Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Water scarcity: regional analyses in the Czech Republic from 2014 to 2018

Abstract

Research background: Water is a scarce natural resource essential for life and also many economic activities. Scarcity of drinking water is a problem that is ad-dressed at national and international levels. Global water demand continues to rise, but the quantity and quality of water resources is declining in many regions. Recent surveys of the population of the Czech Republic show that the most serious global problems are waste accumulation, water pollution, lack of drinking water and air pollution. Average temperatures continue to rise across Europe due to climate change and water is expected to become increasingly scarce in many areas. An adequate supply of good-quality water is a pre-requisite for economic and social development, and thus it is necessary to learn to save water and better manage our available resources in this area.

Purpose of the article: The purpose of this study was to investigate to what degree environmental problems ? especially the issue of drinking water scarcity ? have been evaluated in the Czech Republic from 2014 to 2018 and whether the fear of a lack of drinking water has motivated water conservation.

Methods: A regional analysis of water availability in the Czech Republic and the possible causes of water scarcity has been carried out. Subsequently, selected socio-economic factors that could have an impact on the assessment of drinking water scarcity are analyzed using Gamma and Kendall's Tau and logistic regression. The analyzed time period is from 2014 to 2018. Microdata was taken from the Centre for Research of Public Opinion, and selected regional-level statistics from the Czech Statistical Office have been added to this data to supplement it.

Findings & Value added: The perception of drinking water shortages is not only influenced by indicators representing the volume and price of water in each region, but can also be determined by other socio-economic factors such as income, gender, age and education.

Keywords

water scarcity, regional analyses, Czech Republic, sustainability

PDF

References

  1. Bressers, H., Bressers, N., & Larrue, C. (2016). Governance for drought resilience. The Governance Assessment Tool and Its Use. Springer: Berlin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29671-5
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Buyukkamaci, N., & Alkan, H. S. (2013). Public acceptance potential for reuse applications in Turkey. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 80. doi:10. 1016/j.resconrec.2013.08.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.08.001
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Cogeca, C. (2003). Assessment of the impact of the heat wave and drought of the summer 2003 on agriculture and forest. Committee of Agricultural Organisations in the European Union and General Committee for Agricultural Cooperation in the European Union, Brussels, Belgium.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Cole, M. J. Bailey, R. M., Cullis, J. D. S, & New, M. G. (2018). Water for sustainable development in the Berg Water Management Area. South Africa Journal of Science, 114 (3/4). doi: 10.17159/sajs.2018/20170134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2018/20170134
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Czech Statistical Office (2014–2018). Water supply systems, sewerage and watercourses 2014–2018. Retrieved from: https://www.czso.cz/ (20.08.2019).
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Davijani, M. H., Banihabib, M. E., Anvar, A. N., & Hashemi, S. R. (2016). Multi-objective optimization model for the allocation of water resources in arid regions based on the maximization of socioeconomic efficiency. Water Resources Management, 30(3). doi:10.1007/s11269-015-1200-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1200-y
    View in Google Scholar
  7. European Commission (2012). A blueprint to safeguard Europe’s water resources. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2010). Water scarcity & droughts in the European Union. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/pubs/pdf/factsheets/water_ scarcity.pdf (15.08.2019).
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Fang, C., Bao, C., & Huang, J. (2007). Management implications to water resources constraint force on socio-economic system in rapid urbanization: a case study of the Hexi Corridor, NW China. Water Resources Management, 21(9). doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-9117-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9117-0
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Fučík, P., Hejduk, T., & Peterková, J. (2015). Quantifying water pollution sources in a small tile-drained agricultural watershed. CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water, 43(5). doi: 10.1002/clen.201300929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201300929
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Fučík, P., Zajíček, A., Kaplická, M., Duffková, R., Peterková, J., Maxová, J., & Takáčová, Š. (2017). Incorporating rainfall-runoff events into nitrate-nitrogen and phosphorus load assessments for small tile-drained catchments. Water, 9. doi: 10.3390/w9090712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w9090712
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Garcia, X., & Pargament, D. (2015). Reusing wastewater to cope with water scarcity: Economic, social and environmental considerations for decision–making. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 101. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec. 2015.05.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.015
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Garcia-Cuerva, L., Berglund, E. Z., & Binder, A. R. (2016). Public perceptions of water shortages, conservation behaviors, and support for water reuse in the US. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 113. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec. 2016.06.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.006
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Gómez-Llanos, E., Durán–Barroso, P., & Robina–Ramírez, R. (2020). Analysis of consumer awareness of sustainable water consumption by the water footprint concept. Science of The Total Environment, 721:137743. doi:10.1016/j.sci totenv.2020.137743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137743
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Government of the Czech Republic (2017). Strategic framework 2030. Retrieved from: https://www.cr2030.cz/strategie/ (15.08.2019)
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Gu, Q., Chen, Y., Pody, R., Cheng, R., Zheng, X., & Zhang, Z. (2015). Public perception and acceptability toward reclaimed water in Tianjin. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.013
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Hallowes, J. S., Pott, A. J., & Dockel, M. (2008). Managing water scarcity to encourage sustainable economic growth and social development in South Africa. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(3). doi:10.1080/07900620802163650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620802163650
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Hervás-Gámez, C, & Delgado-Ramos, F. (2019). Drought management planning policy: from Europe to Spain. Sustainability, 11(7). doi: 10.3390/su11071862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071862
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Hummel, D., & Lux, A. (2007). Population decline and infrastructure: the case of the German water supply system. In Vienna yearbook of population research. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2007s167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2007s167
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences. The Public Opinion Research Centre (CVMM) (2019). Our society 2014–2018. Czech Social Science Data Archive. Retrieved from: http://archiv.soc.cas.cz (20.08.2019)
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Kemp, B., Randle, M., Hurlimann, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2012). Community acceptance of recycled water: can we inoculate the public against scare campaigns? Journal of Public Affairs, 12(4). doi:10.1002/pa.1429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1429
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Kummu, M., Ward, P. J., de Moel, H., & Varis, O. (2010). Is physical water scarcity a new phenomenon? Global assessment of water shortage over the last two millennia. Environmental Research Letters, 5(3). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ 5/3/034006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034006
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Leach, W. D., & Pelkey, N. W. (2001). Making watershed partnerships work: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(6). doi: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2001)127:6(378). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:6(378)
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Liu, J, Yang, H., Gosling, S. N., Kummu, M., Flörke, M., Pfister, S., & Oki, T. (2017). Water scarcity assessments in the past, present and future. Earth's future, 5(6). doi: 10.1002/2016ef000518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000518
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Liu, J., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., & Luck, G. W. (2003). Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature, 421(6922). doi:10.1038/nature01359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01359
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Lubell, M., & Edelenbos, J. (2013). Integrated water resources management: a comparative laboratory for water governance. International Journal of Water Governance, 1(3). doi: 10.7564/13-ijwg14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7564/13-IJWG14
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Marek, D., Baun, M., & Dabrowski, M. (2017). The challenge of implementing European Union environmental law in the new member states: the urban waste water treatment directive in the Czech Republic and Poland. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(6). doi:10.1177/0263774X16686071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16686071
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Marks, J. S. (2003). The sociology of disgust towards the use of reclaimed water. In Water recycling Australia 2nd national conference. Brisbane, Queensland: Australian Water Association, National Water Recycling Forum.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Martínková, M., Hejduk, T., Fučík, P., Vymazal, J., & Hanel, M. (2018). Assessment of runoff nitrogen load reduction measures for agricultural catchments. Central European Journal of Geosciences, 10(1). doi: 10.1515/ geo-2018-0032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0032
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Matos, C., Teixeira, C. A., Bento, R., Varajão, J., & Bentes, I. (2014). An exploratory study on the influence of socio-demographic characteristics on water end uses inside buildings. Science of The Total Environment, 466-467. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.036
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2016). Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Science Advances, 2(2). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500323
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic (2017). Adaptace na změnu klimatu. Retrieved from: https://www.mzp.cz/cz/adaptace_na_zmenu_klimatu (01.09.2019).
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Nauges, C., & Thomas, A. (2000). Privately operated water utilities, municipal price negotiation, and estimation of residential water demand: the case of France. Land Economics, 76(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3147258
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Rogers, P. P., Llamas, M. R., & Martínez-Cortina, L. (Eds.). (2006). Water crisis: myth or reality? London: Fundación Marcelino Botín, Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439834275
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Smith, H. M., Brouwer, S., Jeffrey, P., & Frijns, J. (2018). Public responses to water reuse – Understanding the evidence. Journal of Environmental Management, 207. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.021
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Tundisi, J. G. (2008). Water resources in the future: problems and solutions. Estudos Avançados, 22(63). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142008000200002
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Tundisi, J. G., & Barbosa, F. A. R. (2018). Conservação e uso sustentável de recursos hídricos. Ângulos da água: desafios da integração. Belo Horizonte: Editora, UFMG.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. World Health Organization (2017). Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: 2017 update and SDG baselines.
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Zajíček, A., Fučík, P., Kaplická, M., Liška, M., Maxová, J., & Dobiáš, J. (2018). Pesticide leaching by agricultural drainage in sloping, mid-textured soil conditions – the role of runoff components. Water Science and Technology, 77(7). doi: 10.2166/wst.2018.068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.068
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Zajíček, A., Pomije, T., & Kvítek, T. (2016). Event water detection in tile drainage runoff using stable isotopes and a water temperature in small agricultural catchment in Bohemian-Moravian Highlands, Czech Republic. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(10). doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-5561-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5561-1
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Zhuo, L., Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2016). The effect of inter–annual variability of consumption, production, trade and climate on crop–related green and blue water footprints and inter–regional virtual water trade: a study for China (1978–2008). Water Research, 94. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.037
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 153

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.