Sustainable growth rate, corporate value of US firms within capital and labor market distortions: The moderating effect of institutional quality

Abstract

Research background: Understanding how distortions in capital and labor markets affect corporate value and sustainable growth is crucial in today's economy. These distortions can disrupt resource allocation and economic sustainability. Additionally, the role of institutional quality in shaping these dynamics requires thorough exploration.

Purpose of the article: We quantify the effect of capital and labor market distortions on corporate value and sustainable growth rate (SGR) and how this association is moderated by institutional quality.

Methods: Stemming from the sample criteria, we calibrated a final sample of 1971 United States-listed manufacturing firms for 2012–2022. This research offers insights into market inefficiencies and institutional effects. Progressing towards objectives, we use advanced techniques like feasible generalized least squares and generalized methods of moments. These methods help us rigorously analyze complex relationships among study variables.

Findings & value added: Three key findings emerge: first, capital and labor market distortions have a negative and significant influence on corporate value and sustainable growth. Our primary finding implies that increasing distortions significantly reduce sustainable growth's value and potential. Second, we find institutional quality has a positive significant effect on corporate value and sustainable growth. Third, institutional quality positively moderates the association between capital and labor market distortions, corporate value, and sustainable growth. Findings suggest that institutional quality, as a potential mechanism, improves the efficiency of resource allocation and optimizes the sustainable economic system to lessen the negative effect of factor market distortions on corporate value and SGR. Besides, we conduct robustness checks to validate our findings. Finally, we offer policymakers and stakeholders actionable insights.

Keywords

factor market distortion, capital and labor market distortions, corporate value, institutional quality, corporate sustainable growth rate, micro-level analysis

References

1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.). Handbook of economic growth (pp. 385–472). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3
   View in Google Scholar
2. Afzal, A., Rasoulinezhad, E., & Malik, Z. (2022). Green finance and sustainable development in Europe. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 35(1), 5150–5163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.2024081
   View in Google Scholar
3. Alam, M. J. (2020). Capital misallocation: Cyclicality and sources. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 112, 103831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2020.103831
   View in Google Scholar
4. Anderson, R. B. (1960). Financial policies for sustainable growth. Journal of Finance, 15(2), 127–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1960.tb00158.x
   View in Google Scholar
5. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
   View in Google Scholar
6. Bai, P., & Cheng, W. (2016). Labour misallocation in China: 1980–2010. Applied Economics, 48(25), 2321–2332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1119790
   View in Google Scholar
7. Banerjee, A., & Munshi, K. (2004). How efficiently is capital allocated? Evidence from the knitted garment industry in Tirupur. Review of Economic Studies, 71(1), 19–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00274
   View in Google Scholar
8. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2005). Growth theory through the lens of development economics. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.). Handbook of economic growth (pp. 473–552). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01007-5
   View in Google Scholar
9. Bartelsman, E., Haltiwanger, J., & Scarpetta, S. (2013). Cross-country differences in productivity: The role of allocation and selection. American Economic Review, 103(1), 305–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.1.305
   View in Google Scholar
10. Bernardelli, M., Próchniak, M., & Witkowski, B. (2021). Time stability of the impact of institutions on economic growth and real convergence of the EU countries: implications from the hidden Markov models analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(2), 285–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.011
    View in Google Scholar
11. Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2004). Can labor regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 91–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355304772839533
    View in Google Scholar
12. Bhagwati, J., Ramaswami, V. K., & Srinivasan, T. N. (1969). Domestic distortions, tariffs, and the theory of optimum subsidy: Some further results. Journal of Political Economy, 77(6), 1005–1010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/259587
    View in Google Scholar
13. Bougatef, K., & Nejah, I. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic and herding behaviour among investors in Shariah-compliant stocks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(5), 832–844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2021-0237
    View in Google Scholar
14. Buckley, P. J., & Tian, X. (2017). Internalization theory and the performance of emerging-market multinational enterprises. International Business Review, 26(5), 976–990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.03.005
    View in Google Scholar
15. Butt, M. N., Baig, A. S., & Seyyed, F. J. (2023). Tobin’s Q approximation as a metric of firm performance: An empirical evaluation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 31(3), 532–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2021.1947875
    View in Google Scholar
16. Chang, C.-C. (2023). The impact of quality of institutions on firm performance: A global analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 83, 694–716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.10.002
    View in Google Scholar
17. Chen, X., Liu, C., Liu, F., & Fang, M. (2021). Firm sustainable growth during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of customer concentration. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(6), 1566–1577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1904884
    View in Google Scholar
18. Cheng, H., Wang, Z., Peng, D., & Kong, Q. (2020). Firm’s outward foreign direct investment and efficiency loss of factor price distortion: Evidence from Chinese firms. International Review of Economics & Finance, 67, 176–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.01.008
    View in Google Scholar
19. Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249–272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6
    View in Google Scholar
20. Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3665623
    View in Google Scholar
21. Da-Rocha, J.-M., Restuccia, D., & Tavares, M. M. (2023). Policy distortions and aggregate productivity with endogenous establishment-level productivity. European Economic Review, 155, 104444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104444
    View in Google Scholar
22. Dai, X., & Cheng, L. (2016). Market distortions and aggregate productivity: Evidence from Chinese energy enterprises. Energy Policy, 95, 304–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.009
    View in Google Scholar
23. de Andrés, P., de la Fuente, G., & Velasco, P. (2017). Does it really matter how a firm diversifies? Assets-in-place diversification versus growth options diversification. Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 316–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.01.011
    View in Google Scholar
24. Diaz Tautiva, J. A., Salvaj Carrera, E., Vásquez-Lavín, F., & Ponce Oliva, R. D. (2023). Understanding the role of institutions and economic context on entrepreneurial value creation choice. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(2), 405–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.011
    View in Google Scholar
25. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
    View in Google Scholar
26. Dollar, D., Hallward-Driemeier, M., & Mengistae, T. (2006). Investment climate and international integration. World Development, 34(9), 1498–1516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.001
    View in Google Scholar
27. Fomba, B. K., Talla, D. N. D. F., & Ningaye, P. (2023). Institutional quality and education quality in developing countries: Effects and transmission channels. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(1), 86–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00869-9
    View in Google Scholar
28. Gabler, A., & Poschke, M. (2013). Experimentation by firms, distortions, and aggregate productivity. Review of Economic Dynamics, 16(1), 26–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2012.10.010
    View in Google Scholar
29. Glaeser, E. L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004). Do institutions cause growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 9(3), 271–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000038933.16398.ed
    View in Google Scholar
30. Higgins, R. C., Koski, J. L., & Mitton, T. (2009). Managing growth. In Analysis for financial management. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
    View in Google Scholar
31. Hsieh, C.-T., & Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1403–1448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1403
    View in Google Scholar
32. Johnson, H. G. (1966). Factor market distortions and the shape of the transformation curve. Econometrica, 34(3), 686–698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1909777
    View in Google Scholar
33. Jouida, S., Bouzgarrou, H., & Hellara, S. (2017). The effects of activity and geographic diversification on performance: Evidence from French financial institutions. Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 920–939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.01.028
    View in Google Scholar
34. Karmani, M., & Boussaada, R. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Does institutional quality matter? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(4), 641–662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-07-2020-0153
    View in Google Scholar
35. Khan, M. A., Kong, D., Xiang, J., & Zhang, J. (2020). Impact of institutional quality on financial development: Cross-country evidence based on emerging and growth-leading economies. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(15), 3829–3845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1588725
    View in Google Scholar
36. Klein, D. P., & Belt, B. (1994). Sustainable growht and choice of financing: A test of the pecking order hypothesis. Review of Financial Economics, 3(2), 141–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1873-5924.1994.tb00578.x
    View in Google Scholar
37. Kong, Q., Tong, X., Peng, D., Wong, Z., & Chen, H. (2021). How factor market distortions affect OFDI: An explanation based on investment propensity and productivity effects. International Review of Economics & Finance, 73, 459–472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.12.025
    View in Google Scholar
38. Kutan, A. M., Samargandi, N., & Sohag, K. (2017). Does institutional quality matter for financial development and growth? Further evidence from MENA countries. Australian Economic Papers, 56(3), 228–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12097
    View in Google Scholar
39. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 222–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.1.222
    View in Google Scholar
40. Lach, S. (2002). Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(4), 369–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00182
    View in Google Scholar
41. Němečková, T., & Hayat, A. (2022). Does trade openness improve the quality of domestic institutions? Evidence from Africa. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17(4), 881–908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.030
    View in Google Scholar
42. Olson, G. T., & Pagano, M. S. (2005). A new application of sustainable growth: A multi‐dimensional framework for evaluating the long run performance of bank mergers. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(9‐10), 1995–2036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00656.x
    View in Google Scholar
43. Ouyang, X., & Sun, C. (2015). Energy savings potential in China's industrial sector: From the perspectives of factor price distortion and allocative inefficiency. Energy Economics, 48, 117–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.11.020
    View in Google Scholar
44. Ouyang, X., Wei, X., Sun, C., & Du, G. (2018). Impact of factor price distortions on energy efficiency: Evidence from provincial-level panel data in China. Energy Policy, 118, 573–583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.022
    View in Google Scholar
45. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
    View in Google Scholar
46. Platt, H. D., Platt, M. B., & Chen, G. (1995). Sustainable growth rate of firms in financial distress. Journal of Economics and Finance, 19(2), 147–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920515
    View in Google Scholar
47. Qiao, S., Chen, H. H., & Zhang, R. R. (2021a). Examining the impact of factor price distortions and social welfare on innovation efficiency from the microdata of Chinese renewable energy industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110901
    View in Google Scholar
48. Qiao, S., Shen, T., Zhang, R. R., & Chen, H. H. (2021b). The impact of various factor market distortions and innovation efficiencies on profit sustainable growth: From the view of China's renewable energy industry. Energy Strategy Reviews, 38, 100746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100746
    View in Google Scholar
49. Rahi, A. B. M. F., Chowdhury, M. A. F., Johansson, J., & Blomkvist, M. (2023). Nexus between institutional quality and corporate sustainable performance: European evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 135188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135188
    View in Google Scholar
50. Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1998). Financial dependence and growth. American Economic Review, 88(3), 559–586.
    View in Google Scholar
51. Restuccia, D., & Rogerson, R. (2008). Policy distortions and aggregate productivity with heterogeneous establishments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(4), 707–720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2008.05.002
    View in Google Scholar
52. Schauer, C., Elsas, R., & Breitkopf, N. (2019). A new measure of financial constraints applicable to private and public firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 101, 270–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.01.008
    View in Google Scholar
53. She, Y., Hong, J., & Ji, C. (2023). How do formal and informal institutional distance affect the reverse knowledge spillover of Chinese MNCs? European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(3), 617–635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2021-0180
    View in Google Scholar
54. Shen, X.-J., Liu, S.-X., Bao, B.-K., Pan, C.-H., Zha, Z.-J., & Fan, J. (2020). A generalized least-squares approach regularized with graph embedding for dimensionality reduction. Pattern Recognition, 98, 107023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2019.107023
    View in Google Scholar
55. Soppe, A. (2004). Sustainable corporate finance. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 213–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039410.18373.12
    View in Google Scholar
56. Tao, Z., Huang, X. Y., Dang, Y. J., & Qiao, S. (2022). The impact of factor market distortions on profit sustainable growth of Chinese renewable energy enterprises: The moderating effect of environmental regulation. Renewable Energy, 200, 1068–1080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.037
    View in Google Scholar
57. Uras, B. R. (2014). Corporate financial structure, misallocation and total factor productivity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 39, 177–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.11.011
    View in Google Scholar
58. Van Horne, J. C., & Wachowicz Jr, J. M. (2005). Sustainable growth modeling. In Fundamentals of financial management. FT Publishing International.
    View in Google Scholar
59. Vatn, A. (2020). Institutions for sustainability—towards an expanded research program for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 168, 106507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106507
    View in Google Scholar
60. Wu, J., Ma, Z., Liu, Z., & Lei, C. K. (2019). A contingent view of institutional environment, firm capability, and innovation performance of emerging multinational enterprises. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 148–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.01.018
    View in Google Scholar
61. Xu, X. L., Sun, C., Li, Y., & Zhou, N. (2020). The effects of environmental management and debt financing on sustainable financial growth in the tourism industry. Sage Open, 10(3), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020948530
    View in Google Scholar
62. Yang, M., Yang, F., & Sun, C. (2018). Factor market distortion correction, resource reallocation and potential productivity gains: An empirical study on China's heavy industry sector. Energy Economics, 69, 270–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.021
    View in Google Scholar
63. Zhang, S., Chen, C., Huang, D.-H., & Hu, L. (2022). Measurement of factor price distortion: A new production function method with time-varying elasticity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121363
    View in Google Scholar