In search of key determinants of innovativeness in the regions of the Visegrad group countries
Abstract
Research background: Discussions on the state of the economy in times of crisis focus not only on maintaining or improving innovativeness, but also on the emergence of new dimensions of this phenomenon and changing the significance of individual determinants of innovativeness. Innovativeness is a complex, multidimensional and difficult to measure phenomenon, which implies the need to select various indicators and methods for its assessment. Synthetic measures of innovativeness are widely used in comparative analyses, in particular presenting results in international or interregional cross-sections. The degree of innovativeness should also be assessed at different levels of economic aggregation. The lower the level of aggregation, the easier it becomes to capture the specific determinants of the increase in innovativeness of a given area.
Purpose of the article: The main aim of the paper is to attempt to measure the relationship between expenditures and results of innovative activities for NUTS-2 regions of the Visegrad Group countries. Three variables were adopted to describe the effects of innovative activity: PCT patent applications per billion GDP (in PPS), trademark applications per billion GDP (in PPS) and public-private co-publications per million of population.
Methods: The study covered 37 NUTS-2 regions of the Visegrad Group countries in the years 2014?2021. From the point of view of the purpose of the paper and the need to search for the relationship between expenditures on innovative activity and the results of this activity, it is worth emphasizing that the use of static and dynamic econometric models proved to be a substantively correct solution leading to the formulation of clear conclusions.
Findings & value added: The conducted research confirmed that business R&D expenditure on GDP has a positive effect on inventions expressed by patents and trademarks, especially in the long run. In addition, the literature review and empirical analyses indicate that the main determinants of innovativeness (both before and during the pandemic) are the expenditures of economic entities on R&D, competences expressed by the level of education or participation in tertiary education, as well as the number of ICT specialists and the percentage of people employed in science and technology. Despite the deterioration of many macroeconomic indicators in the countries of the Visegrad Group, the expenditures of the business sector on R&D in most regions did not decrease between 2019 and 2021. The added value of the paper is the presented research procedure, which can be used in analyses of innovativeness also for other groups of regions.
Keywords
determinants of innovativeness, R&D expenditure, patent applications, trademark applications, NUTS-2 regions of the Visegrad Group countries
References
- Akça, S., & Afşar B. (2020). The relationship between economic growth and in-novation: panel data analysis on chosen OECD countries. In H. Dinçer & S. Yüksel (Eds). Handbook of research on decision-making techniques in finan-cial marketing (pp. 358?382). Hershey PA, USA: IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2559-3.ch017
View in Google Scholar - Alpaslan, B., & Ali, A. (2017). The spillover effects of innovative ideas on human capital. Review of Development Economics, 22(1), 333?360. doi: 10.1111/rode. 12344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12344
View in Google Scholar - Anderson, T. W., & Hsiao, C. (1982). Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 18, 47?82. doi: 10.1016/030 4-4076(82)90095-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(82)90095-1
View in Google Scholar - Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Mon-te Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277?297. doi: 10.2307/2297968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
View in Google Scholar - Athreye, S., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2021). The evolving role of public R&D and public research organizations in innovation. In A. Arundel, S. Athreye & S. Wunsch-Vincent (Eds.). Harnessing public research for innovation in the 21st century: an international assessment of knowledge transfer policies (pp. 3?24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108904230.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108904230.005
View in Google Scholar - Aytekin, A, Ecer, F., Korucuk, S., & Karamaşa, C. (2022). Global innovation efficiency assessment of EU member and candidate countries via DEA-EATWIOS multi-criteria methodology. Technology in Society, 68(1), 101896. doi: 10.101 6/j.techsoc.2022.101896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101896
View in Google Scholar - Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric analysis of panel data. Springer Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5
View in Google Scholar - Banaszyk, P., Deszczyński, P., Gorynia, M., & Malaga, K. (2021). The Covid-19 pandemic as a potential change agent for selected economic concepts. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(4), 35?50. doi: 10.15678/ EBER.2021.090403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090403
View in Google Scholar - Bello, M., Caperna, G., Damioli, G., & Mathevet, I. (2022). The innovation output indicator. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2760/802325.
View in Google Scholar - Bhattacharya, A. (2016). Reinterpreting innovation and innovation measurement ? a theoretical framework for innovation in organisations. Journal of Organisation & Human Behaviour, 5(4), 47?55.
View in Google Scholar - Bigos, K., & Michalik, A. (2020). The influence of innovation on international new ventures? exporting in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia coun-tries. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(3), 47?63. doi: 10.15678 /EBER.2020.080303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080303
View in Google Scholar - Block, J., Fisch, C., Ikeuchi, K., & Kato, M. (2022). Trademarks as an indicator of regional innovation: evidence from Japanese prefectures. Regional Studies, 56(2), 190?209. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1887843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1887843
View in Google Scholar - Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115?143. doi: 10.101 6/S0304-4076(98)00009-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
View in Google Scholar - Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61?74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
View in Google Scholar - Burhan, M., Singh, A. K., & Jain, S. K. (2017). Patents as proxy for measuring innovations: a case of changing patent filing behavior in Indian public funded research organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123(C), 181?190. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.002
View in Google Scholar - Castellacci, F. (2008). Innovation and the competitiveness of industries: compar-ing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches. Technological Forecast-ing & Social Change, 75, 984?1006. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.09.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2007.09.002
View in Google Scholar - Chamberlain, G. (1978). Omitted variable bias in panel data: estimating the re-turns to schooling. Annales de l'inséé, 30/31, 49?82. doi:10.2307/20075285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20075285
View in Google Scholar - Chen, J., Viardot, E., & Brem, A. (2020). Innovation and innovation management. In J. Chen, A. Brem, E. Viardot, P. K. Wang (Eds.). The Routledge companion to innovation management (pp. 3?16). London and New York: Routledge Tay-lor & Francis Group. doi: 10.4324/9781315276670-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315276670-1
View in Google Scholar - Cichy, J., & Gradon, W. (2016). Innovative economy, and the activity of financial market institutions: case of Poland. Journal of International Studies, 9(1), 156?166. doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-1/11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-1/11
View in Google Scholar - Ciołek, D., & Golejewska, A. (2022). Efficiency determinants of regional innova-tion systems in Polish subregions. Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, 311(3), 24?45. doi: 10.33119/GN/151792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/151792
View in Google Scholar - Czupich, M. (2018). The innovative potential of the Visegrad group regions. University Economic Bulletin, 38, 14?22. doi: 10.31470/2306-546X-2018-38-14-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2306-546X-2018-38-14-22
View in Google Scholar - de Carvalho, G. D. G., Cruz, J. A. W., de Carvalho, H. G., Duclós, L. C., & de Fátima Stankowitz. R. (2017). Innovativeness measures: a bibliometric review and a classification proposal. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(1), 81?101. doi: 10.1108/IJIS-10-2016-0038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2016-0038
View in Google Scholar - Denkowska, S., Fijorek, K., & Wegrzyn, G. (2020). Formal and non-formal edu-cation and training as an instrument fostering innovation and competitiveness in EU member countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 3, 82?98. doi: 10.7441/joc. 2020.03.05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.03.05
View in Google Scholar - Doyle, E., & Perez-Alanis, M. (2017). From the concept to the measurement of sustainable competitiveness: social and environmental aspects. Entrepreneur-ial Business and Economics Review, 5(4), 35?59. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2017. 050402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050402
View in Google Scholar - Duľová Spišáková, E., Gontkovičová, B., Majerníková, J., Spišák, E., & Pacana, A. (2019). Management of research and development activities in the context of strategy Europe 2020. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 112?123. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.09
View in Google Scholar - Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., León, L. R., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (Eds.) (2021). Global innovation index 2021. Tracking innovation through the COVID-19 crisis. WIPO: Geneva, Switzerland.
View in Google Scholar - Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (Eds.) (2014). Global innovation index 2014. The human factor in innovation. Cornell Universi-ty/INSEAD/WIPO: Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and Geneva.
View in Google Scholar - ErvitsI. (2020). Quadrants of invention: individual patent applications as unu-tilized resource of innovative capacity. International Entrepreneurship Re-view, 6(1), 7?27. doi: 10.15678/IER.2020.0601.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2020.0601.01
View in Google Scholar - European Commission, Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry (2014). Innovation union scoreboard 2014, Publications Office. Retrieved from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2769/88936 (10.06.2022).
View in Google Scholar - European Commission, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entre-preneurship and SMEs (2021). Regional innovation scoreboard 2021. Publica-tions Office. Retrieved from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2873/674111 (10.06.2022).
View in Google Scholar - European Commission (2019). European regional competitiveness index 2019. Publications Office 2019. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/e n/information/maps/regional_competitiveness/ (26.06.2022).
View in Google Scholar - Firlej, K. A. (2019). Expenditure on research and development activities as a determinant of the innovativeness of the European Union?s economy. Re-search Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics, 550, 35?46. doi: 10.15611/pn. 2019.7.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2019.7.03
View in Google Scholar - Freimane, R., & B?li?a, S. (2016). Research and development expenditures and economic growth in the EU: a panel data analysis. Economics & Business, 29(1), 5?11. doi: 10.1515/eb-2016-0016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eb-2016-0016
View in Google Scholar - Gault, F. (2018). Defining and measuring innovation in all sectors of the econo-my. Research Policy, 47(3), 617?622. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.007
View in Google Scholar - Golejewska, A. (2013). Competitiveness, innovation and regional development. The case of the Visegrad group countries. Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, 265(7-8), 87?112. doi:10.33119/GN/100953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/100953
View in Google Scholar - Guellec, D., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2000). The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2000/04. doi: 10.1787/670385851815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/670385851815
View in Google Scholar - Hameed, K., Arshed, N., Yazdani, N., & Munir, M. (2021). Motivating business towards innovation: a panel data study using dynamic capability framework. Technology in Society, 65(C), 101581. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101581
View in Google Scholar - Hollanders, H., & Es-Sadki, N. (2021). European innovation scoreboard 2021. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, European Union.
View in Google Scholar - Huňady, J., & Pisár, P. (2021). Innovation and invention in the EU business sec-tor: the role of the research and development expenditures. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 19(2), 168?188. doi: 10.7906/indecs.19.2.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.19.2.1
View in Google Scholar - Hunady, J., Pisar, P., Musa, H., & Musova, Z. (2017). Innovation support and economic development at the regional level: panel data evidence from Vise-grad countries. Journal of International Studies, 10(3), 147?160. doi: 10.14254/2071 -8330.2017/10-3/11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-3/11
View in Google Scholar - IMD (2020). World competitiveness yearbook. Lausanne: IMD Competitiveness Center.
View in Google Scholar - Ivanová, E., & Masárová, J. (2018a). Evaluation of innovation performance of Visegrad countries regions putting a stress on human capital. Social & Economic Revue, 16(2), 27?34.
View in Google Scholar - Ivanová, E., & Masárová, J. (2018b). Performance evaluation of the Visegrad Group countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 270?289. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1429944
View in Google Scholar - Ivanová, E., & Masárová, J. (2019). Differences in innovation performance of Visegrad Group regions. In V. Bevanda (Ed.) EMAN 2019 ? economics & management: how to cope with distrupted times. Conference Proceedings (pp. 635?640). Belgrade: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. doi: 10.31410/EMAN.2019.635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2019.635
View in Google Scholar - Ivus, O., Jose, M., & Sharma, R. (2021). R&D tax credit and innovation: evidence from private firms in India. Research Policy, 50(1), 104128. doi: 10.1016/j.r espol.2020.104128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104128
View in Google Scholar - Janoskova, K., & Kral, P. (2019). An in-depth analysis of the summary innovation index in the V4 countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 11(2), 68?83. doi: 10.7441/joc.2019.02.05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2019.02.05
View in Google Scholar - Jewell, C. (2021). Global innovation index 2021 ? tracking innovation through the COVID-19 crisis 2021. WIPO Magazine, 2021, 3.
View in Google Scholar - Kalapouti, K., Petridis, K., Malesios, C., & Dey, P. K. (2020). Measuring effi-ciency of innovation using combined Data Envelopment Analysis and Struc-tural Equation Modeling: empirical study in EU regions. Annals of Operations Research, 294(1/2), 297?320. doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2728-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2728-4
View in Google Scholar - Khedhaouria, A., & Thurik, R. (2017). Configurational conditions of national innovation capability: a fuzzy set analysis approach. Technological Forecast-ing and Social Change, 120, 48?58. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.005
View in Google Scholar - Kirillova, E., & Uvarova, N. (2021). Multilayered balanced indicators system for evaluating the results of innovation activities within the framework of cooper-ation. In N. Akatov & K. Antipyev (Eds.). SHS web of conferences, 10th annu-al international conference ?Schumpeterian readings?. ICSR. doi: 10.1051/shsc onf/202111600061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111600061
View in Google Scholar - Lei, L., Yuchen, Y., & Yuanchang, W. (2020). The impact of R&D input on tech-nological innovation: evidence from South Asian and Southeast Asian coun-tries. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2020, 6408654. doi: 10.1155 /2020/6408654.
View in Google Scholar - Lopez-Cabarcos, M. A., Pineiro-Chousa, J., & Quinoa-Pineiro, L. (2021). An approach to a country?s innovation considering cultural, economic, and social conditions. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 2747?2766, doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2020.1838314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1838314
View in Google Scholar - Mamede, R. P. (2017). Structural asymmetries, innovation measurement and innovation policies in the EU. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 16, 377?392. doi: 10.1386/pjss.16.3.377_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss.16.3.377_1
View in Google Scholar - Mikhaylova, A. A., Mikhaylov, A. S, Oksana V. Savchina, O. V., & Plotnikova, A. P. (2019). Innovation landscape of the Baltic region. Administratie si Management Public, 33, 165?180. doi: 10.24818/amp/2019.33-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2019.33-10.
View in Google Scholar - Misala, J. (2014). Theoretical grounds of the development of long-term competi-tive advantages in international trade. In M. A. Weresa (Ed.). Innovation, hu-man capital and trade competitiveness. How are they connected and why do they matter? (pp. 3?52). Cham?Heidelberg?New York?London: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02072-3_1
View in Google Scholar - Orozco, L. A., Sanabria, J. A., Sosa, J. C., Aristizabal, J., & López, L. (2022). How do IT investments interact with other resources to improve innovation? Journal of Business Research, 144, 358?365. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.078
View in Google Scholar - Parrilli, M. D., Balavac, M., & Radicic, D. (2020). Business innovation modes and their impact on innovation outputs: regional variations and the nature of innovation across EU regions. Research Policy, 49(8), 104047. doi: 10.1016/j.resp ol.2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104047
View in Google Scholar - Pleśniarska, A. (2018). Research and development ? a strong or weak position of the EU in comparison with global competitors. Central and Eastern European Journal of Management and Economics, 6(2), 81?93. doi: 10.29015/ceejm e.722.
View in Google Scholar - Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86, 79?93.
View in Google Scholar - Preda, A. M., Crişan, D. A., Stănică, J. L., & Samuel, A. N. A. (2019). Innovation and ICT development: an analysis for the EU-28 Member States. Journal of Information Systems & Operations Management, 13(2), 154?163.
View in Google Scholar - Pylak, K., & Wojnicka-Sycz, E. (2017). Transforming innovation models in Eu-ropean regions: breaking out of path dependency and growing faster? Miscellanea Geographica: Regional Studies on Development, 21(2), 51?59. doi: 10.1515/mgrsd-2017-0006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mgrsd-2017-0006
View in Google Scholar - Raymond, W., Mairesse, J., Mohnen, P., & Palm, F. (2015). Dynamic models of R&D, innovation and productivity: panel data evidence for Dutch and French manufacturing. European Economic Review, 78, 285?306. doi: 10.1016/j.euroe corev.2015.06.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.002
View in Google Scholar - Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., & Białek, J. (2019). Measurement of the average innova-tiveness change over time in the EU member states. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(2), 268?293. doi: 10.3846/jbem.2019.8337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2019.8337
View in Google Scholar - Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., & Białek, J. (2016). A multivariate approach in measuring innovation performance (Multivarijantni pristup u mjerenju inovacija). Zbor-nik Radova Ekonomskog Fakultet au Rijeci, 34(2), 443?479. doi: 10.18045/zbefri .2016.2.443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2016.2.443
View in Google Scholar - Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., & Grzelak, M. M. (2020). Macroeconomic stability and the level of competitiveness in EU member states: a comparative dynamic ap-proach. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(4), 657?688. doi: 10.24136/oc.2020.027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.027
View in Google Scholar - Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., & Grzelak, M. M. (2021). Multidimensional analysis of regional investment attractiveness in Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(1), 103?138. doi: 10.24136/ eq.2021.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.004
View in Google Scholar - Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., Grzelak, M. M., & Laskowska, I. (2019). The im-pact of research and development activity on the TFP level in manufacturing in Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 14(4), 711?737. doi: 10.24136/eq.2019.033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2019.033
View in Google Scholar - Roukanas, S. (2021). Measuring innovation of countries. Economies of the Balkan and Eastern European countries. KnE Social Sciences, 2021, 157?189. doi: 10.18502/kss.v5i9.9892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i9.9892
View in Google Scholar - Schwab, K. (2019). The global competitiveness report 2019. World Economic Forum: Geneva, Switzerland.
View in Google Scholar - Sharma, A., Sousa, C., & Woodward, R. (2022). Determinants of innovation out-comes: the role of institutional quality. Technovation, 118, 102562. doi: 10.101 6/j.technovation.2022.10256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102562
View in Google Scholar - Silaghi, M., Alexa, D., Jude, C., Litan, C. (2014). Do business and public sector research and development expenditures contribute to economic growth in Cen-tral and Eastern European countries? A dynamic panel estimation. Economic Modelling, 36, 108?119. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.08.035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.08.035
View in Google Scholar - Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2022). Measuring innovation and innovativeness: a data-mining approach. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 56(4), 2415?2434. doi: 10.1007/s11135-021-01231-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01231-6
View in Google Scholar - Skalický, R., Meluzín, T., Zinecker, M., Balcerzak, A. P., & Rogalska, E. (2022). Brand valuation: an innovative approach based on conversion ratios. Econom-ic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/1 331677X.2022.2097110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2097110
View in Google Scholar - Sochuľáková, J., (2020). Research and development expenditure and their im-portance for innovation development 2020. University Review, 14(4), 18?23.
View in Google Scholar - Song, H., Zhao, Z., & Varma, A. (2022). The impact of sustainable input on re-gional innovation performance: moderating effects of policy support and cul-tural value. Sustainability, 14(19), 12706. doi: 10.3390/su141912706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912706
View in Google Scholar - Stasiulis, N. (2017). The idea of the creative society and the development of crea-tive industries. Economics and Sociology, 10(2), 217?226. doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-2/16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-2/16
View in Google Scholar - Strahl, D., & Sobczak, R. (2017). Conceptual roots for innovation and innovative-ness of the economy in Poland. GeoScape, 11(1), 41?51. doi: 10.1515/geosc-2017-0004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/geosc-2017-0004
View in Google Scholar - Szopik-Depczyńska, K., Cheba, K., Bąk, I., Kędzierska-Szczepaniak, A., Szczepa-niak, K., & Ioppolo, G. (2020). Innovation level and local development of EU regions. A new assessment approach. Land Use Policy, 99, 1?11. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104837
View in Google Scholar - Terzic, L. (2017). The role of innovation in fostering competitiveness and eco-nomic growth: evidence from developing economies. Comparative Economic Research ? Central and Eastern Europe, 20(4), 65?81. doi: 10.1515/cer-2017-0028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2017-0028
View in Google Scholar - Tsionas, M. (ed.) (2019). Panel data econometrics. Theory. Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/C2017-0-01562-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-01562-8
View in Google Scholar - UNDP (2021). The global knowledge index 2021.
View in Google Scholar - Weresa, M. A. (2015). Innovation and sustainable competitiveness: evidence from Poland. International Journal Transitions and Innovation Systems, 4(3/4), 150?163. doi: 10.1504/IJTIS.2015.077197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIS.2015.077197
View in Google Scholar - Węglarz, M. (2018). Innovation of the Polish economy in comparison with the EU member states. Economic and Environmental Studies, 18(2), 971?993. doi: 10.25167/ees.2018.46.31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25167/ees.2018.46.31
View in Google Scholar - Wang, Z., & Qi, Z. (2021). Analysis of the influences of ICTs on enterprise inno-vation performance in China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42, 474?478. doi: 10.1002/mde.3247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3247
View in Google Scholar - Zhengwen, W, Hongli, Y., Fei, F., Yingfeng, F., & Hong, Z. (2022). Science and technology insurance and regional innovation: evidence from provincial panel data in China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2022.2053518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2053518
View in Google Scholar - Zygmunt, A. (2022). The effect of research and development personnel on inno-vation activities of firms: Evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises from the Visegrad Group countries. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 10(3), 105?121. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2022.100307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2022.100307
View in Google Scholar - Žítek, V., Klímová, V., & Králová, M. (2016). Assessment of regional innovation systems as an assumption for innovation policy adjustment. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 49E, 169?186.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.