Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

New trends in codes of ethics: Czech business ethics preferences by the dawn of COVID-19

Abstract

Research background: The morality and sustainability depend upon the active engagement of all stakeholders. Businesses might have to observe minimum standards via their corporate social responsibility (CSR), but this does not imply any mandatory and enforceable requirements for their internal documents. Crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic magnify differences and might impact the perception and commitment to ethics and modify preferences.

Purpose of the article: Since it is up to each and every business whether it will issue Codes of Ethics or Codes of Conduct (Codes) and how they will project ethical principles, values and concerns in them, it is both illuminative and instrumental to conduct a massive theoretical and literature review, to identify five aspects for exploration of  Codes: (i) human nature (ii) moral values (iii) ethical principles, (iv) reasoning and (v) sustainability pillars, and to perform such an exploration via a case study at the dawn of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Based on a massive theoretical and literature review, five aspects for exploration have been identified and employed in a case study involving twenty Codes of the largest Czech businesses, while focusing on their preferences. This is to be achieved by a holistic advanced content analysis employing meta-analysis and manual Delphi method with Likert scoring by a panel of experts.

Findings & value added: The case study reveals that generally Codes prefer (i) Socrates´ perception of human nature, (ii) respect and responsibility as moral values, (iii) the principle of solidarity, (iv) social contract and deontological reasoning and (v) the sustainability social pillar. These findings demonstrate discrepancies and inconsistencies between and also within  these Codes, which often paternalistically reject the multi-stakeholder approach that is needed to overcome COVID-19. This litigates for the appropriateness of this new methodology and encourages further longitudinal case studies entailing more jurisdictions and industries.

Keywords

K20, L21, M14, Q56

PDF

References

  1. Abend, G. (2013). The origins of business ethics in American universities, 1902-1936. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(2), 171?205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201323214
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Adelstein, J., & Clegg, S. (2016). Code of ethics: a stratified vehicle for compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 53?66. doi: 10.1007%2Fs10551-015-2581-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2581-9
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Allen, E., & Seaman, Ch. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress, 64?65. doi: 10.12691/ajnr-1-1-1.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2011). Do ethics matter? Tax compliance and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 635?651. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0761-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0761-9
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Areeda, P. E. (1996). The Socratic method. Harvard Law Review, 109, 911?922.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Armani, A. M., Hurt, D. E., Hwang, D., McCarthy, M. C., & Scholtz, A. (2020). Low-tech solutions for the COVID-19 supply chain crisis. Natural Review Materials, 5(6), 403?406. doi: 10.1038/s41578-020-0205-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-0205-1
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Arora, B., Kourula, A., & Phillips, R. (2020). Emerging paradigms of corporate social responsibility, regulation, and governance: introduction to the thematic symposium. Journal of Business Ethics, 162, 265?268. doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04236-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04236-2
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Ashford, N. A., Hall, R. P. Arango-Quiroga, J., Metaxas, K. A., & Showalter, A. L. (2020). Addressing inequality: the first step beyond COVID-19 and towards Sustainability. Sustainability, 12(13), 5404. doi: 10.3390/su12135404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135404
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Babri, M., Davidson, B., & Helin, S. (2019). An updated inquiry into the study of corporate codes of ethics: 2005-2016. Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 71?108. doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04192-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04192-x
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Bambrough, R. (2011). The philosophy of Aristotle. New York, U.S.: Signet Classics.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Balcerzak, A., & MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2020). Projection of SDGs in codes of ethics ? case study about lost in translation? Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 95. doi: 10.3390/admsci10040095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040095
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Banerjee, B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: the good, the bad and the igly. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847208552.00008
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Belén Lozano, M., Martínez, B., & Pindado, J. (2016). Corporate governance, ownership and firm value: drivers of ownership as a good corporate governance mechanism. International Business Review, 25(6), 1333?1343. doi: 10.3390/ijfs 8020020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.04.005
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Berkey, B. (2021). Rawlsian institutionalism and business ethics: does it matter whether corporations are part of the basic structure of society? Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(2), 179?209. doi: 10.1017/beq.2020.14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2020.14
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Blowfield, M., & Murray, A. (2008). Corporate responsibility: a critical introduction. Oxford: University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27?40. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Bowie, E. N. (2013). Business ethics in the 21st Century. New York: Springer DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6223-7
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Bradley, B. (2006). Two concepts of intrinsic value. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 9, 111?130. doi: 10.1007/s10677-006-9009-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-006-9009-7
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Calderón, R., Ferrero, I., & Redin, D. (2012). Ethical codes and corporate responsibility of the most admired companies of the world: toward a third generation ethics? Business and Politics, 14(4), 1?24. doi: 10.1515/bap-2012-0044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2012-0044
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Calvo, N., & Calvo-Babío, F.( 2018). Corporate social responsibility and multiple agency theory: a case study of internal stakeholder engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, 1223?1230. doi: 10.10 02/csr.1633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1633
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll?s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1, 3. doi: 10.1186/s40991-016-000 4-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Cerchia, R. E., & Piccolo, K. (2019). The ethical consumer and codes of ethics in the fashion industry. Laws, 8, 23. doi: 10.3390/laws8040023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws8040023
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Chassé, S., & Courrent, J. M. (2018). Linking owner-managers? personal sustainability behaviors and corporate practices in SMEs: the moderating roles of perceived advantages and environmental hostility. Business Ethics, 27, 127?173. doi: 10.1111/beer.12176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12176
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Chen, J., Liu, J., Qin, J. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and capacity selection. Transformations in Business & Economics, 18, 3C (48C), 530?545.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Clark, C. E., Steckler, E. L., & Newell, S. (2016). Managing contradiction: stockholder and stakeholder views of the firm as paradoxical opportunity. Business and Society Review, 121, 123?59. doi: 10.1111/basr.12083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12083
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Coatney, K., & Poliak, M. (2020). Cognitive decision-making algorithms, Internet of Things smart devices, and sustainable organizational performance in Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 8(4), 9?18. doi: 10.22381/JSME8420201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22381/JSME8420201
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Colander, D. (2016). Creating humble economists: a code of ethics for economists. In F. DeMartino & D. McCloskey (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of professional economic ethics. Oxford: Edward Elgar, 737?749.
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Collins, D. (2012). Business ethics: how to design and manage ethical organizations. West Sussex: John Wiley.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Cotterrell, R. (2000). Common law approaches to the relationship between law and morality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 3, 9?26. doi: 10.1023/A:1009935 831906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009935831906
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage Publication.
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Crifo, P., & Forget, V. D. (2015). The economics of corporate social responsibility: a firm-level perspective survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(1), 112?130. doi: 10.1111/joes.12055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12055
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Cunningham, E. (2021). Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, sustainable organizational performance, and automated production systems in big data-driven smart urban economy. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 9(1), 31?41. doi: 10.22381/jsme9120213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22381/jsme9120213
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Černek, M., Horváthová, P., & Kashi, K. (2014). Ethic perception in business and social practice in the Czech Republic. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 9(4), 646?659.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. D´Adamo, I., & Lupi, G. (2021). Sustainability and resilience after COVID-19: a circular premium in the fashion industry. Sustainability, 13(4), 1861. doi: 10.3390/su13041861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041861
    View in Google Scholar
  35. de Bakker, F. G. A., Rasche, A., & Ponte, S. (2019). Multi-stakeholder initiatives on sustainability: a cross-disciplinary review and research agenda for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 29(3), 343?383. doi: 10.1017/beq.2019.10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2019.10
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Demiray, M. R. (2015). Natural law theory, legal positivism, and the normativity of law. European Legacy, 20(8), 807?826. doi: 10.1080/10848770.2015.1078 991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2015.1078991
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage Publication.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Desai, R., & Roberts, R. (2013). De?ciencies in the code of conduct: the AICPA rhetoric surrounding the tax return preparation outstanding disclosure rules. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 457?471. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1329-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1329-z
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Dima, A. M., Begu, L., Vasilescu, M. D., & Maassen, M. A. (2018). The relationship between the knowledge economy and global competitiveness in the European Union. Sustainability, 10, 1706. doi: 10.3390/su10061706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061706
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Erwin, P. M. (2011). Corporate codes of conduct: the effects of code content and quality on ethical performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 535?548. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0667-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0667-y
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Fatemi, D., Hasseldine, J., & Hite, P. (2018). The influence of ethical codes of conduct on professionalism in tax practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 2. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-4081-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4081-1
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Ferraro, F., & Beunza, D. (2018). Creating common ground: a communicative action model of dialogue in shareholder engagement. Organization Science, 29, 1187?1207. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2018.1226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1226
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Finestone, K., & Kingston, E. (2021). Crisis prices: the ethics of market controls during a global pandemic. Business Ethics Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1017/beq.2021.15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2021.15
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Finnis, J. M. (1998). Natural law and the ethics of discourse. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 43, 53?73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/43.1.53
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Firtescu, B. N., Terinte, P.-A., Roman, A., Anton, S. G. (2019). Corporate governance and bank profitability. An empirical assessment for emerging Europe. Transformations in Business & Economics, 18, 2A (47A), 531?552.
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Fura, B., Wojnar, J., & Kasprzyk, B. (2017). Ranking and classification of EU countries regarding their levels of implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 968?979. doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017. 07.088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.088
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Girard, C., & Sobczak, A. (2012). Towards a model of corporate and social stakeholder engagement: analyzing the relations between a french mutual bank and its members. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 215?225. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-1034-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1034-3
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Goel, M., & Ramanathan, P. E. (2014). Business ethics and corporate social responsibility ? is there a dividing line? Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 49?59. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00175-0.
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Golec, M. (2018). Cooperative banks? social responsibility: the lending activities of a group of cooperative banks in Poland. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 6(3), 41?52. doi: 10.23762/FSO_VOL6_NO3_3.
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Griffiths, J. (2018). Financing the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Development, 61, 62?67. doi: 10.1057/s41301-018-0178-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-018-0178-1
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: descriptive, instrumental, and normative aspects. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 235?248. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3587-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3587-2
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Honneth, A. (2014). The normativity of ethical life. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 40(8), 817?826. doi: 10.1177/0191453714541538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453714541538
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Hoover, K., & Pepper, M. (2015). How did they say that? Ethics statements and normative frameworks at best companies to work for. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 605?617. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2255-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2255-z
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Idowu, S. O., Schmidpeter, R., & Liangrong, Z. (2020). The future of the UN sustainable development goals: business perspectives for global development in 2030. New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21154-7
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Igwe, P., Icha-Ituma, A., & Madichie, N. (2018). The evaluation of CSR and social value practices among UK commercial and social enterprises. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 6(1), 37?52. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2018.060 102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2018.060102
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Ikonen, P., Luomaaho, V., & Bowen, A. S. (2017). Transparency for sponsored content: analysing codes of ethics in public relations, marketing, advertising and journalism. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 11(2), 165?178. doi: 10.1080/1553118X.2016.1252917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2016.1252917
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Jaki, A., & Siuta-Tokarska, B. (2019). New imperative of corporate value creation in face of the challenges of sustainable development. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(2). doi: 10.15678/EBER.2019.070204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070204
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Kant, I. (2011). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals: a German-English edition, ed. and tr. Mary Gregor and Jens Timmermann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973741
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Kaptein, M. (2011). Toward effective codes: testing the relationship with unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 233?251. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0652-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0652-5
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Kingston, E. (2021). Shopping with a conscience? The epistemic case for relinquishment over conscientious consumption. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31, 242?74. doi: 10.1017/beq.2020.13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2020.13
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Kelley, S., & Nahser, R. (2014). Developing sustainable strategies: foundations, method, and pedagogy. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(4), 631?644. doi: 10.1 007/s10551-013-2014-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2014-6
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Kolk, A., & van Tulder, R. (2005). Setting new global rules? TNCs and codes of conduct. Transnational Corporations, 14(3), 1?27.
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Kolk, A., & Van Tulder, R. (2010). International business, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. International Business Review, 19, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.12.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.12.003
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Kourula, A., Pisani, N., & Kolk, A. (2017). Corporate sustainability and inclusive development: highlights from international business and management research. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 24, 14?18. doi: 10.1016/j.cos ust.2017.01.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.003
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Kovacova, M., & Lăzăroiu, G. (2021). Sustainable organizational performance, cyber-physical production networks, and deep learning-assisted smart process planning in Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 16(3), 41?54. doi: 10.22381/emfm16320 212.
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Kovoor-Misra, S. (2009). Understanding perceived organizational identity during crisis and change: a threat/opportunity framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22, 494?510. doi: 10.1108/09534810910983460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810910983460
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Krejčí, P., & Šebestová, J. (2018). Social innovation ties: a dilemma of product and employee orientation. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17, 123?133. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2018.17.2.11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2018.17.2.11
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. London, U.K.: Sage.
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis ? a guide to methods, practice and using software. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781446 288719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288719
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Linnhoff, S., Russell, H., Smith, K. T., & Smith, M. (2014). A descriptive analysis of ethics codes, CSR, and efforts to combat human trafficking. International Journal of Corporate Governance, 5(3/4), 156?177. doi: 10.1504/IJCG.2014.0 6 4725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCG.2014.064725
    View in Google Scholar
  71. MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2017). Constantine?s Christianity for the (dis)integrated EU?déj? vu of Constantine?s Roman governance reflecting of the mistrial of Jesus for EU? Dialogo, 4, 81?98. doi: 10.18638/dialogo.201 7.4.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18638/dialogo.2017.4.1.8
    View in Google Scholar
  72. MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2019). Corporate social responsibility information in annual Reports in the EU ? Czech case study. Sustainability, 11, 237. doi: 10.3 390/su11010237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010237
    View in Google Scholar
  73. MacGregor Pelikánová, R., & Hála, M. (2021). CSR unconscious consumption by Generation Z in the COVID-19 era ? responsible heretics not paying CSR bonus? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(8), 390. doi: 10.3390/ jrfm14080390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14080390
    View in Google Scholar
  74. MacGregor Pelikánová, R., & MacGregor, R. K. (2020). The EU puzzling CSR regime and the confused perception by ambassadors of luxury fashion businesses: a case study from Pařížská. Central European Business Review, 9(3), 74?108. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.240
    View in Google Scholar
  75. MacGregor Pelikánová, R., & MacGregor, R. K. (2021). The Covid-19 as interpretation instrument for the content of corporate social responsibility and its reporting in the EU. Lawyer Quarterly, 2, 305?322.
    View in Google Scholar
  76. MacGregor Pelikánová, R., Němečková, T., & MacGregor, R. K. (2021). CSR statements in international and Czech luxury fashion industry at the onset and during the COVID-19 pandemic ? slowing down the fast fashion business? Sustainability, 13(7), 3715. doi: 10.3390/su13073715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073715
    View in Google Scholar
  77. MacGregor, R. K., Sroka, W., & MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2020). The CSR perception of front-line employees of luxury fashion businesses. Organizacija, 53(3), 198?211. doi: 10.2478/orga-2020-0013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2020-0013
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95?105. doi: 10.1023/A:1023331212247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023331212247
    View in Google Scholar
  79. May, A. Y. C., Hao, G. S., & Carter, S. (2021). Intertwining corporate social responsibility, employee green behavior and environmental sustainability: the mediation effect of organizational trust and organizational identity. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 16(2), 32?61. doi: 10.22381/emfm16220 212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22381/emfm16220212
    View in Google Scholar
  80. McCorquodale, R. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and international human rights law. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 385?400. doi: 10.1007/sl0551-009-0296-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0296-5
    View in Google Scholar
  81. McDonald, G. (2009). An anthology of codes of ethics. European Business Review, 21, 344?372. doi: 10.1108/09555340910970445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340910970445
    View in Google Scholar
  82. Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
    View in Google Scholar
  83. Messikomer, C. M, & Circa, C. C. (2010). Constructing a code of ethics: an experiential case of a national professional organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 55?71. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0347-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0347-y
    View in Google Scholar
  84. Metzker, Z., & Streimikis, J. (2020). CSR activities in the Czech SME segment. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 8(1), 49?64. doi: 10.373 35/ijek.v8i2.101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37335/ijek.v8i2.101
    View in Google Scholar
  85. Mridula, G., & Ramanathan, E. P. (2014). Business ethics and corporate social responsibility ? is there a dividing line? Procedia Economics and Finance, 11(1), 49?59. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00175-0C. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00175-0
    View in Google Scholar
  86. Nesadurai, H. E. S. (2013). Food security, the palm oil-land conflict nexus, and sustainability: a governance role for a private multi-stakeholder regime like the RSPO? Pacific Review, 26, 505?529. doi: 10.1080/09512748.2013.842311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2013.842311
    View in Google Scholar
  87. Nicolaides, A. (2016). Moral intensity and service delivery in the hospitality industry: the value of codes of ethics. Journal of Economics, 7(2-3,) 73?84. doi: 10.1 080/09765239.2016.11907823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09765239.2016.11907823
    View in Google Scholar
  88. Nonet, G., Kassel, K., & Meijs, L. (2016). Understanding responsible management: emerging themes and variations from European business school programs. Journal of Business Ethics, 139, 717?736. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-31 49-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3149-z
    View in Google Scholar
  89. Oladinrin, O. T., & Ho, C. M. F. (2016). Critical enablers for codes of ethics implementation in construction organizations. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(1), 1?10. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000385
    View in Google Scholar
  90. Olšanová, K., Gook, G., & Zlatić, M. (2018). Influence of luxury Companies? corporate social responsibility activities on consumer purchase intention: development of theoretical framework. Central European Business Review, 7(3), 1?25. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.200
    View in Google Scholar
  91. Pabian, A. M. (2019). University social responsibility in the opinion of students. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 7(4), 101?117. doi: 10.23762/FSOVOL7NO47.
    View in Google Scholar
  92. Pantazopoulos, S. E. (2014). Towards a coherent framework of transnational corporations? responsibility in international environmental law. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 24(1), 131?165. doi: 10.1093/yiel/yvu059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/yiel/yvu059
    View in Google Scholar
  93. Pasricha, P., Singh, B., & Verma, P. (2018). Ethical leadership, organic organizational cultures and corporate social responsibility: an empirical study in social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 941?958. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3568-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3568-5
    View in Google Scholar
  94. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: Sage.
    View in Google Scholar
  95. Payne, D., & Rayborn, C. (2001). Sustainable development: the ethics, support the economics. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2), 157?168. doi: 10.1023/A:10107 26830191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010726830191
    View in Google Scholar
  96. Perez-Batres, L. A., Doh, J. P., Miller, V. V., & Pisani, M. J. (2012). Stakeholder pressures as determinants of CSR strategic choice: why do firms choose symbolic versus substantive self-regulatory codes of conduct? Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 157?172. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1419-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1419-y
    View in Google Scholar
  97. Pettit, P. (2019). Social norms and the internal point of view: an elaboration of Hart?s genealogy of law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 39(2), 229?258. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqy039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqy039
    View in Google Scholar
  98. Pfordten, D. (2012). Five elements of normative ethics - a general theory of normative individualism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15, 10. doi: 10.1007 /s10677-011-9299-2.
    View in Google Scholar
  99. Phillips, R., Schrempf-Stirling, J., & Stutz, C. (2020). The past, history, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 166, 203?213. doi: 10.10 07/s10551-019-04319-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04319-0
    View in Google Scholar
  100. Pino, G. (2014). Positivism, legal validity, and the separation of law and morals. Ratio Juris, 27, 190?217. doi: 10.1111/raju.12044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12044
    View in Google Scholar
  101. Pisani, N., Kourula, A., Kolk, A., & Meijer, R. (2017). How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 591?614. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2017.05.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.05.003
    View in Google Scholar
  102. Plank, A., & Teichmann, K. (2018). A facts panel on corporate social and environmental behavior: decreasing information asymmetries between producers and consumers through product labeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 868?877. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.195
    View in Google Scholar
  103. Polcyn, J., Stępień, S., & Czyżewski, B. (2019). The measurement of the quality of the environment and its determinants in Poland and in the regional perspective. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 21(2), 11?21. doi: 10.293 02/oeconomica.2019.21.2.1.
    View in Google Scholar
  104. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2019). Creating shared value. In Managing sustainable business. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1144-7_16
    View in Google Scholar
  105. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605
    View in Google Scholar
  106. Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practise: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications.
    View in Google Scholar
  107. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance: the role of good corporate governance. Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 137?151. doi: 10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.001
    View in Google Scholar
  108. Sama, L. (2006). Interactive effects of external environmental conditions and internal firm characteristics on MNEs? choice of strategy in the development of a code of conduct. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(2), 137?165. doi: 10.2307/38 57819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200616218
    View in Google Scholar
  109. Sanford, C. (2011). The responsible business. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    View in Google Scholar
  110. Schaltegger, S., Beckmann, M., & Hockerts, K. (2018). Collaborative entrepreneurship for sustainability: creating solutions in light of the UN sustainable development goals. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 131?152. doi: 10.1504/IJEV.2018.092709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.092709
    View in Google Scholar
  111. Schauster, E. E., Walker, T., & Duffy, M. (2018). Exemplary codes of ethics: a rhetorical criticism of WPP. Advertising & Society Quarterly, 19, 2. doi: 10.1 353/ASR.2018.0016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/asr.2018.0016
    View in Google Scholar
  112. Schormair, M. J. L., & Gilbert, D. U. (2021). Creating value by sharing values: managing stakeholder value conflict in the face of pluralism through discursive justification. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(1), 1?36. doi: 10.1017/beq.2020.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2020.12
    View in Google Scholar
  113. Schüz, M. (2012). Sustainable corporate responsibility ? the foundation of successful business in the new millennium. Central European Business Review, 1(2), 7?15. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.12
    View in Google Scholar
  114. Searcy, C. (2014). Measuring enterprise sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25, 120?133. doi: 10.1002/bse.1861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1861
    View in Google Scholar
  115. Sekerka, L. E., Comer, D. R., & Godwin, L. N. (2014). Positive organizational ethics: cultivating and sustaining moral performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 435?444. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1911-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1911-z
    View in Google Scholar
  116. Sheehy, B. (2015). Defining CSR: problems and solutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 625?648. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2281-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2281-x
    View in Google Scholar
  117. Slager, R., Gond, J. P., & Crilly, D. (2021). Reactivity to sustainability metrics: a configurational study of motivation and capacity. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(2), 275?307. doi: 10.1017/beq.2020.20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2020.20
    View in Google Scholar
  118. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research ? a practical handbook. London: Sage.
    View in Google Scholar
  119. Singh, J., Iglesias, O., & Batista-Foguet, J. (2012). Does having an ethical brand matter? The influence of consumer perceived ethicality on trust, affect and loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 541?549. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-12 16-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1216-7
    View in Google Scholar
  120. Soltani, B., & Maupetit, C. (2015). Importance of core values of ethics, integrity and accountability in the European corporate governance codes. Journal of Management and Governance, 19, 259?284. doi: 10.1007/s10997-013-9259-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-013-9259-4
    View in Google Scholar
  121. Somers, M. J. (2001). Ethical codes of conduct and organizational context: a study of the relationship between codes of conduct, employee behavior and organizational values. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 185?195. doi: 10.1023/A:10064 57810654.
    View in Google Scholar
  122. Sparkes, R., & Cowton, J. Ch. (2004). The maturing of socially responsible investment: a review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 45?57. doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033106.4326 0.99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033106.43260.99
    View in Google Scholar
  123. Sroka, W., & Hittmár, S. (2016). Business ethics in Central European countries: the case of Poland and Slovakia. In W. Sroka, J., Hittmár, J. Kurowska-Pysz (Eds.). New trends in management and production engineering?regional, cross-border and global perspectives. Achen: Shaker Verlag, 254?263.
    View in Google Scholar
  124. Sroka, W., & Lőrinczy, M. (2015). The perception of ethics in business: analysis of research results. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34, 156?163. doi: 10.1016/ S2212-5671(15)01614-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01614-7
    View in Google Scholar
  125. Sroka, W., & Szántó, R. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and business ethics in controversial sectors: analysis of research results. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation (JEMI), 14, 111?126. doi: 10.7 341/20181435 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.7341/20181435
    View in Google Scholar
  126. Stahl, B. C. (2012). Morality, ethics, and reflection: a categorization of normative IS research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(8), 1. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00304
    View in Google Scholar
  127. Statler, M., & Oliver, D. (2016). The moral of the story: re-framing ethical codes of conduct as narrative processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 136, 89?100. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2505-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2505-0
    View in Google Scholar
  128. Strouhal, J., Gurvitš, N., Nikitina-Kalamäe, M., & Startseva, E. (2015). Finding the link between CSR reporting and corporate financial performance: evidence on Czech and Estonian listed companies Central European Business Review, 4, 48?59. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.132
    View in Google Scholar
  129. Taylor, Ch. (2018). The ethics of authenticity. Harvard: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvv41887
    View in Google Scholar
  130. Ting, I. W. K., Azizan N. A., Bhaskaran, R. K., & Sukumaran, S. K. (2020). Corporate social performance and firm performance: comparative study among developed and emerging market firms. Sustainability, 12(1), 26. doi: 10.3390/ su12010026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010026
    View in Google Scholar
  131. Van Schoelandt, C. (2018) Moral accountability and social norms. Social Philosophy and Policy, 35(1), 217?236. doi: 10.3390/su12010026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052518000067
    View in Google Scholar
  132. Van Tulder, R. (2017). Rescuing the collaborative paradigm from its supporters? Annual Review of Social Partnerships, 12, 27?31. doi: 10.1.1.885.3859.
    View in Google Scholar
  133. Van Tulder, R., & Kolk, A. (2001). Multinationality and corporate ethics: codes of conduct in the sporting goods industry. Journal of International Business Study, 32, 267?283. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490952
    View in Google Scholar
  134. Van Tulder, R., & Keen, N. (2018). Capturing collaborative challenges: designing complexity-sensitive theories of change for cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 315?332. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3857-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3857-7
    View in Google Scholar
  135. Van Tulder, R., May Seitanidi, M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). Enhancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships. Four impact loops for channeling partnership studies. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 1?17. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2756-4 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2756-4
    View in Google Scholar
  136. Van Zanten, J. A., & van Tulder, R. (2018). Multinational enterprises and the sustainable development goals: an institutional approach to corporate engagement. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3-4), 208?233. doi: 10.1057/s422 14-018-0008-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0008-x
    View in Google Scholar
  137. Vivant, M. (2016). Building a common culture IP? International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 47, 259?261. doi: 10.1007/s40319-016-0472-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-016-0472-y
    View in Google Scholar
  138. Vogel, D. (2010). The private regulation of global corporate conduct, achievements and limitations. Business & Society, 49, 68?87. doi: 10.1177/0007650309343 407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309343407
    View in Google Scholar
  139. Von Wright, G. H., & Aarnio, A. (1990). On law and morality. A dialogue. Ratio Juris, 3, 321?330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1990.tb00065.x
    View in Google Scholar
  140. Vourvachis, P., & Woodward, T. (2015). Content analysis in social and environmental reporting research: trends and challenges. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 16(2), 166?195. doi: 0.1108/JAAR-04-2013-0027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2013-0027
    View in Google Scholar
  141. Washburn, N. T., Waldman, D. A., Sully de Luque, M. F., & Carter, M. Z. (2018). Executives? stakeholder values in the prediction of work process change. Journal of Management Studies, 55, 1423?1451. doi: 10.1111/joms.12394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12394
    View in Google Scholar
  142. Weber, J., & Wasieleski, D. (2013). Corporate ethics and compliance programs: a report, analysis and critique. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(4), 609?626. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1561-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1561-6
    View in Google Scholar
  143. Whitehouse, G. (2010). Newsgathering and privacy: expanding ethics codes to reflect change in the digital media age. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 25, 310?327. doi: 10.1080/08900523.2010.512827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2010.512827
    View in Google Scholar
  144. Zikic, S. A. (2018). Modern concept of sustainable development. Progress in Economics Sciences, 5. doi: 10.14595/PES/05/009.
    View in Google Scholar
  145. Zolingen, Z. J., & Honders, H. (2010). Metaphors and the application of a corporate code of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(3), 385?400. doi: 10.1007/ s10551-009-0163-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0163-4
    View in Google Scholar
  146. Zysk, W. (2020). Fair trade phenomenon and its evolution in Visegrad countries. International Entrepreneurship Review, 6(4), 81?98. doi: 10.15678/IER.2020.0 604.06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2020.0604.06
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 24

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.