Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Fostering Czech firms? innovation performance through efficient cooperation

Abstract

Research background: The business climate development and the stage of innovation systems? transformation are very similar in many Central and Eastern European countries, making it necessary to study these specific economies. These economies are at a different level of transformation, and their governments are trying to support the development of a knowledge-based economy, the creation of innovation systems, and collaboration among different types of entities. These governments need feedback in the form of research into the impacts of public funding on innovation activities through the influence of basic research and cooperation-based resources in individual countries.

Purpose of the article: This paper focuses on the examination of (i) the influence of national and European subsidies on innovation performance in manufacturing firms in the Czech Republic and (ii) impacts of knowledge- and cooperation-based resources on innovation activities in Czech manufacturing.

Methods: The latest available data from the Community Innovation Survey was used for analyses realized by different regression models. The proposed research models were gradually created to verify the influence of pro-innovation factors (expenditures on in-house and external R&D and on the acquisition of external tangible and intangible sources, cooperation with different partners and innovation) and public (national and/or European) funding of firms? innovation performance within the Czech manufacturing industry.

Findings and value added: The results have showed that there is a need to focus on direct and indirect effects of selected innovation determinants; we have also identified the crucial role of cooperation (specifically with government, public, or private research institutes) as a mediating variable within innovation processes. The results have also evidenced that public funding affects the efficiency of knowledge- and cooperation-based resources and amplifies the impact on firms? innovation performance differently. Whereas subsidies from national budgets do not significantly influence the innovation performance of Czech manufacturing firms, European subsidies, on the other hand, significantly increase firms? innovation performance. A long-term contribution of this paper is the significant completion of the theory of policy implications that may be applicable in a broad international context beyond the borders of the Czech Republic. This study significantly contributes to the ongoing discussion about (i) the significance of public financial subsidies from both national and European funds and (ii) the effects of cooperation and R&D on firms? innovation performance within ?catching-up? in Central and Eastern Europe. 

Keywords

public support of innovation, cooperation, national and European subsidies, manufacturing, R&D, regression models, Czech Republic

PDF

References

  1. Abubakar, A. M., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M. A., & Elc?i, A. (2019). Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), 104?114. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Appleyard, M. M., & Chesbrough, H. W. (2017). The dynamics of open strategy: from adoption to reversion. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 310?321. doi: 10.101 6/j.lrp.2016.07.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.07.004
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893?904. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2020). The role of R&D and knowledge spillovers in innovation and productivity. European Economic Review, 123, 103391. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103391
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Barbieri, L., Bragoli, D., Cortelezzi, F., & Marseguerra, G. (2020). Public funding and innovation strategies. Evidence from Italian SMEs. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 27(1), 111?134. doi: 10.1080/13571516.2019 .1664834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2019.1664834
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms?evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209?223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.003
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Berchicci, L. (2013). Towards an open R&D system: internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy, 42(1), 117?127. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Bigliardi, B., Dormio, A. I., Nosella, A., & Petroni, G. (2006). Assessing science parks' performances: directions from selected Italian case studies. Technovation, 26(4), 489?505. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.002
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Blažek, J., & Uhlíř, D. (2007). Regional innovation policies in the Czech Republic and the case of Prague: an emerging role of a regional level? European Planning Studies, 15(7), 871?888. doi: 10.1080/09654310701356175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701356175
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Booltink, L. W., & Saka-Helmhout, A. (2018). The effects of R&D intensity and internationalization on the performance of non-high-tech SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 36(1), 81?103. doi: 10.1177/0266242617707566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242617707566
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 442?457. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.008
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Caiazza, R., & Stanton, J. (2016). The effect of strategic partnership on innovation: an empirical analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 54, 208?212. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.05.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.05.016
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Chapman, G., Lucena, A., & Afcha, S. (2018). R&D subsidies & external collaborative breadth: differential gains and the role of collaboration experience. Research Policy, 47(3), 623?636. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.009
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Chatterjee, S., & Hadi, A. S. (2013). Regression analysis by example. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Chen, M. Y., Huang, M. J., & Cheng, J. Ch. (2009). Measuring knowledge management performance using a competitive perspective: an empirical study. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8449?8459. doi: 10.1016/j.es wa.2008.10.067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.067
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Chlebovský, V., Schüller, D., & Škapa, S. (2018). Are product innovation-oriented firms prepared for effective product customization? Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 44(1), 77?89.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: the construction of advantage. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 5?15. doi: 10.1007/s10961-005-5009-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5009-3
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Cruz-González, J., López-Sáez, P., EmilioNavas-López, J., & Delgado-Verde, M. (2014). Directions of external knowledge search: investigating their different impact on firm performance in high-technology industries. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(5), 847?866. doi: 10.1108/JKM-06-2014-0243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2014-0243
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Dachs, B., & Peters, B. (2014). Innovation, employment growth, and foreign ownership of firms: a European perspective. Research Policy, 43(1), 214?232. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.001
    View in Google Scholar
  20. De Tienne, D., & Mallette, P. (2012). Antecedents and outcomes of innovation-oriented cultures. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(18), 1?11. doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v7n18p1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n18p1
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Dong, Y., Wei, Z., Liu, T., & Xing, X. (2021). The impact of R&D intensity on the innovation performance of artificial intelligence enterprises-based on the moderating effect of patent portfolio. Sustainability, 13(1), 328. doi: 10.3390/su130 10328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010328
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Dvouletý, O., & Blažková, I. (2020). Determinants of competitiveness of the Czech SMEs: findings from the global competitiveness project. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 31(3), 361?378. doi: 10.1108/CR-01-2020-0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-01-2020-0007
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660?679. doi: 10.5465/amr.1998.1255632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.1255632
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Ehrenberger, M., Koudelková, P., & Strielkowski, W. (2015). Factors influencing innovation in small and medium enterprises in the Czech Republic. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 23(2), 73?83. doi: 10.3311/P Pso.7737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.7737
    View in Google Scholar
  25. European Commission (2020). European innovation scoreboard; internal market, industry, entrepreneurship and SMEs. Retrieved form https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/innovation/scoreboards_en (9.09.2020).
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Frenz, M, & Ietto-Gillies, G. (2009). The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: evidence from the UK community innovation survey. Research Policy, 38(7), 1125?1135. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.05.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.05.002
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Garcia Martinez, M., Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., & SánchezGarcía, M. (2014). Open innovation strategies in the food and drink industry: determinants and impact on innovation performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 66(2), 212?242. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2014.064588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2014.064588
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Gardiner, R., & Hajek, P. (2016). The role of innovative SMEs to the growth of regional economy: the case of the Czech Republic. In 13th international scientific conference on economic and social development. Book of proceedings, 630. Rijeka: Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K. (2016). Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: evidence from China. Research Policy, 45(6), 1129?1144. doi: 10.10 16/j.respol.2016.03.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.002
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Gustafsson, A., & Wogenius, S. (2014). Modelling apartment prices with the multiple linear regression model. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/sm ash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A725045&dswid=4329.
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Gyamfi, S., & Stejskal, J. (2019). Does external knowledge acquisition aid innovation performance in firms? In ECKM 2019 20th European conference on knowledge management 2 VOLS. Academic Conferences and publishing limited. 449?457.
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Hannen, J., Antons, D., Piller, F., Salge, T. O., Coltman, T., & Devinney, T. M. (2019). Containing the not-invented-here syndrome in external knowledge absorption and open innovation: the role of indirect countermeasures. Research Policy, 48(9), 103822. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103822
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42?54. doi: 10.1177/002224299806200303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200303
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Hussinger, K., & Wastyn, A. (2016). In search for the not?invented?here syndrome: the role of knowledge sources and firm success. R&D Management, 46(S3), 945?957. doi: 10.1111/radm.12136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12136
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Kafouros, M. I., & Forsans, N. (2012). The role of open innovation in emerging economies: do companies profit from the scientific knowledge of others? Journal of World Business, 47(3), 362?370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2011.05.004
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Keizer, J. A., Dijkstra, L., & Halman, J. I. (2002). Explaining innovative efforts of SMEs.: an exploratory survey among SMEs in the mechanical and electrical engineering sector in The Netherlands. Technovation, 22(1), 1?13. doi: 10.1016 /S0166-4972(00)00091-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00091-2
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Klímová, V. (2018). How do regions use indirect R&D support for their innovation activities? Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 42(1), 104?115.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Klímová, V., Žítek, V., & Králová, M. (2019). How public R&D support affects research activity of enterprises: evidence from the Czech Republic. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11, 888?907. doi: 10.1007/s13132-019-0580-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-0580-2
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Knell, M., & Srholec, M. (2005). Innovation cooperation and foreign ownership in the Czech Republic. Norwegian Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU-STEP).
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Kotkova Striteska, M., & Prokop, V. (2020). Dynamic innovation strategy model in practice of innovation leaders and followers in CEE countries ? a prerequisite for building innovative ecosystems. Sustainability, 12(9), 3918. doi: 10.339 0/su12093918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093918
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Kraśnicka, T., Głód, W., & Wronka-Pośpiech, M. (2018). Management innovation, pro-innovation organisational culture and enterprise performance: testing the mediation effect. Review of Managerial Science, 12(3), 737?769. doi: 10.1007 /s11846-017-0229-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0229-0
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Lavčák, M., Hudec, O., & Sinčáková, Ž. (2019). Local and institutional factors of start-up ecosystems: common and inherited attributes. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10(4), 1765?1783. doi: 10.1007/s13132-019-00598-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00598-0
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Lee, K., Woo, H. G., & Joshi, K. (2017). Pro-innovation culture, ambidexterity and new product development performance: polynomial regression and response surface analysis. European Management Journal, 35(2), 249?260. doi: 10.1016 /j.emj.2016.05.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.05.002
    View in Google Scholar
  44. McKelvie, A., Brattström, A., & Wennberg, K. (2017). How young firms achieve growth: reconciling the roles of growth motivation and innovative activities. Small Business Economics, 49, 273?293. doi: 10.1007/s11187-017-9847-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9847-9
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Meričková, B., Prokop, V., & Stejskal, J. (2016). Consequences of enterprises´ cooperation within the innovation process - case study of the Czech Machinery Industry. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 19(3), 110?122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2016-3-008
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Myšková, R., & Kuběnka, M. (2019). Information sharing in the context of business cooperation?as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of International Studies, 12(3), 169?182. doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.2019/12-3/14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2019/12-3/14
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Nemec, J. (2015). Public policy in the Czech Republic. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 9(1), 4?6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cejpp-2016-0001
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Odei, S. A., Stejskal, J., & Prokop, V. (2020). Revisiting the factors driving firms? innovation performances: the case of Visegrad countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, 1?14. doi: 10.1007/s13132-020-00669-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00669-7
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Patel, P. C., Fernhaber, S. A., McDougall-Covin, P. P., & van der Have, R. P. (2014). Beating competitors to international markets: the value of geographically balanced networks for innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 35(5), 691?711. doi: 10.1002/smj.2114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2114
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Pisár, P., Ďurčeková, I., & Stachová, M. (2020). The contribution of innovation actors into business R&D funding?does the substitution effect of public support work in the EU? E+M Ekonomie a Management, 23(1), 121?134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2020-1-009
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Procházka, O., & Hájek, P. (2015). Modelling knowledge management processes using fuzzy cognitive maps. In 10th International conference on knowledge management in organizations. Springer, 41?50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21009-4_4
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Prokop, V., & Stejskal, J. (2014). Impacts of local planning to competitiveness index change ? using approximate initial analysis to the Czech regions. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 12(1), 279?288.
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Prokop, V., & Stejskal, J. (2019). Determinants of innovation activities and SME absorption?Case study of Germany. Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration. 46(2), 134?146.
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Prokop, V., Odei, S. A., & Stejskal, J. (2018). Propellants of University-Industry-Government synergy: comparative study of Czech and Slovak manufacturing industries. Ekonomický časopis, 66(10), 987?1001.
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Prokop, V., Stejskal, J., Klimova, V., & Zitek, V. (2021). The role of foreign technologies and R&D in innovation processes within catching-up CEE countries. Plos one, 16(4), e0250307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250307
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Prokop, V., Stejskal, J., & Kuvikova, H. (2017). The different drivers of innovation activities in European countries: a comparative study of Czech, Slovak, and Hungarian manufacturing firms. Ekonomický časopis, 65(1), 31?45.
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Pucci, T., Brumana, M., Minola, T., & Zanni, L. (2020). Social capital and innovation in a life science cluster: the role of proximity and family involvement. Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 205?227. doi: 10.1007/s10961-017-9591-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9591-y
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Radosevic, S. (1999). Transformation of science and technology systems into systems of innovation in central and eastern Europe: the emerging patterns and determinants. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 10(3?4), 277?320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(99)00016-8
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Radosevic, S. (2002). Regional innovation systems in Central and Eastern Europe: determinants, organizers and alignments. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 87?96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013152721632
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Rašula, J., Vukšić, V. B., & Štemberger, M. I. (2012). The impact of knowledge management on organisational performance. Economic and Business Review, 14(2), 147?168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15458/2335-4216.1207
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Rayna, T., Striukova, L., & Darlington, J. (2015). Co-creation and user innovation: The role of online 3D printing platforms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 37, 90?102. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.07.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.07.002
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Retherford, R. D., & Choe, M. K. (2011). Statistical models for causal analysis. New York: John Wiley.
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Rim, G. N., Kim, G. S., Hwang, S. H., & Ko, U. D. (2019). Some problems in statistically assessing the level of knowledge economy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10(3), 974?996. doi: 10.1007/s13132-017-0510-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0510-0
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Roper, S., Love, J. H., & Bonner, K. (2017). Firms? knowledge search and local knowledge externalities in innovation performance. Research Policy, 46(1), 43?56. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.004
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Santi, C., & Santoleri, P. (2017). Exploring the link between innovation and growth in Chilean firms. Small Business Economics, 49(2), 445?467. doi: 10.10 07/s11187-016-9836-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9836-4
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Shaikh, I. A., & O?Connor, G. C. (2020). Understanding the motivations of technology managers in radical innovation decisions in the mature R&D firm context: an agency theory perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 55, 101553. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101553
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Sofka, W., & Grimpe, C. (2010). Specialized search and innovation performance?evidence across Europe. R&D Management, 40(3), 310?323. doi: 10.1111/j.14 67-9310.2010.00592.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00592.x
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Stejskal, J., & Hájek, P. (2015). Modelling knowledge spillover effects using moderated and mediation analysis ? the case of Czech high-tech industries. In 10th International conference on knowledge management in organizations. 224, 329?341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21009-4_25
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Stejskal, J., Hájek, P., & Hudec, O. (Eds.). (2018). Knowledge spillovers in regional innovation systems: a case study of CEE regions. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67029-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67029-4
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Stojčić, N. (2021). Collaborative innovation in emerging innovation systems: evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(2), 531?562. doi: 10.1007/s10961-020-09792-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09792-8
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Stulova, V., & Rungi, M. (2017). Untangling the mystery of absorptive capacity: a process or a set of success factors? Journal of High Technology Management Research, 28(1), 110?123. doi: 10.1016/j.hitech.2017.04.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2017.04.008
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Sum, N. L., & Jessop, B. (2013). Competitiveness, the knowledge-based economy and higher education. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(1), 24?44. doi: 10.1007/s13132-012-0121-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0121-8
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Szücs, F. (2020). Do research subsidies crowd out private R&D of large firms? Evidence from European Framework Programmes. Research Policy, 49(3), 103923. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.103923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103923
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Vásquez-Urriago, Á. R., Barge-Gil, A., & Rico, A. M. (2016). Science and technology parks and cooperation for innovation: empirical evidence from Spain. Research Policy, 45(1), 137?147. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.006
    View in Google Scholar
  75. Vlachogianni, A., Kassomenos, P., Karppinen, A., Karakitsios, S., & Kukkonen, J. (2011). Evaluation of a multiple regression model for the forecasting of the concentrations of NOx and PM10 in Athens and Helsinki. Science of the Total Environment, 409(8), 1559?1571. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.040
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Westlund, H., & Nilsson, E. (2005). Measuring enterprises? investments in social capital: a pilot study. Regional Studies, 39(8), 1079?1094. doi: 10.1080/00343 400500328164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400500328164
    View in Google Scholar
  77. Wu, C. H., Li, J. B., & Chang, T. Y. (2013). SLinRA2S: a simple linear regression analysis assisting system. In e-Business engineering (ICEBE), 2013 IEEE 10th international conference. IEEE, 219?223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEBE.2013.33
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Yang, J., & Grabe, M. E. (2011). Knowledge acquisition gaps: a comparison of print versus online news sources. New Media & Society, 13(8), 1211?1227. doi: 10.1177/1461444811401708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811401708
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 372

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.