How empathy and social entrepreneurial self-efficacy interact to affect social entrepreneurial intention: A polynomial regression with response surface analysis

Abstract

Research background: Previous studies have argued that empathy (EMP) is an important factor that enhances individuals’ intention to engage in social business. However, the effect of this factor on social entrepreneurial intention (SEI) is unclear (Ukil et al., 2023). Also, although numerous studies have explored the individual impacts of EMP and social entrepreneurial self-efficacy (SES) on SEI, there is a notable scarcity of research that delves into the combined influence of these two predictor variables on the intention to engage in social business.

Purpose of the article: This study proposes that EMP does not only individually affect, but also interacts with other factors to influence the intention to start a social business. Therefore, this study aims to investigate how EMP and SES interact to promote SEI.

Methods: Based on a survey dataset of 409 respondents in Vietnam, this study employed polynomial regression with response surface analysis to examine the complementary, balance, and imbalance effects of EMP and SES on SEI.

Findings & value added: This study's results suggest complementary effects between EMP and SES on SEI. Specifically, this study finds that when EMP and SES are balanced at higher levels, SEI is higher, and when their imbalance increases in either direction, SEI is lower. In addition, this study finds that the degree of SEI is higher when individuals have high SES with low EMP compared to the other way round. The findings of this study enhance our understanding of the complexity of motivation and how it affects SEIs, revealing the complex interaction between EMP and SES in shaping these intentions within a multidimensional motivational framework.

Keywords

social social entrepreneurial intention, empathy, social entrepreneurial self-efficacy, polynomial regression, response surface analysis

References

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   View in Google Scholar
2. Aloulou, W. J., & Algarni, E. A. (2022). Determinants of social entrepreneurial intention: Empirical evidence from the Saudi context. Social Enterprise Journal, 18(4), 605–625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-11-2021-0086
   View in Google Scholar
3. Ashraf, M. A. (2020). “Is old gold?” the role of prior experience in exploring the determinants of islamic social entrepreneurial intentions: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 265–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2019.1702580
   View in Google Scholar
4. Bacq, S., & Alt, E. (2018). Feeling capable and valued: A prosocial perspective on the link between empathy and social entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(3), 333–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.01.004
   View in Google Scholar
5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freemann & Co.
   View in Google Scholar
6. Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306970
   View in Google Scholar
7. Bui, D. T., Nghia Vu, T., Tran, T. V. H., Duong, C. D., & Loan Le, T. (2023). Impact of institutional environment on social entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100120
   View in Google Scholar
8. Canestrino, R., Ćwiklicki, M., Magliocca, P., & Pawełek, B. (2020). Understanding social entrepreneurship: A cultural perspective in business research. Journal of Business Research, 110, 132–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.006
   View in Google Scholar
9. Chiengkul, W., Tantipanichkul, T., Boonchom, W., Phuangpornpitak, W., & Suphan, K. (2023). Social entrepreneurship of small and medium-sized entrepreneurs in Thailand: Influence of institutional environment, entrepreneurial passions, and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Social Enterprise Journal, 19(4), 370–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-01-2023-0005
   View in Google Scholar
10. Cui, J., & Bell, R. (2022). Behavioural entrepreneurial mindset: How entrepreneurial education activity impacts entrepreneurial intention and behaviour. International Journal of Management Education, 20(2), 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100639
    View in Google Scholar
11. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187
    View in Google Scholar
12. Do, M. N. (2022). The key for success in the value chain of a social entrepreneur in Vietnam. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-01-2022-0019
    View in Google Scholar
13. Duong, C. D. (2023a). Applying the stimulus-organism-response theory to investigate determinants of students’ social entrepreneurship: Moderation role of perceived university support. Social Enterprise Journal, 19(2), 167–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-10-2022-0091
    View in Google Scholar
14. Duong, C. D. (2023b). Karmic beliefs and social entrepreneurial intentions: A moderated mediation model of environmental complexity and empathy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100022
    View in Google Scholar
15. Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(1), 51–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1029
    View in Google Scholar
16. Ennen, E., & Richter, A. (2010). The whole is more than the sum of its parts –or is it? A review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organisations. Journal of Management, 36(1), 207–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350083
    View in Google Scholar
17. Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., Veiga, P. M., & Hughes, M. (2021). Prevailing theoretical approaches predicting sustainable business models: A systematic review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(3), 790–813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2020-0653
    View in Google Scholar
18. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
    View in Google Scholar
19. Hassan, H. M. K. (2020). Intention towards social entrepreneurship of university students in an emerging economy: The influence of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurship education. On the Horizon, 28(3), 133–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-04-2020-0012
    View in Google Scholar
20. Hoang, G., Luu, T. T., Le, T. T. T., & Tran, A. K. T. (2022). Dark Triad traits affecting entrepreneurial intentions: The roles of opportunity recognition and locus of control. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 17, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00310
    View in Google Scholar
21. Hockerts, K. (2017). Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 105–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12171
    View in Google Scholar
22. Ip, C. Y., Zhuge, T., Chang, Y. S., Huang, T. H., & Chen, Y. L. (2022). Exploring the determinants of nascent social entrepreneurial Behaviour. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063556
    View in Google Scholar
23. Ko, E.-J., & Kang, J. (2022). How gender moderates the mediating mechanism across social experience, self-referent beliefs and social entrepreneurship intentions. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 37(8), 1045–1063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-06-2021-0175
    View in Google Scholar
24. Ko, E.-J., & Kim, K. (2020). Connecting founder social identity with social entrepreneurial intentions. Social Enterprise Journal, 16(4), 403–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-02-2020-0012
    View in Google Scholar
25. Krueger, J. N. F., & Carsrud, A. L. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 5(4), 315–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629300000020
    View in Google Scholar
26. Lacap, J. P. G., Mulyaningsih, H. D., & Ramadani, V. (2018). The mediating effects of social entrepreneurial antecedents on the relationship between prior experience and social entrepreneurial intent. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 9(3), 329–346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2018-0028
    View in Google Scholar
27. Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross–cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593–617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x
    View in Google Scholar
28. Loan, L. T., Doanh, D. C., Thang, H. N., Viet Nga, N. T., Van, P. T., & Hoa, P. T. (2021). Entrepreneurial behaviour: The effects of the fear and anxiety of Covid-19 and business opportunity recognition. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(3), 7–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090301
    View in Google Scholar
29. Maheshwari, G., & Kha, K. L. (2022). Investigating the relationship between educational support and entrepreneurial intention in Vietnam: The mediating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy in the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Management Education, 20(2) 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100553
    View in Google Scholar
30. Mair, J. & Noboa, E. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: How intentions to create a social venture are formed. In J. Mair, J. Robinson & K. Hockerts (Eds). Social entrepreneurship (pp. 121–135). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625655_8
    View in Google Scholar
31. Meoli, A., Fini, R., Sobrero, M., & Wiklund, J. (2020). How entrepreneurial intentions influence entrepreneurial career choices: The moderating influence of social context. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(3), 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105982
    View in Google Scholar
32. Muldoon, J., Davis, P. E., Bendickson, J. S., McDowell, W. C., & Liguori, E. W. (2022). Paved with good intentions: Moral disengagement and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100237
    View in Google Scholar
33. Mykolenko, O., Ippolitova, I., Doroshenko, H., & Strapchuk, S. (2021). The impact of entrepreneurship education and cultural context on entrepreneurial intentions of Ukrainian students: The mediating role of attitudes and perceived control. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 12(3), 519–536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-08-2020-0190
    View in Google Scholar
34. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
    View in Google Scholar
35. Packard, M. D., & Burnham, T. A. (2021). Do we understand each other? Toward a simulated empathy theory for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(1), 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106076
    View in Google Scholar
36. Qiu, S., Dooley, L. M., & Xie, L. (2020). How servant leadership and self-efficacy interact to affect service quality in the hospitality industry: A polynomial regression with response surface analysis. Tourism Management, 78, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104051
    View in Google Scholar
37. Rey-Martí, A., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1651–1655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.033
    View in Google Scholar
38. Sahasranamam, S., & Nandakumar, M. K. (2020). Individual capital and social entrepreneurship: Role of formal institutions. Journal of Business Research, 107, 104–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.09.005
    View in Google Scholar
39. Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4
    View in Google Scholar
40. Shepherd, D. A., Seyb, S., & Williams, T. A. (2023). Empathy-driven entrepreneurial action: Well-being outcomes for entrepreneurs and target beneficiaries. Journal of Business Venturing, 38(2), 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106290
    View in Google Scholar
41. Shirokova, G., Osiyevskyy, O., & Bogatyreva, K. (2016). Exploring the intention–behavior link in student entrepreneurship: Moderating effects of individual and environmental characteristics. European Management Journal, 34(4), 386–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.12.007
    View in Google Scholar
42. Sousa-Filho, J. M. d., Matos, S., da Silva Trajano, S., & de Souza Lessa, B. (2020). Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions in a developing country context. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00207
    View in Google Scholar
43. Thi Tuyet Mai, N. (2019). An investigation into the relationship between materialism and green purchase behavior in Vietnam and Taiwan. Journal of Economics and Development, 21(2), 247–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-10-2019-0044
    View in Google Scholar
44. Tsai, C.-Y., Kim, J., Jin, F., Jun, M., Cheong, M., & Yammarino, F. J. (2022). Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology in leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 33(1), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101592
    View in Google Scholar
45. Ukil, M. I., Almashayekhi, A., & Ullah, M. S. (2023). Feeling compassion and responsible but not starting a social venture: Role of empathy and moral obligation in social entrepreneurial intention. Society and Business Review. Advance online publicaton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-09-2022-0227
    View in Google Scholar
46. Usman, S., Masood, F., Khan, M. A., & Khan, N. u. R. (2021). Impact of empathy, perceived social impact, social worth and social network on the social entrepreneurial intention in socio-economic projects. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 14(1), 65–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-10-2020-0355
    View in Google Scholar
47. Younis, A., Xiaobao, P., Nadeem, M. A., Kanwal, S., Pitafi, A. H., Qiong, G., & Yuzhen, D. (2020). Impact of positivity and empathy on social entrepreneurial intention: The moderating role of perceived social support. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(1), e2124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2124
    View in Google Scholar
48. Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
    View in Google Scholar
49. Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Ahrari, S., Krauss, S. E., Samah, A. A., Meng, L. K., & Ariffin, Z. (2019). Predicting social entrepreneurial intention: A meta-analytic path analysis based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Research, 96, 264–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.030
    View in Google Scholar
50. Zhang, Y., Trusty, J., Goroshnikova, T., Kelly, L., Kwong, K. K., McGuire, S. J. J., Perusquia, J., Prabhu, V.P., Shen, M. and Tang, R. (2021). Millennial social entrepreneurial intent and social entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A comparative entrepreneurship study. Social Enterprise Journal, 17(1), 20–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-07-2020-0054
    View in Google Scholar