Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services in protected areas: A study applied to Southeast Spain

Abstract

Research background: Protected areas (PAs) play a fundamental role in the maintenance of ecosystem processes and in the flow of ecosystem services (ESs) they provide. However, the management of PAs is complex due to the existence of different stakeholders with disparate and, often, opposed preferences and valuations. The sociocultural assessment of ESs contributes to optimizing the management of scarce resources based on the preferences of the different stakeholders, taking into account the economic, environmental and social dimensions of the analysed area.

Purpose of the article: In this work, a sociocultural assessment of the ESs provided by a PA in southeast Spain is carried out. The objective is to identify which the various ESs provided by this PA are and to establish their degree of importance for all the stakeholders involved.

Methods: For this, different complementary methodologies have been used in successive phases, both qualitative and quantitative. Specifically, a literature review, in-depth interviews and an assessment questionnaire were used.

Findings & value added: Based on the results obtained, a series of measures are proposed to improve the sustainable management of the PA and the socioeconomic development of its environment. The results of this study may be useful for PAs whose management tries to find a balance between conservation measures and the design of models that contribute to the socioeconomic development of their area of influence.

Keywords

policy support, protected area, natural resources management, behavioural economics, stakeholders, sustainable development

PDF

References

  1. Abbass, K., Qasim, M. Z., Song, H., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Younis, I. (2022). A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(28), 42539–42559.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Acharya, R. P., Maraseni, T. N., & Cockfield, G. (2019). Local users and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the identification and prioritization of ecosystem services in fragile mountains: A case study of Chure region of Nepal. Forests, 10(5), 421.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, S. F., Kumar, P. S., Kabir, M., Zuhara, F. T., Mehjabin, A., Tasannum, N., Hoang, A. T., Kabir, Z., & Mofijur, M. (2022). Threats, challenges and sustainable conservation strategies for freshwater biodiversity. Environmental Research, 214(P1), 113808.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Álvarez-Lorente, T., & Entrena-Durán, F. (2021). Potential for sustainable development in the Southeastern Spanish region of Guadix. Sustainability, 13(2), 727.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Anadón, J. D., Pérez-García, J. M., Pérez, I., Royo, J., & Sánchez-Zapata, J. A. (2018). Disentangling the effects of habitat, connectivity and interspecific competition in the range expansion of exotic and native ungulates. Landscape Ecology, 33(4), 597–608.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Asah, S. T., & Blahna, D. J. (2020). Involving stakeholders’ knowledge in co-designing social valuations of biodiversity and ecosystem services: Implications for decision-making. Ecosystems, 23(2), 324–337.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., López-Serrano, M. J., & Velasco-Muñoz, J. F. (2018). Forest ecosystem services: An analysis of worldwide research. Forests, 9(8), 453.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., López-Felices, B., & del Moral-Torres, F. (2020). Barriers and facilitators for adopting sustainable soil management practices in Mediterranean olive groves. Agronomy, 10(4), 506.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Baciu, G. E., Dobrotă, C. E., & Apostol, E. N. (2021). Valuing forest ecosystem services. Why is an integrative approach needed? Forests, 12(6), 677.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Bagheri, A., & Teymouri, A. (2022). Farmers’ intended and actual adoption of soil and water conservation practices. Agricultural Water Management, 259, 107244.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Bidegain, Í., López-Santiago, C. A., González, J. A., Martínez-Sastre, R., Ravera, F., & Cerda, C. (2020). Social valuation of Mediterranean cultural landscapes: Exploring landscape preferences and ecosystem services perceptions through a visual approach. Land, 9(10), 390.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Burke, R., Sherwood, O. L., Clune, S., Carroll, R., McCabe, P. F., Kane, A., & Kacprzyk, J. (2022). Botanical boom: A new opportunity to promote the public appreciation of botany. Plants, People, Planet, 4(4), 326–334.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. CBD Secretariat (2010). The strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi biodiversity targets.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Chen, D., Zhao, Q., Jiang, P., & Li, M. (2022). Incorporating ecosystem services to assess progress towards sustainable development goals: A case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Science of The Total Environment, 806(P3), 151277.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Ciftcioglu, G. C. (2020). Using a combination of Q-methodology and survey-based approach for assessing forest ecosystem services of Five Finger Mountains in Northern Cyprus. Sustainability Science, 15(6), 1789–1805.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Coelho-Junior, M. G., de Oliveira, A. L., da Silva-Neto, E. C., Castor-Neto, T. C., Tavares, A. A. d. O., Basso, V. M., Turetta, A. P. D., Perkins, P. E., & de Carvalho, A. G. (2021). Exploring plural values of ecosystem services: Local peoples’ perceptions and implications for protected area management in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. Sustainability, 13(3), 1019.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Coopmans, I., Dessein, J., Accatino, F., Antonioli, F., Bertolozzi-Caredio, D., Gavrilescu, C., Gradziuk, P., Manevska-Tasevska, G., Meuwissen, M., Peneva, M., Pettit, A., Urquhart, J., & Wauters, E. (2021). Understanding farm generational renewal and its influencing factors in Europe. Journal of Rural Studies, 86, 398–409.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. De Meo, I., Cantiani, M. G., Ferretti, F., & Paletto, A. (2018). Qualitative assessment of forest ecosystem services: The stakeholders’ point of view in support of landscape planning. Forests, 9(8), 465.
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Dehghani Pour, M., Barati, A. A., Azadi, H., Scheffran, J., & Shirkhani, M. (2023). Analyzing forest residents’ perception and knowledge of forest ecosystem services to guide forest management and biodiversity conservation. Forest Policy and Economics, 146, 102866.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Ding, Y., Zhao, M., Li, Z., Xia, B., Atutova, Z., & Kobylkin, D. (2022). Impact of education for sustainable development on cognition, emotion, and behavior in protected areas. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9769.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Dou, Y., Zhen, L., De Groot, R., Du, B., & Yu, X. (2017). Assessing the importance of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas of Beijing municipality. Ecosystem Services, 24, 79–90.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Ebner, M., Fontana, V., Schirpke, U., & Tappeiner, U. (2022). Stakeholder perspectives on ecosystem services of mountain lakes in the European Alps. Ecosystem Services, 53, 101386.
    View in Google Scholar
  23. EUROPARC Federation (2022). European charter for sustainable tourism in protected areas. Retrieved from https://www.europarc.org/library/europarc-events-and-programmes/european-charter-for-sustainable-tourism/.
    View in Google Scholar
  24. European Commission (1992). Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal L 206, 22/07/1992 P. 0007 - 0050. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31992L0043&from=EL.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. European Commission (2009). Directive 2009/147/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds. Document 02009L0147-20190626. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02009L0147-20190626.
    View in Google Scholar
  26. European Commission (2020). EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Bringing nature back into our lives. Brussels, COM/2020/380 final. Document 52020DC0380. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A520 20DC0380.
    View in Google Scholar
  27. European Commission (2022). Attitudes of Europeans towards air quality. 2660 / SP524. Retrieved from https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2660.
    View in Google Scholar
  28. European Environment Agency (2022). EUNIS - Site factsheet for Sierra Maria - Los Vélez. Retrieved from https://eunis.eea.europa.eu/sites/ES6110003.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Gardas, B. B., Raut, R. D., Cheikhrouhou, N., & Narkhede, B. E. (2019). A hybrid decision support system for analyzing challenges of the agricultural supply chain. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 18, 19–32.
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Giménez-Anaya, A., Bueno, C. G., Fernández-Llario, P., Fonseca, C., García-González, R., Herrero, J., Nores, C., & Rosell, C. (2020). What do we know about wild boar in Iberia? In F. M. Angelici & L. Rossi (Eds.). Problematic wildlife II: New conservation and management challenges in the human-wildlife interactions (pp. 251–271). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Groves, R. M., Fowler Jr., F., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2011). Survey methodology. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Gusman, I., & Lois-González, R. C. (2021). Building common identities to promote territorial development in the north of Portugal. In R. J. Howlett & L. C. Jain (Eds.). Smart innovation, systems and technologies (pp. 1918–1927). Cham: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH.
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Hasan, S. S., Zhen, L., Miah, M. G., Ahamed, T., & Samie, A. (2020). Impact of land use change on ecosystem services: A review. Environmental Development, 34, 100527.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Hochmalová, M., Purwestri, R. C., Yongfeng, J., Jarský, V., Riedl, M., Yuanyong, D., & Hájek, M. (2022). Demand for forest ecosystem services: A comparison study in selected areas in the Czech Republic and China. European Journal of Forest Research, 141(5), 867–886.
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Ingram, J., Mills, J., Black, J. E., Chivers, C. A., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Elsen, A., Frac, M., López-Felices, B., Mayer-Gruner, P., Skaalsveen, K., Stolte, J., & Tits, M. (2022). Do agricultural advisory services in Europe have the capacity to support the transition to healthy soils? Land, 11(5), 599.
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2022a). Agrarian Cernsus 2020. Retrieved from https://www.ine.es/uc/eDjXL6At.
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Jamean, E. S., & Abas, A. (2023). Valuation of visitor perception of urban forest ecosystem services in Kuala Lumpur. Land, 12(3), 572.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Janeczko, E., Banaś, J., Woźnicka, M., Zięba, S., Banaś, K. U., Janeczko, K., & Fialova, J. (2023). Sociocultural profile as a predictor of perceived importance of forest ecosystem services: A case study from Poland. Sustainability, 15(19), 14154.
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Kapsalis, V. C., Kyriakopoulos, G. L., & Aravossis, K. G. (2019). Investigation of ecosystem services and circular economy interactions under an inter-organizational framework. Energies, 12(9), 1734.
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Karimi, A., Yazdandad, H., & Fagerholm, N. (2020). Evaluating social perceptions of ecosystem services, biodiversity, and land management: Trade-offs, synergies and implications for landscape planning and management. Ecosystem Services, 45, 101188.
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Kičić, M., Haase, D., Marin, A. M., Vuletić, D., & Krajter Ostoić, S. (2022). Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services of tree-based green infrastructure: A focus group participatory mapping in Zagreb, Croatia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 78, 127767.
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Köninger, J., Panagos, P., Jones, A., Briones, M. J. I., & Orgiazzi, A. (2022). In defence of soil biodiversity: Towards an inclusive protection in the European Union. Biological Conservation, 268, 109475.
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Kyriakopoulos, G. L., & Kyriakopoulos, G. L. (2017). Ecosystems services valuation (ESV). Then and now: A review. In Advances in energy research (pp. 1–61). Nova Science Publishers.
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Kyriakopoulos, G. L., Solovev, D. B., Kuzora, S. S., & Terziev, V. (2020). Exploring research methods and dynamic systems toward economic development: An overview. In R. J. Howlett & L. C. Jain (Eds.). Smart innovation, systems and technologies (pp. 1–29). Cham: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH.
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Lazaridou, D. C., Michailidis, A., & Trigkas, M. (2021). Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a forest-based circular economy: A literature review. Forests, 12(4), 436.
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Lin, J. C., Chiou, C. R., Chan, W. H., & Wu, M. S. (2021). Public perception of forest ecosystem services in Taiwan. Journal of Forest Research, 26(5), 344–350.
    View in Google Scholar
  47. López-Felices, B., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., & Piquer-Rodríguez, M. (2020). Contribution of irrigation ponds to the sustainability of agriculture. A review of worldwide research. Sustainability, 12(13), 5425.
    View in Google Scholar
  48. López-Sanz, J. M., Penelas-Leguía, A., Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, P., & Cuesta-Valiño, P. (2021). Rural tourism and the sustainable development goals. A study of the variables that most influence the behavior of the tourist. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 722973.
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Maestre-Andrés, S., Calvet-Mir, L., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2016). Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services to improve protected area management: A multi-method approach applied to Catalonia, Spain. Regional Environmental Change, 16(3), 717–731.
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Maniatakou, S., Berg, H., Maneas, G., & Daw, T. M. (2020). Unravelling diverse values of ecosystem services: A socio-cultural valuation using Q methodology in Messenia, Greece. Sustainability, 12(24), 10320.
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Mann, C., Loft, L., & Hernández-Morcillo, M. (2021). Assessing forest governance innovations in Europe: Needs, challenges and ways forward for sustainable forest ecosystem service provision. Ecosystem Services, 52, 101384.
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Del Amo, D. G., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Oteros-Rozas, E., Palacios-Agundez, I., Willaarts, B., González, J. A., Santos-Martín, F., Onaindia, M., López-Santiago, C., & Montes, C. (2012). Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLOS ONE, 7(6), e38970.
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Meacham, M., Norström, A. V., Peterson, G. D., Andersson, E., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Crouzat, E., Cord, A. F., Enfors, E., Felipe-Lucia, M. R., Fischer, J., Hamann, M., Hanspach, J., Hicks, C., Jacobs, S., Lavorel, S., Locatelli, B., Martín-López, B., Plieninger, T., & Queiroz, C. (2022). Advancing research on ecosystem service bundles for comparative assessments and synthesis. Ecosystems and People, 18(1), 99–111.
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Meli, P., Vieli, L., Spirito, F., Reyes-Riveros, R., Gonzalez-Suhr, C., & Altamirano, A. (2023). The importance of considering human well-being to understand social preferences of ecosystem services. Journal for Nature Conservation, 72, 126344.
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Mensah, S., Veldtman, R., Assogbadjo, A. E., Ham, C., Glèlè Kakaï, R., & Seifert, T. (2017). Ecosystem service importance and use vary with socio-environmental factors: a study from household-surveys in local communities of South Africa. Ecosystem Services, 23, 1–8.
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Mills, J., Gaskell, P., Ingram, J., Dwyer, J., Reed, M., & Short, C. (2017). Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour. Agriculture and Human Values, 34(2), 283–299.
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Nardi, P. M. (2018). Developing a questionnaire. In P. M. Nardi (Ed.) Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods (pp. 71–113). New York: Routledge.
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Ochoa-Noriega, C., Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., & López-Felices, B. (2022). Analysis of the acceptance of sustainable practices in water management for the intensive agriculture of the Costa de Hermosillo (Mexico). Agronomy, 12(1), 154.
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Oldekop, J. A., Holmes, G., Harris, W. E., & Evans, K. L. (2016). A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conservation Biology, 30(1), 133–141.
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Paing, J. N., van Bussel, L. G. J., Gomez, R. A., & Hein, L. G. (2022). Ecosystem services through the lens of indigenous people in the highlands of Cordillera Region, Northern Philippines. Journal of Environmental Management, 308, 114597.
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Panzera, E. (2022). Cultural heritage and territorial identity. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH.
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Pastorella, F., Giacovelli, G., Maesano, M., Paletto, A., Vivona, S., Veltri, A., Pellicone, G., & Mugnozza, G. S. (2016). Social perception of forest multifunctionality in southern Italy: The case of Calabria region. Journal of Forest Science, 62(8), 366–379.
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Pérez-Calderón, E., Miguel-Barrado, V., & Sánchez-Cubo, F. (2022). Tourism business in Spanish National Parks: A multidimensional perspective of sustainable tourism. Land, 11(2), 190.
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Pérez-Sánchez, D., Montes, M., Cardona-Almeida, C., Vargas-Marín, L. A., Enríquez-Acevedo, T., & Suarez, A. (2021). Keeping people in the loop: Socioeconomic valuation of dry forest ecosystem services in the Colombian Caribbean region. Journal of Arid Environments, 188, 104446.
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Peter, S., Le Provost, G., Mehring, M., Müller, T., & Manning, P. (2022). Cultural worldviews consistently explain bundles of ecosystem service prioritisation across rural Germany. People and Nature, 4(1), 218–230.
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Purwestri, R. C., Palátová, P., Hájek, M., Dudík, R., Jarský, V., & Riedl, M. (2023). Public perception of the performance of Czech forest ecosystem services. Environmental Sciences Europe, 35(1), 89.
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Rastegar, R., Breakey, N., Driml, S., & Ruhanen, L. (2022). Does tourism development shift residents’ attitudes to the environment and protected area management? Tourism Recreation Research. Advance online publication.
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Rosenthal, M. (2016). Qualitative research methods: Why, when, and how to conduct interviews and focus groups in pharmacy research. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 8(4), 509–516.
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Sapbamrer, R., & Thammachai, A. (2021). A systematic review of factors influencing farmers’ adoption of organic farming. Sustainability, 13(7), 3842.
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Segado-Castro, G., & Zamora-Díaz, R. (2016). Forest conflicts and public intervention. The case of the forests of María and Vélez Blanco (Almeria, Spain). 1879–1901. Forest Policy and Economics, 70, 80–90.
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Schoonhoven, Y., & Runhaar, H. (2018). Conditions for the adoption of agro-ecological farming practices: A holistic framework illustrated with the case of almond farming in Andalusia. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 16(6), 442–454.
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Shishany, S., Al-Assaf, A. A., Majdalawi, M., Tabieh, M., & Tadros, M. (2022). Factors influencing local communities relational values to forest protected areas in Jordan. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 41(8), 659–677.
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Silva, S., Silva, L. F., & Vieira, A. (2023). Protected areas and nature-based tourism: A 30-year bibliometric review. Sustainability, 15(15), 11698.
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Stipoljev, S., Safner, T., Gančević, P., Galov, A., Stuhne, T., Svetličić, I., Grignolio, S., Cassinello, J., & Šprem, N. (2021). Population structure and genetic diversity of non-native aoudad populations. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12300, 1–9.
    View in Google Scholar
  75. Stratton, S. J. (2018). Likert Data. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 33(2), 117–118.
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Streimikiene, D., Svagzdiene, B., Jasinskas, E., & Simanavicius, A. (2021). Sustainable tourism development and competitiveness: The systematic literature review. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 259–271.
    View in Google Scholar
  77. Toro-Mujica, P., & Riveros, J. L. (2021). Sheep production systems in Chilean Patagonia. Characterization and typology. Small Ruminant Research, 204, 106516.
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Tovar-Tique, Y. P., Escobedo, F. J., & Clerici, N. (2021). Community-based importance and quantification of ecosystem services, disservices, drivers, and neotropical dry forests in a rural Colombian municipality. Forests, 12(7), 919.
    View in Google Scholar
  79. UN General Assembly (2017). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, A/RES/70/1.
    View in Google Scholar
  80. UNEP-WCMC, & IUCN (2022). Protected planet: The world database on protected Areas (WDPA).
    View in Google Scholar
  81. Vanino, S., Pirelli, T., Di Bene, C., Bøe, F., Castanheira, N., Chenu, C., Cornu, S., Feiza, V., Fornara, D., Heller, O., Kasparinskis, R., Keesstra, S., Lasorella, M. V., Madenoğlu, S., Meurer, K. H. E., O’Sullivan, L., Peter, N., Piccini, C., Siebielec, G., Smreczak, B., Thorsøe, M. H., & Farina, R. (2023). Barriers and opportunities of soil knowledge to address soil challenges: Stakeholders’ perspectives across Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 325, 116581.
    View in Google Scholar
  82. Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., López-Felices, B., & Balacco, G. (2022a). Adopting sustainable water management practices in agriculture based on stakeholder preferences. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 68, 317–326.
    View in Google Scholar
  83. Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Schoenemann, M., & López-Felices, B. (2022b). The economic valuation of ecosystem services: Bibliometric analysis. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 977–1014.
    View in Google Scholar
  84. Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Schoenemann, M., & López-Felices, B. (2022c). An analysis of the worldwide research on the socio-cultural valuation of forest ecosystem services. Sustainability, 14(4), 2089.
    View in Google Scholar
  85. Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., Mendoza, J. M. F., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., & Gallego-Schmid, A. (2021). Circular economy implementation in the agricultural sector: Definition, strategies and indicators. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 170, 105618.
    View in Google Scholar
  86. Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Giacosa, E., & Serravalle, F. (2022). Sustainable development in tourism: A stakeholder analysis of the Langhe Region. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 46(5), 846–878.
    View in Google Scholar
  87. Walz, A., Schmidt, K., Ruiz-Frau, A., Nicholas, K. A., Bierry, A., de Vries Lentsch, A., Dyankov, A., Joyce, D., Liski, A. H., Marbà, N., Rosário, I. T., & Scholte, S. S. K. (2019). Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services for operational ecosystem management: Mapping applications by decision contexts in Europe. Regional Environmental Change, 19(8), 2245–2259.
    View in Google Scholar
  88. Wiesli, T. X., Hammer, T., & Knaus, F. (2022). Improving quality of life for residents of biosphere reserves and nature parks: Management recommendations from Switzerland. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy, 18(1), 601–615.
    View in Google Scholar
  89. Xu, W., Xiao, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, W., Zhang, L., Hull, V., Wang, Z., Zheng, H., Liu, J., Polasky, S., Jiang, L., Xiao, Y., Shi, X., Rao, E., Lu, F., Wang, X., Daily, G. C., & Ouyang, Z. (2017). Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(7), 1601–1606.
    View in Google Scholar
  90. Zabala, J. A., Martínez-Paz, J. M., & Alcon, F. (2021). A comprehensive approach for agroecosystem services and disservices valuation. Science of the Total Environment, 768, 144859.
    View in Google Scholar
  91. Zhang, H., Pang, Q., Long, H., Zhu, H., Gao, X., Li, X., Jiang, X., & Liu, K. (2019). Local residents’ perceptions for ecosystem services: A case study of Fenghe river watershed. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 3602.
    View in Google Scholar
  92. Zoderer, B. M., Lupo Stanghellini, P. S., Tasser, E., Walde, J., Wieser, H., & Tappeiner, U. (2016). Exploring socio-cultural values of ecosystem service categories in the Central Alps: The influence of socio-demographic factors and landscape type. Regional Environmental Change, 16(7), 2033–2044.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 403

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)