finland. International Marketing Review, 30(6). doi: 10.1108/IMR-09-2011-0230.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2011-0230
  35. Lechner, C., & Gudmundsson, S. V. (2014). EO, firm strategy and small firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 32(1). doi: 10.1177/026624 2612455034.
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Levesque, M., & Minniti, M. (2006). The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Business Venturing, 21. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005 .04.003.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.003
  37. Levesque, M., & Minniti, M. (2011). Age matters: how demographics influence aggregate entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5. doi: 10.10 02/sej.117.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.117
  38. Lim, S., & Envick, E. R., (2012). Gender and entrepreneurial orientation: a multi country study. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9. doi: 10.1007/s11365-011-0183-2.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0183-2
  39. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1). doi: 10.2307/258632.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258632
  40. Mamman, A. (2014). Effect of entrepreneurship education on capacity building in Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs) in Nigeria. International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship, 1(11).
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Mengistae, T. (2006). Competition and entrepreneurs' human capital in small business longevity and growth. Journal of Development Studies, 42(5). doi: 10.1080/00220380600742050.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380600742050
  42. Minniti, M., & Nardone, C., (2007). Being in someone else’s shoes: the role of gender in nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28. doi: 10.1007/s11187-006-9017-y.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9017-y
  43. Mueller, S. L., & Conway Data-on, M. (2008). Gender-role orientation as a determinant of entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 13(1). doi: 10.1142/S108494670800082X.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S108494670800082X
  44. Munoz, J. M., Welsh, D. H. B., Chan, S., & Raven, P. V. (2015). Microenterprises in Malaysia: a preliminary study of the factors for management success. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11. doi: 10.1007/s11365-014-0302-y.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0302-y
  45. Naude, W., Gries, T., Wood, E., & Meintjiess, A., (2008). Regional determinants of entrepreneurial startups in a developing country. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20. doi: 10.1080/08985620701631498.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620701631498
  46. OECD (2019). Financing SMEs and entrepreneurs: an OECD scoreboard. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/industry-and-services/financing-smes-and-entrepreneurs-2019_fin_sme_ent-2019-en (14.05.2019).
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/fin_sme_ent-2019-en
  47. Oosterbeek, H., Van Praag, M., & Ijsselstein, A. (2010). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European Economic Review, 54. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.002.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.002
  48. Petrakis, P. (2005). Risk perception, risk propensity and entrepreneurial behavior: the Greek case. Journal of American Academy of Business, 7(1). doi: 10.1016/j. ijproman.2016.07.004
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Pett, T. M., & Wolff, J. A. (2012). SME identity and homogeneity – are there meaningful differences between micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises? Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 6(2).
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x
  51. Santos, F. J., Romero, I., & Fernández‐Serrano, J. (2012) SMEs and entrepreneurial quality from a macroeconomic perspective. Management Decision, 50(8). doi: 10.1108/00251741211261980.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211261980
  52. Saunders, M. N. K., Philip Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2015). Research methods for business students. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Schouten, M. J. (2019). Undoing gender inequalities: insights from the Portuguese perspective. Insights into Regional Development, 2. doi: 10.9770/ird.2019 .1.2(1).
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2019.1.2(1)
  54. Shinnar, R. S., Giacomin, O., & Janssen, F., (2012). Entrepreneurial perceptions and intentions: the role of gender and culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00509.x.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00509.x
  55. Soininen, J., Puumalainen, K., Sjögrén, H., & Syrjä, P. (2012). The impact of global economic crisis on SMEs. Management Research Review, 35(10). doi: 10.1108/01409171211272660.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211272660
  56. Verner, T. (2011). National competitiveness and expenditure on education, research and development. Journal of Competitiveness, 2.
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Van der Sluis, Van Praag, M., & Vijverberg, W. (2005). Entrepreneurship selection and performance: a meta-analysis of the impact of education in developing countries. World Bank Economic Review, 13(2). doi: 10.1093/wber/lhi013.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhi013
  58. Welsh, D. H. B., Munoz, J. M., Deng, S., & Raven, P. V. (2013). Microenterprise performance and microenterprise zones (MEZOs) in China. Management Decision, 51(1). doi:10.1108/00251741311291292.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311291292
  59. Zehir, C., Gurol, Y. , Karaboga, T., & Kole, Y. (2016). Strategic human resource management and firm performance: the mediating role of EO. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.045.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.045
  60. Zhang, Y., Duysters, G., & Cloodt, M. (2013). The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students´ entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(3). doi: 10.1007/s11365-012-0246-z.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0246-z
  61. Zortea-Johnston, E., Darroch, J., & Matear, S. (2012). Business orientations and innovation in small and medium sized enterprises. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8. doi: 10.1007/s11365-011-0170-7.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0170-7
  62. Wichitsathian, S., Nakruang, D. (2019). Knowledge integration capability and entrepreneurial orientation: case of Pakthongchai Silk Groups Residing. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(2). doi: 10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(13).
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(13)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 173

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)