Vol. 15 No. 3 (2024)

Articles

The nexus between economic policy uncertainty and innovation performance in Visegrad group countries

Published 30-09-2024

Arif Ibne Asad
Tomas Bata University in Zlín

Boris Popesko
Tomas Bata University in Zlín

Milan Damborský
Tomas Bata University in Zlín

Abstract

Research background: Research and development (R&D) spending and innovation initiatives play a crucial role in promoting growth. However, economic policy uncertainty (EPU) is a reality that cannot be avoided when making business decisions. The Visegrad Group (V4), consisting of Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia, is considered a regional alliance of four Central European countries with significant potential for innovation and economic development because these nations’ economies are encountering the so-called ‘middle-income trap’.

Purpose of the article: The paper’s main objective is to examine the impact of economic policy uncertainty on innovation performance and R&D expenditures in the Visegrad Group countries. 

Methods: The study used comparative panel models analysis (fixed effect, random effect, and system generalized method of moments [GMM]) between 2012 and 2021. The models include the lag periods for EPU to provide a better perspective on the short-term impact and even long-term consequences of EPU.

Findings & value added: The directions of innovation output and R&D expenditures are directly related to EPU. In V4 economies, businesses may reduce their spending on R&D and innovation activities when confronted with high EPU; however, over time, the volatility of economic uncertainties is adjusted for. Additionally, the political and economic control variables increase the number of dimensions used in the models, which will motivate additional EPU studies in the field. Although EPU studies are widely accepted, our investigation shows that the topic is still not properly developed for Visegrad Group countries in relation to how EPU affects innovation activity. Another unique feature of the current study is the diversity of variables used, including the EPU lag variables, variables representing essential economic and political issues, as well as control variables, thus incorporating complex panel models.

Keywords

economic policy uncertainty (EPU), innovation, research and development (R&D) spending, system generalized method of moments (GMM), Visegrad Group countries

PDF

References

  1. Ali, W., Haider, S., Sagheer, O., & Ali, M. (2022). Does government effectiveness spur technological innovation? A cross-country empirical study. Pacific Business Review (International), 14(11), 45–57.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Al-Thaqeb, S. A., & Algharabali, B. G. (2019). Economic policy uncertainty: A literature review. Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 20, e00133.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2019.e00133
  3. Al‐Thaqeb, S. A., Algharabali, B. G., & Alabdulghafour, K. T. (2022). The pandemic and economic policy uncertainty. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(3), 2784–2794.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2298
  4. Avom, D., Njangang, H., & Nawo, L. (2020). World economic policy uncertainty and foreign direct investment. Economics Bulletin, 40(2), 1457–1464.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
  6. Bartha, S., & Bontempi, M. E. (2022). Measuring economic uncertainty for Poland. Quaderni. Working Paper DSE, 1178.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4277398
  7. Békesová, D., & Bohdalová, M. (2022). Impact of uncertainty on Hungarian, Czech, and Polish currencies. Proceedings Of CBU In Economics and Business, 3, 19–24.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.12955/peb.v3.288
  8. Bhattacharya, U., Hsu, P. H., Tian, X., & Xu, Y. (2017). What affects innovation more: Policy or policy uncertainty? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(5), 1869–1901.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017000540
  9. Bobba, M., & Coviello, D. (2007). Weak instruments and weak identification, in estimating the effects of education, on democracy. Economics Letters, 96(3), 301–306.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.01.018
  10. Bod, P. Á. (2019). Hungarian economic policy between 1989 and 2019. Economy and Finance, 6(1), 17–42.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.33908/EF.2019.1.2
  11. Brandt, R. (2021). Economic Policy Uncertainty Index: Extension and optimization of Scott R. Baker, Nicholas Bloom and Steven J. Davis’s search term. DoCMA Working Paper, 5.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Csath, M. (2022). Growth or development trap. Financial and Economic Review, 21(2), 152–174.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.21.2.152
  13. Cui, X., Wang, C., Sensoy, A., Liao, J., & Xie, X. (2023). Economic policy uncertainty and green innovation: Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 118, 106104.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106104
  14. Das, D., Kannadhasan, M., & Bhattacharyya, M. (2019). Do the emerging stock markets react to international economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk and financial stress alike? North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 48, 1–19.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2019.01.008
  15. European Commission (2023). In-depth review 2023, Slovakia. European Union Institutional Paper 223. Retrieved from https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/ system/files/2023-05/ip223_en.pdf (26.11.2023).
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Fidrmuc, J., Fidrmuc, J., & Horvath, J. (2002). Visegrad Group countries: Growth experience and prospects. Report prepared for the GDN global research project: determinants of economic growth. Bonn: Centre for European Integration Studies.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Fu, X., & Shi, L. (2022). Direction of innovation in developing countries and its driving forces. Economic Research Working Paper, 69.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4422271
  18. Godlewska, M., Banasik, P., & Morawska, S. (2022). The impact of institutions on innovation networks: Empirical evidence from Poland. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(4), 1068–1088.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.16781
  19. Guney, P. Ö. (2019). Macroeconomic uncertainty and private investment: The case of Poland. International Journal of Economics and Administrative Studies, 22, 93–106.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.404607
  20. Hagelaar, G. (2018). Influencing factors in innovation on individual and group level. Beerkens, bas. Wageningen University and Research. Geoffrey Hagelaar, MST-81812.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Hao, Z., Zhang, X., & Wei, J. (2022). Research on the effect of enterprise financial flexibility on sustainable innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2), 100184.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100184
  22. He, F., Ma, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). How does economic policy uncertainty affect corporate Innovation?–Evidence from China listed companies. International Review of Economics & Finance, 67, 225–239.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.01.006
  23. Hołda, M. (2019). Newspaper-based economic uncertainty indices for Poland. NBP Working Paper, 310.
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Imam, P. A., & Temple, J. R. (2024). At the threshold: The increasing relevance of the middle-income trap. IMF Working Paper, 2024/091.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400274855.001
  25. Jasova, E. (2019). The psychological factor of the companies and their effect on the NAIRU and economic cycle in Slovakia. Business & IT, 9(1), 39–52.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14311/bit.2019.01.05
  26. Julio, B., & Yook, Y. (2016). Policy uncertainty, irreversibility, and cross-border flows of capital. Journal of International Economics, 103, 13–26.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.08.004
  27. Katona, A., Birkner, Z., & Péter, E. (2023). Examining digital transformation trends in Austrian and Hungarian companies. Sustainability, 15(15), 11891.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511891
  28. Khojah, M., Ahmed, M., Khan, M. A., Haddad, H., Al-Ramahi, N. M., & Khan, M. A. (2023). Economic policy uncertainty and stock market in G7 Countries: A panel threshold effect perspective. Plos One, 18(7), e0288883.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288883
  29. Kovacs, D., Zulauf, K., Ürkmez, T., Brockhaus, D., & Wagner, R. (2016). Linking entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance in a post-socialist market context: The case of Hungary. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 4(4), 571–589.
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Kulatilaka, N., & Perotti, E. C. (1998). Strategic growth options. Management Science, 44(8), 1021–1031.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.8.1021
  31. Kyaw, K. (2022). Effect of policy uncertainty on environmental innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 363, 132645.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132645
  32. Lee, C. C., Wang, C. W., & Ho, S. J. (2020). Country governance, corruption, and the likelihood of firms’ innovation. Economic Modelling, 92, 326–338.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.01.013
  33. Li, L., Gao, Y., & Wang, X. (2023). Impact of economic policy uncertainty on agribusiness technology innovation: Evidence from 231 listed Firms in China. Sustainability, 15(13), 10037.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310037
  34. Li, X., Hu, Z., & Zhang, Q. (2021). Environmental regulation, economic policy uncertainty, and green technology innovation. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 23, 2975–2988.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02219-4
  35. Liu, J. Y. (2009). Firm size and innovation performance: An empirical study from Chinese Photoelectron Industry. In 2009 international conference on information management, innovation management and industrial engineering, 1. (pp. 145–149). IEEE.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIII.2009.42
  36. Liu, Y., & Gao, Q. (2024). Economic policy uncertainty and enterprise innovation in China: From the perspective of equity financing and financing structure. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 17–33.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.026
  37. Lu, B. C. (2018). To avoid the middle-income trap: The future of innovation in China. Public Policy and Administration, 6(2), 11–18.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.15640/ppar.v6n2a2
  38. Mallinguh, E., & Zeman, Z. (2020). An evaluation of the Fintech companies and the financial sector in Hungary. Economics & Working Capital, 1-2.
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Marcincin, A., & Beblavy, M. (2000). Economic policy in Slovakia 1990-1999. Center for Social and Media analysis. Vienna. Central European University.
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic. Financial Innovation: Center for Financial innovation. Retrieved from https://www.mfsr.sk/en/finance/financial-market/financial-inovation/(26.11.2023).
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Nestoroska, I. (2020). Economic policy uncertainty and firm performance in the Czech Republic. Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, 10(1), 1016.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/2002.101.10.16
  42. Nguyen, B., Schinckus, C., Canh, N. P., & Thanh, S. D. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and entrepreneurship: A bad for a good? Journal of Entrepreneurship, 30(1), 81–133.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971355720974819
  43. Nguyen, Q., & Kim, H. T. (2023). An exploration on policy uncertainty as a driver of R&D activity. Research in International Business and Finance, 64, 101883.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101883
  44. Oblath, G. (2016). Economic policy and macroeconomic developments in Hungary 2010-2015. mBank–CASE Seminar Proceedings, 143. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2847684.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2847684
  45. OECD (2024). OECD Economic Surveys: Slovak Republic 2024. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Ozcelebi, O., & Izgi, M. T. (2023). Assessing the impacts of economic policy uncertainty of the US on the exchange rates and stock returns of Korea, Mexico, Poland and Russia. Eastern European Economics, 61(1), 1–22.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2022.2107937
  47. Peng, X. Y., Zou, X. Y., Zhao, X. X., & Chang, C. P. (2023). How does economic policy uncertainty affect green innovation? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(1), 114–140.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.17760
  48. Qi, Y., Dong, S., Lyu, S., & Yang, S. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty and family firm innovation: Evidence from listed companies in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 901051.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901051
  49. Research, Development, and Innovation Council (2020). Analysis of the existing state of research, development, and innovation in the Czech Republic and a comparison with the situation abroad in 2018. Prague, Czech Republic.
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Roodman (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106
  51. Sargan, J. D. (1958). The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica, 26(3), 393–415.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1907619
  52. Scott, J. W. (2022). Visegrad four political regionalism as a critical reflection of Europeanization: Deciphering the “Illiberal Turn”. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 63(6), 704–725.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2021.1972023
  53. Sena, V., Duygun, M., Lubrano, G., Marra, M., & Shaban, M. (2018). Board independence, corruption and innovation. Some evidence on UK subsidiaries. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 22–43.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.028
  54. Soliman, K. S. (2020). Innovation in the Polish financial sector. In Proceedings of the 35th international Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA), Seville: IBIMA.
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Soukup, M., & Rozmainsky, I. V. (2018). Uncertainty in a transitional economy: The case of the Czech Republic in the 1990s. Terra Economicus, 16(1), 56–73.
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Tabash, M. I., Farooq, U., Ashfaq, K., & Tiwari, A. K. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty and financing structure: A new panel data evidence from selected Asian economies. Research in International Business and Finance, 60, 101574.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101574
  57. Tajaddini, R., & Gholipour, H. F. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty, R&D expenditures and innovation outputs. Journal of Economic Studies, 48(2), 413–427.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-12-2019-0573
  58. US Department of State (2022). 2022 Investment climate statements: Hungary. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-investment-climate-statements/hungary/ (26.11.2023).
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Valášková, K., Gavurová, B., Ďurana, P., & Kováčová, M. (2020). Alter ego only four times? The case study of business profits in the Visegrad Group. E&M Economics and Management, 23(3), 101–119.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2020-3-007
  60. Van Vo, L., & Le, H. T. T. (2017). Strategic growth option, uncertainty, and R&D investment. International Review of Financial Analysis, 51, 16–24.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.03.002
  61. Virág, B. (2018). Crisis management and economic policy shifts in Hungary after 2010. In Structural reforms for growth and cohesion: Lessons and Challenges for CESEE (pp. 142–156). Edward Elgar Publishing.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788971140.00019
  62. Vondrová, A., & Valach, M. (2014). Forming of economic policy of Slovakia using alternative measurements. Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business & Economics, 2014(1), 1–8. 10.5171/2014.678277.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5171/2014.678277
  63. Wang, B., Khalid, S., & Mahmood, H. (2024). R&D spending and economic policy uncertainty in Asian countries: An advanced panel data estimation study. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 4710–4729,
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01285-x
  64. Wen, J., Deng, P., Zhang, Q., & Chang, C. P. (2021). Is higher government efficiency bringing about higher innovation? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(3), 626–655.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.14269
  65. William, M., & Fengrong, W. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty and industry innovation: Cross country evidence. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 84, 208–228.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2022.01.012
  66. Xu, S., Qamruzzaman, M., & Adow, A. H. (2021). Is financial innovation bestowed or a curse for economic sustainably: The mediating role of economic policy uncertainty. Sustainability, 13(4), 2391.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042391
  67. Zachová., A. (2023). Study: Czech economy falls into middle-income trap. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/study-czech-economy-falls-into-middle-income-trap/ (11.09.2024).
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Zybała, A. (2019). Board-level employee representation in the Visegrad countries. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 25(3), 261–273.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680119830572

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 506

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.