Unboxing the black box on the dimensions of social globalisation and the efficiency of microfinance institutions in Asia

Abstract

Research background: Microfinance institutions (MFIs) play an important role in alleviating poverty. Thus, MFIs should be efficient in order to ensure that their objectives on social welfare and financial performance can be achieved by identifying the potential determinants, specifically on social globalisation.

Purpose of the article: This paper examines the impacts of the social globalisation dimensions of interpersonal, informational, and cultural globalisations on the financial and social efficiency of MFIs.

Methods: The data period covered the years 2011?2018; the data set consists of 176 MFIs from six Asian countries. The Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach was employed to examine the MFIs? efficiency levels. Generalised Least Square (GLS) regressions were used to analyse the impacts of social globalisation and other determinants towards the efficiency of MFIs.

Findings and value added: Interpersonal globalisation had a significantly negative correlation with social efficiency, suggesting that increasing the number of foreigners in management intrudes on local managers? decisions. Informational globalisation had a significantly positive correlation with financial and social efficiency, which signifies that more information produces monopolistic profits in this industry. Finally, cultural globalisation had a positive correlation with social efficiency, demonstrating that a global trading culture improves the abilities and technological skills for labour development and enhances MFIs? social efficiency. In general, the Cobb Douglas Production theory explained the understanding of the impacts social globalisation has on MFI efficiency. Furthermore, the findings from this study could provide important scientific, practical gap and contribute new insights and implications to various parties. Firstly, governments or policymakers can establish effective national policies and strategies. Secondly, this study could support investors in monitoring and understanding the performance of MFIs. Finally, the research could fill scholarly gaps and uncover more potential factors that influence the efficiency of MFIs.

Keywords

microfinance institutions, social globalisation, social efficiency, financial efficiency

References

1. Abayie, E., Amanor, K., & Frimpong, J. (2011). The measurement and determinants of economic efficiency of microfinance institutions in Ghana: a stochastic frontier approach. African Review of Economics and Finance, 2(2),149? 166. doi: 10.4314/gjds.v13i2.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/gjds.v13i2.7
   View in Google Scholar
2. Abrar, A., & Javaid, A. Y. (2016). The impact of capital structure on the profitability of microfinance institutions. South Asian Journal of Management Sciences, 10(1), 21?37. doi: 10.21621/sajms.2016101.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21621/SAJMS.2016101.03
   View in Google Scholar
3. Al-Mamoorey, M. A., & Al-Rubaye, M. M. M. (2020). The role of electronic payment systems in Iraq in reducing banking risks: an empirical research on private banks. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 49?59. doi: 10.1751 2/pjms.2020.21.2.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.04
   View in Google Scholar
4. Alaeddin, O., Altounjy, R., Zainudin, Z., & Kamarudin, F. (2018). From physical to digital: investigating consumer behaviour of switching to mobile wallet. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17(2), 18?30. doi: 10.17512/pjms.20 18.17.2.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2018.17.2.02
   View in Google Scholar
5. Assefa, E., Hermes, N., & Meesters, A. (2013). Competition and the performance of microfinance institutions. Applied Financial Economics, 23(9), 767?782. doi: 10.1080/09603107.2012.754541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2012.754541
   View in Google Scholar
6. Autio, E. (2005). Creative tension: the significance of Ben Oviatt?s and Patricia McDougall?s article ?Toward a theory of international new ventures?. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1), 9?19. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-74228-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400117
   View in Google Scholar
7. Badenhorst, J. A., Maurer, C., & Brevis Landsberg, T. (2013). Developing measures for the evaluation of information flow efficiency in supply chains. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 7(1), 1?13. doi: 10.410 2/jtscm.v7i1.88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v7i1.88
   View in Google Scholar
8. Banker, R. D., & Natarajan, R. (2008). Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis. Operations Research, 56(1), 48?58. doi: 10.1287/opre.1070.0460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1070.0460
   View in Google Scholar
9. Banker, R. D., Chang, H., & Lee, S. Y. (2010). Differential impact of Korean banking system reforms on bank productivity. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(7), 1450?1460. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.02.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.02.023
   View in Google Scholar
10. Bassem, B. S. (2008). Efficiency of microfinance institutions in the Mediterranean: an application of DEA. Transition Studies Review, 15(2), 343?354. doi: 10.10 07/s11300-008-0012-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11300-008-0012-7
    View in Google Scholar
11. Berger, A. N., DeYoung, R., Genay, H., & Udell, G.F. (2000). Globalization of financial institutions: evidence from cross border banking performance. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 1, 23?120. doi: 10.1353 /pfs.2000.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pfs.2000.0001
    View in Google Scholar
12. Bibi, U., Balli, H. O., Matthews, C. D., & Tripe, D. W. (2018). New approaches to measure the social performance of microfinance institutions (MFIs). International Review of Economics & Finance, 53, 88?97. doi: 10.1016/j.iref .2017.10.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.10.010
    View in Google Scholar
13. Delawi, A. S., & Ramo, W. M. (2020). The impact of accounting information system on performance management. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 36?48. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.03
    View in Google Scholar
14. Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091?1110. doi: 10.1080/000368 40500392078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500392078
    View in Google Scholar
15. Efendic, V., & Hadziahmetovic, N. (2017). The social and financial efficiency of microfinance institutions: the case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 12(2), 85?101. doi: 10.1515/je b-2017-0018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jeb-2017-0018
    View in Google Scholar
16. Fayed., M. E., & Ezzat, A. M. (2020). Central bank independence and democracy: does transparency matter? Contemporary Economics, 14(2), 90?111. doi: 10.5709/ce.1897-9254.334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.334
    View in Google Scholar
17. Gaganis, C. (2016). Assessing the overall performance of microfinance institutions. International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, 7(1), 52?83. doi: 10.1504/ijbaaf.2016.079165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBAAF.2016.079165
    View in Google Scholar
18. Gomez-Piqueras, P. Ruiz-Barquín, R., & Olmedilla, A. (2020). Translation and adaptation to English of a questionnaire to determine the psychological readiness of the injured football player. Journal of Sport Psychology, 29(1), 39?48.
    View in Google Scholar
19. Gumus, H., Saracli, S, Yagmur, R, Isik, O., & Ersoz, Y. (2020). The investigation of sportsmanship behaviors of university students. Journal of Sport Psychology, 29(1), 13?20.
    View in Google Scholar
20. Hussain, H. I., Kamarudin, F., Thaker, H. M. T., & Salem, M. A. (2019). Artificial neural network to model managerial timing decision: non-linear evidence of deviation from target leverage. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 12(2), 1282?1294. doi: 10.2991/ijcis.d.191101.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.191101.002
    View in Google Scholar
21. Hussain, H. I., Kot, S., Kamarudin, F., & Mun, W. C. (2020a). The nexus of competition freedom and the efficiency of microfinance institutions. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(2), 67?89. doi: 10.7441/joc.2020.02.05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.02.05
    View in Google Scholar
22. Hussain, H. I., Slusarczyk, B., Kamarudin, F., Thaker, H. M. T., & Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K. (2020b). An investigation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system to predict the relationship among energy intensity, globalization, and financial development in major ASEAN economies. Energies, 13(4), 1?17. doi: 10.3390/en13040850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040850
    View in Google Scholar
23. Kamarudin, F., Nassir, A. M., Yahya, M. H., Said, R. M., & Nordin, B. A. A. (2014). Islamic banking sectors in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: analysis on revenue, cost and profit efficiency concepts. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, 35(2), 1?42.
    View in Google Scholar
24. Kamarudin, F., Nordin, B. A. A., & Nassir, A. M. (2013). Price efficiency and returns to scale of banking sector in Gulf Cooperative Council countries: empirical evidence from Islamic and conventional banks. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 47(3), 215?236.
    View in Google Scholar
25. Kamarudin, F., Sufian, F., & Nassir, A. M. (2016). Does country governance foster revenue efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks in GCC countries? EuroMed Journal of Business, 11(2), 181?211. doi: 10.1108/emjb-06-2015-0026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-06-2015-0026
    View in Google Scholar
26. Kamarudin, F., Zack, H. C., Sufian, F., & Anwar, N. A. M. (2017). Does productivity of Islamic banks endure progress or regress? Empirical evidence using Data Envelopment Analysis based Malmquist Productivity Index. Humanomics, 33(1), 84?118. doi: 10.1108/h-08-2016-0059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/H-08-2016-0059
    View in Google Scholar
27. Khan, W., Shaorong, S., & Ullah, I. (2017). Doing business with the poor: the rules and impact of the microfinance institutions. Economic Research, 30(1), 951?963. doi: 10.1080/1331677x.2017.1314790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1314790
    View in Google Scholar
28. Lebovics, M., Hermes, N., & Hudon, M. (2016). Are financial and social efficiency mutually exclusive? A case study of Vietnamese microfinance institutions. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 87(1), 55?77. doi: 10.1111/ap ce.12085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12085
    View in Google Scholar
29. McDonald, J. (2009). Using least squares and Tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(2), 792?798. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.039
    View in Google Scholar
30. Mia, M. A., & Ben Soltane, B. I. (2016). Productivity and its determinants in microfinance institutions (MFIs): evidence from South Asian countries. Economic Analysis and Policy, 51, 32?45. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2016.05.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2016.05.003
    View in Google Scholar
31. Mohsin, H. J., Ahmed, S. A., & Streimikiene, D. (2020). Evaluating the financial performance by considering the effect of external factors on organization cash flow. Contemporary Economics, 14(3), 406?414. doi: 10.5709/ce.1897-92544 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.413
    View in Google Scholar
32. Muda, M., Shaharuddin, A., & Embaya, A. (2013). Comparative analysis of profitability determinants of domestic and foreign Islamic banks in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(3), 559?569.
    View in Google Scholar
33. Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Mar Molinero, C. (2009). Social efficiency in microfinance institutions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(1), 104?119. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602527
    View in Google Scholar
34. Qayyum, A., & Ahmed, M. (2014). Efficiency and sustainability of micro finance institutions in South Asia. Research Journal Social Sciences, 3(1), 1?34.
    View in Google Scholar
35. Rauf, S. A., & Mahmood, T. (2009). Growth and performance of microfinance in Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 47(1), 99?122.
    View in Google Scholar
36. Saw, A. T. W., Kamarudin, F., & Latiff, A. S. A. (2020). Price efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks: evidence from panel data. International Journal of Economics and Management, 14(2), 301?310. doi: 10.1504/IJMEF.2018.095 743.
    View in Google Scholar
37. Sealey Jr, C. W., & Lindley, J. T. (1977). Inputs, outputs, and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions. Journal of Finance, 32(4), 1251?1266. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03324.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03324.x
    View in Google Scholar
38. Sell. F. L. (2020). Static and dynamic price effects motivated by innovation and imitation: novel insights using the Barone?s Curve. Contemporary Economics, 14(1), 73?89. doi: 10.5709/ce.1897-9254.333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.333
    View in Google Scholar
39. Shu, C. A., & Oney, B. (2014) Outreach and performance analysis of microfinance institutions in Cameroon. Economic Research, 27(1), 107?119. doi: 10.1080/1 331677x.2014.947108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2014.947108
    View in Google Scholar
40. Silva, A. C., & Chavez, G. A. (2015). Microfinance, country governance, and the global financial crisis. Venture Capital, 17(1-2), 191?213. doi: 10.1080/13691 066.2015.1021032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2015.1021032
    View in Google Scholar
41. Sufian, F., & Habibullah, M. S. (2012a). Globalization and bank efficiency nexus: symbiosis or parasites? Review of Development Finance, 2(3-4), 139?155. doi: 10.1016/j.rdf.2012.09.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2012.09.003
    View in Google Scholar
42. Sufian, F., & Habibullah, M.S. (2014). The impact of forced mergers and acquisitions on banks? total factor productivity: empirical evidence from Malaysia. Journal of the Asian Pacific Economy, 19(1), 151?185. doi: 10.1080/1354786 0.2013.818428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2013.818428
    View in Google Scholar
43. Sufian, F., & Kamarudin, F. (2014a). The impact of ownership structure on bank productivity and efficiency: evidence from Semi-Parametric Malmquist Productivity Index. Cogent Economics and Finance, 2(1), 1?27. doi: 10.1080/ 23322039.2014.932700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2014.932700
    View in Google Scholar
44. Sufian, F., & Kamarudin, F. (2014b). Efficiency and returns to scale in the Bangladesh banking sector: empirical evidence from the slack-based DEA method. Engineering Economics, 25(5), 549?557. doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.25.5.5035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.25.5.5035
    View in Google Scholar
45. Sufian, F., & Kamarudin, F. (2016). The impact of globalization on the performance of Banks in South Africa. Review of International Business and Strategy, 26(4), 517?542. doi: 10.1108/ribs-02-2016-0003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-02-2016-0003
    View in Google Scholar
46. Sufian, F., Kamarudin, F., & Md. Nassir, A. (2017). Globalization and bank efficiency nexus: empirical evidence from the Malaysian banking sector. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(5), 1269?1290. doi: 10.1108/bij-09-2014-0090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2014-0090
    View in Google Scholar
47. Villena-Serrano, M., Castro-López, R., Zagalaz-Sánchez, M. L., Cachón-Zagalaz, J. (2020). Analysis of the subjective well-being of the player of paddle. Journal of Sport Psychology, 29(1), 29?38.
    View in Google Scholar
48. Wagner, C., & Winkler, A. (2013). The vulnerability of microfinance to financial turmoil ? evidence from the global financial crisis. World Development, 51, 71?90. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.05.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.05.008
    View in Google Scholar
49. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817?838. doi: 10.230 7/1912934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934
    View in Google Scholar
50. Widiarto, I., & Emrouznejad, A. (2015). Social and financial efficiency of Islamic microfinance institutions: a Data Envelopment Analysis application. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 50, 1?17. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2014.12.0 01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2014.12.001
    View in Google Scholar
51. Wijesiri, M., & Meoli, M. (2015). Productivity change of microfinance institutions in Kenya: a bootstrap Malmquist approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 25, 115?121. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.04.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.04.004
    View in Google Scholar
52. Zainal, N., Nassir, A. M., Kamarudin, F., Siong Hook, L. S., Sufian, F., & Hussain, H. I. (2019). Social role of microfinance institutions in poverty eradication: evidence from ASEAN-5 Countries. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(2), 1551?1576.
    View in Google Scholar
53. Zainal, N., Nassir, A. M., Kamarudin, F., & Law, S. H. (2021). Does bank regulation and supervision impedes the efficiency of microfinance institutions to eradicate poverty? Evidence from ASEAN-5 countries. Studies in Economics and Finance, 38(2), 272?302. doi: 10.1108/sef-10-2019-0414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-10-2019-0414
    View in Google Scholar