Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

What affects employment by NGOs? Counteraction to precarious employment in the Polish non-profit sector in the perspective of COVID-19 pandemic crises

Abstract

Research background: The precarious employment in non-governmental organizations has not been the subject of thorough scientific considerations so far. Meanwhile, the dominance of flexible forms of employment in an organization evokes a sense of instability, insecurity and uncertainty among employees. It weakens the relationship between staff and the organization, which, by not providing employees with prospects for permanent employment, creates a threat to its own development. The COVID-19 pandemic is reinforcing these fears as the situation in the labour market continues to deteriorate.

Purpose of the article: The purpose of this study is to identify the factors affecting NGOs employment of contract employees, as a key condition for crowding out precarious employment.

Methods: Logistic regression analysis was conducted based on a national representative survey of 1500 Polish NGOs.

Findings & value added: Its results indicate that NGOs are increasing the employment of contract staff in order to cope with the excessive bureaucracy of public administration. A stimulating impact on employment is also provided by difficulties in maintaining good staff and volunteers, as well as when there is no sense of security in running an organization. In turn, the lack of people ready to selflessly get involved in an organization's activities, as well as difficulties in accessing premises appropriate to NGOs both reduce the desire among staff to be employed full-time. The monitoring of precarious employment (PE) in NGOs is of key importance in the shaping and effectiveness of national policies aimed at improving the living standards of society as a whole. NGOs are an important element, as they fill the gaps remaining in the implementation of such policies. In the long term, improving the quality of full-time employment in such entities by reducing the barriers to their activity will increase their potential for fulfilling their social mission. To date, such barriers and their relation to employment have not been considered in research literature. However, a considerable proportion of employees in the Polish NGO sector may join the ranks of those excluded from employment and deprived of income due to the crisis on the job market caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This article contributes to the existing literature and practice by identifying the influence of wide spectrum of barriers of NGOs activity on permanent employment.

Keywords

contract employees, precarious employment, barriers to activity, NGOs

PDF

References

  1. Ahmed, F., Ahmed, N., Pissarides, C., Stiglitz, J. (2020). Why inequality could spread COVID-19. Lancet Public Health, 5(5). doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20) 30085-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30085-2
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Andrzejczak, A. (2015). Dilemmas of education for sustainable development. In I. Gorges (Ed.). Global perspectives on sustainable regional development. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac GMBH Hamburg,185?211.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Anheier, H. K., Lang, M., & Toepler, S. (2019). Civil society in times of change: shrinking, changing and expanding spaces and the need for new regulatory approaches. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 13(8), 1?27. doi: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2019-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2019-8
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, L., Bluitt-Fisher, J., Lopez-Newman, L., Paul, D. R., & Paul, K. R. (2009). Nonprofits in crisis: how to retain employees in the nonprofit sector. UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones, 810. doi: 10.34917/2150726.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Bach-Mortensen, A. M., Lange, B. C., & Montgomery, P. (2018). Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based interventions among third sector organisations: a systematic review. Implementation Science, 13(1), 1?19. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0789-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0789-7
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Baciu, L. (2014). From independence to strength: institutional resilience and coping mechanisms in NGOs providing social services financed through public financing mechanisms. From Person to Society, 773.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Batti, R. C. (2014). Challenges facing local NGOs in resource mobilization. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 57?64. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20140203.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20140203.12
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Beunen, R., & Patterson, J. J. (2019). Analysing institutional change in environmental governance: exploring the concept of ?institutional work?. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(1), 12?29. doi: 10.1080/09640 568.2016.1257423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1257423
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2004). The enabling environment for implementing the millennium development goals: government actions to support NGOs. Paper presented at The Role of NGOs in Implementing the Millennium Development Goals conference, George Washington University, Washington D.C. 12-13 May. Retrieved form https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1. 1.465.4500&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Brown, W., Yoshioka, C. F., & Munoz, P. (2004). Organizational mission as a core dimension in employee retention. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 22(2), 28?43.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Čada, K., & Ptáčková, K. (2017). The domestication of financial objects: narrativisation, appropriation and affectivation. Sociologicky Casopis, 53(6), 857?879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2017.53.6.378
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, S., DiGiuseppe, M., & Murdie, A. (2019). International development NGOs and bureaucratic capacity: facilitator or destroyer? Political Research Quarterly, 72(1), 3?18. doi: 10.1177/1065912918772941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918772941
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Carré, F., Negrete, R., & Vanek, J. (2016). Relating quality of employment to informal employment. WIEGO Working Paper, 5.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Charycka, B., & Gumkowska, M. (2019). Kondycja organizacji pozarządowych. Warszawa: Stowarzyszenie Klon/Jawor.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Cho, Y. J., & Lewis, G. B. (2012). Turnover intention and turnover behavior: implications for retaining federal employees. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(1), 4?23. doi: 10.1177/0734371X11408701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X11408701
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Das, B., & Baruah, M. (2013). Employee retention: a review of literature. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 14, 08-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-1420816
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Davies, B. (2013). Financial sustainability and funding diversification: the challenge for Indonesian NGOs. Retrieved from https://www.ksi-indonesia.org/as set s/uploads/original/2020/02/ksi-1580493181.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Davis, J. M., Henson, S., & Swiss, L. (2020). In INGOs we trust? How individual determinants and the framing of INGOs influences public trust. Development in Practice, 30(6), 809?824. doi: 10.1080/09614524.2020.1801593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2020.1801593
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Deitrick, L., Tinkler, T., Young, E., Strawser, C. C., Meschen, C., Manriques, N., & Beatty, B. (2020). Nonprofit sector response to COVID-19. Nonprofit Sector Issues and Trends. 4. Retrieved from https://digital.sandiego.edu/npi-npissues/4.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. DeVaro, J., & Brookshire, D. (2007). Promotions and incentives in nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Ilr Review, 60(3), 311?339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390706000301
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Díaz, D. A. (2020). NGOs on coronavirus mode: the risks of ?business as usual. EInternational Relations. Retrieved form https://www.e-ir.info/pdf/83179.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Divya, M. S., & Sreedhara, T. N. ( 2014). Human resource challenges in non-governmental organizations (NGOs). International Journal of Scientific Research, 3(12), 167?168. doi: 10.36106/IJSR. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36106/ijsr
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Doh, J. P., & Teegen, H. (2002). Nongovernmental organizations as institutional actors in international business: theory and implications. International Business Review, 11(6), 665?684. doi: 10.1016/S0969-5931(02)00044-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(02)00044-6
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Draca, M., & Green, C. (2004). The incidence and intensity of employer funded training: Australian evidence on the impact of flexible work. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51(5), 609?625. doi: 10.1111/j.0036-9292.2004.00323.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0036-9292.2004.00323.x
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Eikenberry, A. M., Arroyave, V., & Cooper, T. (2007). Administrative failure and the international NGO response to Hurricane Katrina. Public Administration Review, 67, 160?170. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00825.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00825.x
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Eurofound (2020). Living, working and COVID-19, COVID-19 series. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Eurostat (2017). Temporary employment in the EU, product Eurostat news. Retrieved form https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/productseurostat-news/-/ddn-20170502-1.
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Finchum-Mason, E. A., Husted, K., Mary Kay Gugerty, M. K. G., & Barnhart, E. M. (2020). Local impacts of a global crisis: how Washington state nonprofits are responding to COVID-19. Nancy Bell Evans Center on Nonprofits & Philanthropy.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Fowler, A. (2011). Development NGOs. Oxford Handbook of Civil Society, 42?54. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398571.013.0004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398571.003.0004
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Frontera (2007). Motivating staff and volunteers working in NGOs in the South. Retrieved from https://silo.tips/download/motivating-staff-and-volunteers-working-in-ngos-in-the-south.
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Ganesh, S., & McAllum, K. (2012). Volunteering and professionalization: trends in tension? Management Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 152?158. doi: 10.1177 /0893318911423762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911423762
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Gilstrap, C. M., Schall, S., & Gilstrap, C. A. (2019). Stress in international work: stressors and coping strategies of RNGO international directors. Communication Quarterly, 67(5), 506?525. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2019 .1668441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2019.1668441
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Goldring, L., & Landolt, P. (2009). The index of precarious work (IPW). A measure to track progress towards decent work. Immigrants and precarious employment. Brief One. Toronto: Immigrants and Precarious Employment. Project.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Goyal, S. (2015). A theoretical analysis of precarious job market in India and its various impacts. Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 03(06). doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1258076.
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Gr?nbjerg, K. A., McAvoy, E., & Habecker, K. (2020). Indiana non-profit organisations and COVID-19: impact on services, finances and staffing. Retrieved form https://nonprofit.indiana.edu/doc/publications/covid-19-impact.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/204080520X16009766578527
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Gunn, V., H?kansta, C., Vignola, E., Matilla-Santander, N., Kreshpaj, B., Wegman, D. H., & Bodin, T. (2021). Initiatives addressing precarious employment and its effects on workers? health and well-being: a protocol for a systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1?11. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01728-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01728-z
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Hancock, J., Allen, D., Bosco, F., McDaniel, K., & Pierce, C. (2013). Meta-analytic review of employee turnover as a predictor of firm performance. Journal of Management, 39(3), 573?603. doi: 10.1177/0149206311424943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311424943
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Harir, M. (2015). Challenges faced by NGOs in mobilization of funds for operation: the case of United Nations Environmental Programme. (UNEP). Retrieved from http://41.204.183.105/bitstream/handle/11732/1486/Mymunah.pd f?seque nce=4&isAllowed=y.
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Harris, D., & Kor, Y. (2013). The role of human capital in scaling social entrepreneurship. Journal of Management for Global Sustainability, 1(2), 163?172. doi: 10.13185/JM2013.01210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13185/JM2013.01210
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Hersberger?Langloh, S. E., Stühlinger, S., & von Schnurbein, G. (2021). Institutional isomorphism and nonprofit managerialism: for better or worse? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 31(3), 461?480. doi: 10.1002/n ml.21441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21441
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Huntley, R. (2019). Volunteering benefits our community and society, but rates are declining, ABC Life. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/life/benefits-of-volunteering-to-community-and-society/11075998.
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Keating, V. C., & Thrandardottir, E. (2017). NGOs, trust, and the accountability agenda. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(1), 134?151. doi: 10.1177/1369148116682655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116682655
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Lee, T., Johnson, E., & Prakash, A. (2012). Media independence and trust in NGOs: the case of postcommunist countries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(1), 8?35. doi: 10.1177/0899764010384444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010384444
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Lopez, G., Kriebel, D., Cifuentes, M., & Quinn, M. (2021). Effects of precarious work on symptomatology of anxiety and depression in Chilean workers, a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1?11. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10952-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10952-0
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Luppi, F., Rosina, A., & Sironi, E. (2021). On the changes of the intention to leave the parental home during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison among five European countries. Genus, 77(1), 1?23. doi: 10.1186/s41118-021-00117-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-021-00117-7
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Matilla-Santander, N., Ahonen, E., Albin, M., Baron, S., Bolíbar, M., & Bosmans, K. (2021). All members of the PWR study consortium. COVID-19 and precarious employment: consequences of the evolving crisis. International Journal of Health Services, 51(2), 226?228. doi: 10.1177/0020731420986694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731420986694
    View in Google Scholar
  47. McDonald, C. (1997). Government, funded nonprofits, and accountability. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 8(1), 51-64. doi: 10.1002/nml.413 0080106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130080106
    View in Google Scholar
  48. McGann, J., & Johnstone, M. (2005). The power shift and NGO cedibility crisis. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11(2), 159?172.
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Mikołajczak, P. (2017). Źródła i instrumenty finansowania przedsiębiorstw społecznych. Poznań: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu.
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Mikołajczak, P. (2021). How do barriers to the activities of social enterprises affect their financial situation? Evidence based on data from Poland and resource mobilization theory. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1108/JEEE-07-2020-0217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-07-2020-0217
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Mikołajczak, P. (2018). The impact of the diversification of revenues on NGOs? commercialization: evidence from Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(4), 761?779. doi: 10.24136/eq.2018.037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.037
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Mikołajczak, P., & Bajak, P. (2021). Does NGOs? commercialization affect volunteer work? The crowding out or crowding in effect. Public Organization Review, 21, 103?118. doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00478-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00478-1
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Munn, J. (2018). Employee retention using nonfinancial means: addressing human resource challenges for nonprofits. American Journal of Management, 15, 74?87.
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Mymunah, H. (2015). Challenges faced by NGOs in mobilization of funds for operation: the case of United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). Doctoral dissertation, United States International University-Africa.
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Nätti, J. (1993). Temporary employment in the Nordic countries: a trap or a bridge. Work, Employment and Society, 7(3), 451?464. doi: 10.1177/0950017 09373006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095001709373006
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Nisar, Q. A., Imran, A., Othman, N. B., Kamil, B. A. B. M., & Marchalina, L. (2017). Do leaders? emotional labor strategies influence the leaders? emotional exhaustion? Moderating role of emotional intelligence: longitudinal study on NGOs. Advanced Science Letters, 23(9), 8131?8137. doi: 10.1166/asl.2017. 9848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9848
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Njoh, A. J. (2011). Municipal councils, international NGOs and citizen participation in public infrastructure development in rural settlements in Cameroon. Habitat International, 35(1), 101?110. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.04 .001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.04.001
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Novakova, N. (2020). Civil society in Central Europe: threats and ways forward. German Marshall Fund of the United States.
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Olding, M., Barker, A., McNeil, R., & Boyd, J. (2021). Essential work, precarious labour: the need for safer and equitable harm reduction work in the era of COVID-19. International Journal of Drug Policy, 90, 103076. doi: 10.1016/j.dr ugpo.2020.103076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103076
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Padrosa, E., Bolíbar, M., Juli?, M., & Benach, J. (2021). Comparing precarious employment across countries: measurement invariance of the employment precariousness scale for Europe (EPRES-E). Social Indicators Research, 154(3), 893?915. doi: 10.1007/s11205-020-02539-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02539-w
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Pelucha, M., Kourilova, J., & Kveton, V. (2017). Barriers of social entrepreneurship development ? a case study of the Czech Republic. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 129?148. doi: 10.1080/19420676.2017.1313303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2017.1313303
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Pospíšil, M., & Hyánek, V. (2009). Country-specific situation of the nonprofit sector in the Czech Republic. Unpublished manuscript, CVNS.
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Pranoto, E. (2020). Non goverment organization and the authority state of forcing. In International conference on law, economics and health (ICLEH 2020). Atlantis Press, 67?73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200513.014
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Randle, M. & Dolnicar, S. (2011), Self-congruity and volunteering: a multi-organisation comparison. European Journal of Marketing, 45(5), 739?758. doi: 10.1108/03090561111120019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111120019
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Ritvo, R. A., Berdzenishvili, G., Khazalia, N., Khidesheli, M., Liqokeli, A., & Samkharadze, S. (2013). Public attitudes toward non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the Republic of Georgia. International NGO Journal, 8(1), 13?19. DOI: 10.5897/INGOJ12.0100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/INGOJ12.0100
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A. (2004). From - Hindu growth to productivity surge: the mystery of the Indian growth transition. IMF Working Paper, WP/04/77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451850024.001
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Schierup, C. U. (2016). Under the rainbow: migration, precarity and people power in post-apartheid South Africa. Critical Sociology, 42(7-8), 1051?1068. doi: 10.1177/0896920515621118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920515621118
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Schoebel, V., Wayment, C., Gaiser, M., Page, C., Buche, J., & Beck, A. J. (2021). Telebehavioral health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative analysis of provider experiences and perspectives. Telemedicine and e-Health, 27(8), 947?954. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0121
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Schoon, I., & Bynner, J. (2019). Young people and the great recession: variations in the school-to-work transition in Europe and the United States. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 10(2), 153?173. doi: 10.1332/175795919X155144 56677349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/175795919X15514456677349
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Scott, I., Yeld, N., & Hendry, J. (2007). Higher education monitor: a case for improving teaching and learning in South African higher education. Council on Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.che.ac.za/sites/default/fil es/publications/HEMonitor6-ITLS Oct20070.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Shaw, J., Park, T., & Kim, E. (2013). A resource-based perspective on human capital losses, HRM investments, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 572?589. doi: 10.1002/smj.2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2025
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Siddique, M. H. (2009). NGO field workers in Pakistan. Economia. Seria Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, 12(1), 55?78.
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Skandrani, H., Kooli, K., Doudech, N. (2021). Inhibitors of non-for-profit organisations? activities and survival in a crisis context. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1108/QMR-03-2020-0039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-03-2020-0039
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Snelgar, R., Shelton, S., & Giesser, A. (2017). A comparison of South Africa and German, extrinsic and intricsic motivation. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 20(1), 1?12. doi: 10.4102/sajems.v20i1.1552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v20i1.1552
    View in Google Scholar
  75. Spyridakis, M. (2019). Living in precariousness: the minimum guaranteed income in Crisis. Ethnographies of Urbanity in Flux: Theoretical Reflections, 10(3), 69?80.
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: the new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849664554
    View in Google Scholar
  77. Stefanick, L., Best-Bertwistle, R., & Race, L. S. (2020). Retaining volunteers in the age of precarious work. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 32(2), 124?146. doi: 10.1080/10495142.2018.1526747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2018.1526747
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Suykens, B., George, B., De Rynck, F., & Verschuere, B. (2020). Determinants of non-profit commercialism. Resource deficits, institutional pressures or organizational contingencies? Public Management Review. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2020.1764083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1764083
    View in Google Scholar
  79. Tataryn, A. (2020). Re-conceptualizing labor law in an era of migration and precarity. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 16(3), 477?498. doi: 10.1177/174387 2116683381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872116683381
    View in Google Scholar
  80. Tierney, A., & Boodoosingh, R. (2020). Challenges to NGOs? ability to bid for funding due to the repatriation of volunteers: the case of Samoa. World Development, 136, 105113. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105113
    View in Google Scholar
  81. Trappmann, V. (2011). Precarious employment in Poland?a legacy of transition or an effect of European integration? Employment and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe, 2(1), 1?22.
    View in Google Scholar
  82. Tremblay-Boire, J., & Prakash, A. (2017). Will you trust me? How individual American donors respond to informational signals regarding local and global humanitarian charities. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(2), 621?647. doi: 10.1007/s11266-016-9782-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9782-4
    View in Google Scholar
  83. Trlifajová, L., & Hurrle, J. (2019). Work must pay: does it? Precarious employment and employment motivation for low-income households. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(3), 376?395. doi: 10.1177/0958928718805870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928718805870
    View in Google Scholar
  84. Valero, E., Martin, U., Bacigalupe, A., & Utzet, M. (2020). The impact of precarious jobs on mental health: a gender-sensitive literature review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental, 94(4),577?589 doi: 10.1007/s00 420-020-01605-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01605-7
    View in Google Scholar
  85. van Wijk, D. C., de Valk, H. A., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2021). Temporary employment and family formation: an income or insecurity effect? European Sociological Review, 37(4), 641?658. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcab007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcab007
    View in Google Scholar
  86. Vasan, S. (2004). NGOs as employers. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(22), 2197?2198.
    View in Google Scholar
  87. Viravaidya, M., & Hayssen, J. (2001). Strategies to strengthen NGO capacity in resource mobilization through business activities (p. 1). UNAIDS Best Practice Collection: PDA and UNAIDS joint publication.
    View in Google Scholar
  88. Warner, S., Newland, B. L., & Green, B. C. (2011). More than motivation: reconsidering volunteer management tools. Journal of Sport Management, 25(5), 391?407. doi: 10.1123/jsm.25.5.391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.25.5.391
    View in Google Scholar
  89. Will, M. G., & Pies, I. (2017). Discourse failures and the NGO sector: how campaigning can undermine advocacy. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28, 1078?1109. doi: 10.1007/s11266-016-9770-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9770-8
    View in Google Scholar
  90. Wojčák, E., & Baráth, M. (2017). National culture and application of telework in Europe. European Journal of Business Science and Technology, 3(1), 65?74. doi: 10.11118/ejobsat.v3i1.79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11118/ejobsat.v3i1.79
    View in Google Scholar
  91. Word, J. K., & Sowa, J. E. (Eds.). (2017). The nonprofit human resource management handbook: From theory to practice. Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315181585
    View in Google Scholar
  92. Zaman, K. (2011). Relationship between rewards and employee motivation in the nonprofit organizations of Pakistan. Business Intelligence Journal, 4, 327?334.
    View in Google Scholar
  93. Zimmer, A., & Pahl, B. (2018). Barriers to third sector development. In The third sector as a renewable resource for Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-71473-8_5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71473-8_5
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 127

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.