A new database on Green GDP; 1970-2019: a framework for assessing the green economy

Abstract

Research background: Numerous modern indicators are attempting to integrate better economic, political, social, and environmental ambitions to uncover potential synergy, trade-offs, and future views that center around the notion of a so-called green economy. As long as the various indicators are not bounded in one comprehensive measurement, utilizing knowledge of relevant information and statistics that are crucial for monitoring the progress will not give us answers on the progress towards green growth either. Without an adequate measurement framework and robust statistics, the evaluation of the green economy is open to subjective reasoning.

Purpose of the article: This paper aims to offer a strong standpoint for green topics by exploring the concept of Green GDP. The paper introduces a new, updated database on Green GDP for the set of 160 countries from 1970?2019.

Methods: This database is distinctive due to its balanced coverage of two components of the green economy: quantitative feature (standard methodological algorithm) and qualitative feature (opportunity costs) within a common Green GDP accounting framework.   

Findings & value added: Standardizing new methodologies and procedures for estimating environmental costs with a statistical foundation provides added value, which we hope will support the creation of reliable accounting and valuation systems for the green economy on a developing "green platform."

Keywords

green economy, green GDP, environment, database as time series, methodology, sustainability, sustainable growth, sustainable green development

References

1. Australian Energy Regulator (2015). National greenhouse accounts factors; Aus-tralian national greenhouse accounts. Australian energy regulator and depart-ment of environment of Australia, Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from https://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/80f603 e7-175b-4f97-8a9b-2d207f46594a/files/national-greenhouse-accounts-factors-july-2018.pdf. (11.11.2020)
   View in Google Scholar
2. Boyd, J. (2006). The nonmarket benefits of nature: what should be counted in green GDP? Ecological Economics, 61(4), 716?723. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.20 06.06.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.016
   View in Google Scholar
3. Brilhante, O., & Klaas, J. (2018). Green city concept and a method to measure green city performance over time applied to fifty cities globally: influence of GDP, population size and energy efficiency. Sustainability, 10(6), 2031. doi: 10.3390/su10062031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062031
   View in Google Scholar
4. Capoor, K., & Ambrosi, P. (2007). State and trends of the carbon market 2007. World Bank Institute, World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents. worldbank.org/curated/en/416871468138574709/State-and-trends-of-the-carbo n-market-2007 (8.11.2020).
   View in Google Scholar
5. Chakraborty, D., & Mukhopadhyay, K. (2014). Estimates of green GDP. Global Issues in Water Policy, 10, 165?187. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-8929-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8929-5_8
   View in Google Scholar
6. Environmental Indicator Report (2018). Environmental indicator report 2018. EEA Report No. 19/2018. European Environment Agency. doi: 10.2800/180334.
   View in Google Scholar
7. Eurostat (2020). Official EU statistical data. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu /eurostat (8.12.2020).
   View in Google Scholar
8. GGEI (2018). 2018 Global green economy index. Green policy platform. Re-trieved from https://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/research/2018-global-green-econ omy-index-ggei (9.12.2020).
   View in Google Scholar
9. GGGI (2019). Green growth index; concept, methods and applications. Global Green Growth Institute Technical Report, 5.
   View in Google Scholar
10. Hoff, J. V., Rasmussen, M. M. B., & S?rensen, P. B. (2021). Barriers and oppor-tunities in developing and implementing a green GDP. Ecological Economics, 181(2), 106905. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106905
    View in Google Scholar
11. Hussain, Z., Mehmood, B., Khan, M. K., & Tsimisaraka, R. S. M. (2022). Green growth, green technology, and environmental health: evidence from high-GDP Countries. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 816697. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.816 697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.816697
    View in Google Scholar
12. International Monetary Fund (2020). IMF Database. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Data (20.12.2020).
    View in Google Scholar
13. Islam, S., & Asad, M. (2021). Forecasting GDP and green GDP of South Asian country for sustainable development. Himalayan Economics and Business Management, 2(5), 51?57. doi: 10.47310/Hjebm.2021.v02i05.008.
    View in Google Scholar
14. Jacobs, M. (2013). Green growth. In R. Falkner (Ed.) The handbook of global climate and environment policy (pp. 197?214). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781118326213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118326213.ch12
    View in Google Scholar
15. Kalantaripor, M., & Alamdario, H.N. (2021). Spatial effects of energy consump-tion and green GDP in regional agreements. Sustainability, 13(18), 10078, doi: 10.3390/su131810078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810078
    View in Google Scholar
16. Kunanuntakij, K., Varabuntoonvit, V., Vorayos, N., Panjapornpon, C., & Mungcharoen, T. (2017). Thailand green GDP assessment based on environ-mentally extended input-output model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 970?977. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.106
    View in Google Scholar
17. Liu, D. (2021. Application and research of analytic hierarchy process in Green GDP development planning of smart city. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147(1), 646. doi: 10.106/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000646
    View in Google Scholar
18. Menegaki, A. (2021). Towards a global energy ? sustainable economy nexus; summing up evidence from recent empirical work. Energies, 14(16), 5074. doi: 10.3390/en14165074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14165074
    View in Google Scholar
19. Nahman, A., Mahumani, B. K., & de Lange, W. J. (2016). Beyond GDP: towards a green economy index. Development Southern Africa, 33(2), 215?233. doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2015.1120649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2015.1120649
    View in Google Scholar
20. National Statistics (2021). National statistics of all countries included in the anal-ysis.
    View in Google Scholar
21. Nowak, A., & Kasztelan, A. (2022). Economic competitiveness vs. green com-petitiveness of agriculture in the European Union countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(2), 379?405. doi: 10.24136/oc.2022.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.012
    View in Google Scholar
22. OECD (2012). Green growth and developing countries; Consultation draft. The organization for economic co-operation and development. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/green-development/greengrowthanddevelop ingcountries-consultationdraft.htm (15.12.2020).
    View in Google Scholar
23. OECD (2017). OECD green growth studies. Green growth indicators 2017. Re-trieved from https://www.oecd.org/environment/green-growth-indicators-2017-9789264268586-en.htm (15.12.2020).
    View in Google Scholar
24. OECD (2020). OECD database. Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/ (8.12.2020).
    View in Google Scholar
25. PAGE (2017). The green economy progress measurement framework. Partnership for action on green economy. United Countries environmental programme.
    View in Google Scholar
26. Qi, S., Huang, Z., & Ji, L. (2021). Sustainable development based on green GDP accounting and cloud computing: a case study of Zheijang province. Hindawi Scientific Programming, 2021, 7953164. doi: 10.1155/2021/7953164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7953164
    View in Google Scholar
27. Qi, S., Xu, L., & Coggins, J.S. (2001). Integrated environmental-economic ac-counting of GDP. Annual meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association in Chicago, August 5 - 8, 2001. Agricultural and Applied Eco-nomics Association. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.20582.
    View in Google Scholar
28. Rauch, J. N., & Chi, Y. F. (2010). The plight of green GDP in China. Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(1), 102?116. doi: 10.7916/consilie nce.v0i3.4498.
    View in Google Scholar
29. Sánchez García, J. L., & Díez Sanz, J. M. (2018). Climate change, ethics and sustainability: an innovative approach. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(2), 70?75. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.002
    View in Google Scholar
30. Sonthi, C., Harnphattananusorn, S., & Santipolvut, S. (2019). Concepts and em-pirical calculation of the green GDP for Thailand. International Journal of Green Economics, 13(1), 68?85. doi: 10.1504/IJGE.2019.101453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGE.2019.101453
    View in Google Scholar
31. Stjepanović, S., Tomić, D., & Škare, M. (2019). Green GDP: an analysis for de-veloping and developed countries. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 22(4), 4?17. doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2019-4-001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2019-4-001
    View in Google Scholar
32. Stjepanović, S., Tomić, D., & Škare, M. (2017). A new approach to measuring green GDP: a cross-country analysis. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(4), 574?590. doi: 10.9770/jesi.2017.4.4(13). DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.4(13)
    View in Google Scholar
33. Škare, M., Tomić, D., & Stjepanović, S. (2020). Energy consumption and green GDP in Europe: a panel cointegration analysis 2008?2016. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 25(1), 46?56. doi: 10.46544/AMS.v25i1.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v25i1.5
    View in Google Scholar
34. Talberth, J., & Bohara, A. K. (2006). Economic openness and green GDP. Ecological Economics, 58(4), 743?758. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.002
    View in Google Scholar
35. UN Database (2020). United Nation UNdata. Retrieved from https://data.un.org/ (20.12.2020).
    View in Google Scholar
36. UNEP (2012). Measuring progress towards an inclusive green economy. United Countries environmental programme.
    View in Google Scholar
37. Veklych, O., & Shlapak, M. (2013). Green GDP as an indicator of environmental cost of economic growth in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://archive.org/stream/ GreenGdpAsAnIndicatorOfEnvironmentalC-ostOfEconomicGrowthInUkraine/ Veklych.Shlapak.GreenGdpAsAnIndicatorOfEnvironmentalCostOfEconomicGrowthOfUkraine_djvu.txt (8.11.2021).
    View in Google Scholar
38. Vimochana, M. (2017). Green GDP calculations in developed and developing countries. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 4(6), 244?251.
    View in Google Scholar
39. Yu, Y., Yu, M., Lin, L., Chen, J., Li, D., Zhang, W., & Cao, K. (2019). National green GDP assessment and prediction for China based on a CA-Markov land use simulation model. Sustainability, 11(3), 576. doi: 10.3390/su11030576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030576
    View in Google Scholar
40. Wang, F., Wang, R., & Wang, J. (2020). Measurement of China?s green GDP and its dynamic variation based on industrial perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(35), 43813?43828. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-102 36-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10236-x
    View in Google Scholar
41. Wu, S., & Han, H. (2020). Sectoral changing patterns of China?s green GDP con-sidering climate change: an investigation based on the economic input-output life cycle assessment model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119764. doi: 10.1016/j.clepro.2019.119764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119764
    View in Google Scholar
42. Waste to Energy in Denmark (2006). The most efficient waste management sys-tem in Europe. Reno-Sam and Ramb?ll. Retrieved from https://stateofgreen.com /files/download/275 (8.11.2020).
    View in Google Scholar
43. World Development Indicators (2020). World Bank. Retrieved from http://data. worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators (10.12.2020).
    View in Google Scholar