Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

SMEs sustainability: The role of human resource management, corporate social responsibility and financial management

Abstract

Research background: The sustainability of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) represents a significant scientific and professional problem in the current turbulent period because these enterprises play an important role in any country’s economic and social systems.

Purpose of the article: This paper aimed to define the significant sustainability factors of small and medium-sized enterprises and to quantify their impact and importance on the sustainability of SMEs. The areas of Human Resource Management, Corporate Social Responsibility, and financial management were defined as significant sustainability factors.

Methods: Empirical research, on which the scientific hypotheses were formulated and evaluated, was conducted in June 2022 in V4 countries (Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Poland, and Hungary) using a structured questionnaire. The study accumulated a sample of 1398 respondents. Data collection was conducted through an external agency, MN FORCE, operating in Central European countries. The Computer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) method was used to record respondents’ perceptions. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and linear regression analysis were used to evaluate the hypotheses.

Findings & value added: The research showed that all defined factors in the areas of Human resource management (HRM), Corporate social responsibility (CSR), and financial management of the firm had an impact on defined sustainability attributes. The greatest impact was found on the firm’s financial management, followed by CSR and HRM. The empirical results confirm that the intensity of the independent variables varies across the V4 countries. These results also show that the intensity of the selected HRM, CSR, and financial management factors of a firm is higher in the integrated models than in the models for individual V4 countries. The research results have shown that a range of factors determine the right attitude towards the sustainability of companies. In this context, economic policymakers and entrepreneurs must perceive sustainable growth as complex and apply a systemic approach to its design and implementation.

Keywords

financial management, human resource management, corporate social responsibility, SMEs, sustainability

PDF

References

  1. Ahmed, M., Mubarik, M. S., & Shahbaz, M. (2021). Factors affecting the outcome of corporate sustainability policy: A review paper. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(9), 10335–10356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12143-7
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Al Qershi, N., A., Diah, M .L. B. M., Latiffi, A .B. A., & Ahmad, W. N. K. W. (2020). Strategic innovation and competitive advantage of manufacturing SMEs: The mediating role of human capital. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 24(3), 70–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v24i3.1493
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Almarzooqi, A. H., Khan, M., & Khalid, K. (2019). The role of sustainable HRM in sustaining positive organisational outcomes: An interactional framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(7), 1272–1292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2018-0165
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Al-Nimer, M., Abbadi, S. S., Al-Omush, A., & Ahmad, H. (2021). Risk management practices and firm performance with a mediating role of business model innovation. Observations from Jordan. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14, 113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14030113
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Alsafadi, Y., & Altahat, S. (2021). Human resource management practices and employee performance: The role of job satisfaction. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 519–529.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Antonio, S., Felice, P., & Anastasia, G. (2018). Does sustainability foster the cost of equity reduction? The relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and riskiness worldwide. African Journal of Business Management, 12(12), 381–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM2018.8562
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Apospori, E. (2018). Regional CSR policies and SMEs’ CSR actions: Mind the gap -the case of the tourism SMEs in Crete. Sustainability, 10, 2197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072197
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B., Momtaz, P. P., Motuzenko, H., & Vismara, S. (2023). The economic costs of the Russia-Ukraine war: A synthetic control study of (lost) entrepreneurship. SSRN Electronic Journal, 23529(2), 1–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4378827
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Ayadi, R., Abid, I., & Guesmi, K. (2021). Survival of reorganized firms in France. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101434
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Azar, J., Duro, M., Kadach, I., & Ormazabal, G. (2021). The Big Three and corporate carbon emissions around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 674–696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.007
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Baglibel, M., Samancioglu, M., & Crow, G. M. (2018). Factors affecting the sustainability of educational changes: A mixed method research. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1502395
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Balcerzak, A. P., & MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2020). Projection of SDGs in codes of ethics-case study about lost in translation. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040095
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Balcerzak, A. P., MacGregor, R. K., MacGregor Pelikánová, R., Rogalska, E., & Szostek, D. (2023). The EU regulation of sustainable investment: The end of sustainability trade-offs? Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(1), 199–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110111
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Balcerzak, A. P., Zinecker, M., Skalický, R., Rogalska, E., & Doubravský, K. (2023b). Technology-oriented start-ups and valuation: A novel approach based on specific contract terms. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 197, 122876, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122876
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Belas, J., & Rahman, A. (2023). Financial management of the company. Are there differences of opinion between owners and managers in the SME segment? Journal of Business Sectors, 1(1), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62222/UQAH6943
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Belas, J., Dvorský, J., Kubálek, J., & Smrčka, L. (2018). Important factors of financial risk in the SME segment. Journal of International Studies, 11(1), 80–92. https://doi. org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-1/6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-1/6
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Belas, J., Škare, M., Gavurova, B., Dvorsky, J., & Kotaskova, A. (2022). The impact of ethical and CSR factors on engineers’ attitudes towards SMEs sustainability. Journal of Business Research, 149, 589–598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.056
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Belas, J., Strnad, Z., Gavurova, B., & Cepel, M. (2019). Business environment quality factors research-SME management´s platform. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 64–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.20.1.06
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Betakova, J., Pietrzak, M. B., & Iglinski, B. (2023). Effect of demographic characteristics of enterprises on the implementation of corporate social responsibility in SMEs context. Journal of Business Sectors, 1(1), 53–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62222/XQKO8567
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Bodhanwala, S., & Bodhanwala, R. (2018). Does corporate sustainability impact firm profitability? Evidence from India. Management Decision, 56(8), 1734–1747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2017-0381
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Boiral, O., Ebrahimi, M., Kuyken, K., & Talbot, D. (2019). Greening remote SMEs: The case of small regional airports. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(3), 813–827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3447-0
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Buljubasic Musanovic, E., & Halilbegovic, S. (2021). Financial statement manipulation in failing small and medium-sized enterprises in Bosnia and Hercegovina. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 8(1), 556–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i4.692
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Castro-González, S., Bande, B., & Vila-Vázquez, G. (2021). How can companies decrease salesperson turnover intention? The corporate social responsibility intervention. Sustainability 13, 750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020750
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Cehajic, A., & Košak, M. (2021). Bank lending and small and medium-sized enterprises’ access to finance – Effects of macroprudential policies. Journal of International Money and Finance, 124, 102612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102612
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Chakabva, O., Robertson T., & Dubihlela, J. (2021). Factors inhibiting effective risk management in emerging market SMEs. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14, 231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14060231
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Chen, J., Xie, X., Liu, J., & Liu, R. (2020). Externality, product differentiation and social welfare in the education market. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19(51C), 522–541.
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Chiu, I. H. Y., Lin, L., & Rouch, D. (2022). Law and regulation for sustainable finance. European Business Organization Law Review, 23(1), 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-021-00230-2
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Crovini, C., Ossola, G., & Britzelmaier, B. (2020). How to reconsider risk management in SMEs? An advanced, reasoned and organised literature review. European Management Journal, 39(1), 118–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.11.002
    View in Google Scholar
  29. de Oliveira, U. R., Menezes, R. P., & Fernandes, V. A. (2023). A systematic literature review on corporate sustainability: Contributions, barriers, innovations and future possibilities. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 3045–3079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02933-7
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Dunn, K. M., de Vet, H. C. W., Hooper, H., Ong, B. N., & Croft, P. R. (2006). Measurement of back pain episode inception in questionnaires: A study combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Journal of Musculoskelet Pain, 14(1), 29–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J094v14n01_05
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Dvorský, J., Bednarz, J., & Blajer-Gołębiewska, A. (2023a). The impact of corporate reputation and social media engagement on the sustainability of SMEs: Perceptions of top managers and the owners. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(3), 779–811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.025
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Dvorský, J., Belas, J., Gavurova, B., & Brabenec, T. (2020). Business risk management in the context of small and medium-sized enterprises. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 1690–1708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1844588
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Dvorský, J., Švihlíková, I., Kozubíková, L., Frajtova Michalíková, K., & Balcerzak, A. P. (2023b). Effect of CSR implementation and crisis events in business on the financial management of SMEs. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(5), 1496–1519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2023.19821
    View in Google Scholar
  34. European Parliament (2022). Economic repercussions of Russia' s war on Ukraine – Weekly Digest, Economic Governance Support Unit (EGOV) Directorate-General for Internal Policies.
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Fahad, S., Alnori, F., Su, F., & Deng, J. (2022). Adoption of green innovation practices in SMEs sector: Evidence from an emerging economy. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 35(1), 5486–5501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2029713
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Feng, Y., Akram, R., Hieu, V. M., & Tien, N. H. (2022). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the sustainable financial performance of Italian firms: Mediating role of firm reputation. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 35(1), 4740–4758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.2017318
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Ferreira de Araújo Lima, P., Crema, M., & Verbano, C. (2020). Risk management in SMEs: A systematic literature review and future directions. European Management Journal, 38(1), 78–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.005
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Fiszeder, P., & Małecka, M. (2022). Forecasting volatility during the outbreak of Russian invasion of Ukraine: Application to commodities, stock indices, currencies, and cryptocurrencies. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17(4), 939–967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.032
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Schaltegger, S. (2020). A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 3–18. doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Gallo, P., Kusnirova, R., Vachal, J., Strakova, J., & Rauser, D. (2023). Application of BSC and EFQM models in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Sectors, 1(1), 20–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62222/EQEW7654
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Gangi, F., Meles, A., Monferrà, S., & Mustilli, M. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility help the survivorship of SMEs and large firms? Global Finance Journal, 43, 100402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2018.01.006
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Graafland, J., & Noorderhaven, N. (2020). Technological competition, innovation motive and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from top managers of European SMEs. Economist (Netherlands), 168(1), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-019-09351-z
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Grimstad, S. M. F., Glavee-Geo, R., & Fjørtoft, B. E. (2020). SMEs motivations for CSR: An exploratory study. European Business Review, 32(4), 553–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-01-2019-0014
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Gu, Y., Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2023). Audit 4.0-based ESG assurance: An example of using satellite images on GHG emissions. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 50, 100625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2023.100625
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Haque, F., & Ntim, C. G. (2018). Environmental policy, sustainable development, governance mechanisms and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(3), 415–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2007
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Helfaya, A., & Moussa, T. (2017). Do board's corporate social responsibility strategy and orientation influence environmental sustainability disclosure? UK evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1061–1077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1960
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Hermundsdottir, F., & Aspelund, A. (2021). Sustainability innovations and firm competitiveness: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124715
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Huang, Y. (2021). Technology innovation and sustainability: Challenges and research needs. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 23(6), 1663–1664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02152-6
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Hudáková, M., Kardoš, P., Dvorský, J., Afful, C. R. & Kloudova, J. (2023). Management of operational risk in the context of financial performance of SMEs. Systems, 11, 408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11080408
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Hudakova, M., Masar, M., Luskova, M., & Patak, M. R. (2018). The dependence of perceived business risks on the size of SMEs. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(4), 54–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2018.04.04
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Husgafvel, R., Pajunen, N., Dahl, O., Heiskanen, K., Ekroos, A., & Virtanen, K. (2017). Development of environmental and economic sustainability metrics for the metal production industry - experiences from university-industry. Sustainable Business, Management, and Economics, 2, 98–122.
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Jagoda, A., Kolakowski, T., Marcinkowski, J., Cheba, K., & Hajdas, M. (2023). E-customer preferences on sustainable last mile deliveries in the e-commerce market: A cross-generational perspective. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(3), 853–882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.027
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Juergensen, J., Guimón, J., & Narula, R. (2020). European SMEs amidst the COVID-19 crisis: Assessing impact and policy responses. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 47(3), 499–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-020-00169-4
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Gourinchas, P.-O., Penciakova, V., & Sander, N. (2020). COVID-19 and SME failures. IMF Working Papers, 207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513557748.001
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Khan, K. A., Akhtar, M. A., Vishwakarma, R. K., & Hoang, H. C. (2023). A sectoral perspective on the sustainable growth of SMEs. Empirical research in the V4 countries. Journal of Business Sectors, 1(1), 10–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62222/CVFW6962
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Khan, Y. K., Kasuma, J., & Azrin, A. (2022). The challenges of small and medium businesses in managing human capital towards SMEs performance - A qualitative study. Asian Journal of Economics Business and Accounting 15(1), 311–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol15no1.10
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Kiba-Janiak, M., Cheba, K., Mucowska, M., & de Oliveira, L. K. (2022). Segmentation of e-customers in terms of sustainable last-mile delivery. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 1117–1142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.032
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Kim, J., Choi, D., Cho, E., Okafor, C. E., & Park, B. Il. (2022). Corporate sustainability in the wake of the COVID-19 global pandemic: Does CSR enhance corporate survival during a market crisis? Sustainability, 14(21), 14438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114438
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Kim, S. S. (2021). Sustainable growth variables by industry sectors and their influence on changes in business models of SMEs in the era of digital transformation. Sustainability, 13, 7114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137114
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Kozubikova, L., Kubalek, J., Rowland, Z., & Palcak, L. (2023). The significant factors of sustainability of SME in the V4 Countries. Transformations in Business & Economics, 22(1), 98–114.
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Kramar, R. (2022). Sustainable human resource management: Six defining characteristics. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 60(1), 146–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12321
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Krüger, N. A., & Meyer, N. (2021). The development of a small and medium-sized business risk management intervention tool. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14, 310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14070310
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Lašáková, A., Remišová, A., & Abratzky, D. V. (2022). Ethics programs in business and management literature: Bibliometric analysis of performance, content, and trends. Ethics & Bioeethics (in Central Europe), 12 (1-2), 92–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2022-0001
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Liu, H., Kim, S. J., Wang, H., & Kim, K. H. (2020). Corporate sustainability management under market uncertainty. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(5), 1023–1037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-03-2019-0131
    View in Google Scholar
  65. MacGregor Pelikánová, R., & Sani, M. (2023). Luxury, slow and fast fashion: A case study on the (un)sustainable creating of shared values. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(3), 813–851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.026
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Malesios, C., De, D., Moursellas, A., Dey, P. K., & Evangelinos, K. (2021). Sustainability performance analysis of small and medium sized enterprises: Criteria, methods and Framework. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 75, 100993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100993
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Małys, Ł. (2023). The approach to supply chain cooperation in the implementation of sustainable development initiatives and company’s economic performance. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(1), 255–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.008
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Matinaro, V., Liu, Y., Lee, T. R., & Poesche, J. (2019). Extracting key factors for sustainable development of enterprises: Case study of SMEs in Taiwan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 1152–1169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.280
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Mizickova, J., Levicky, M., & Papcunova, V. (2022). Perception of barriers to cross-border cooperation between Slovakia and Poland in the context of small and medium-sized enterprises. Auspicia, 2, 22–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36682/a_2022_2_2
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Musa, H., Krištofík, P., Medzihorský, J., & Klieštik, T. (2024). The development of firm size distribution–Evidence from four Central European countries. International Review of Economics & Finance, 91, 98–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.12.003
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Nielsen, H., & Villadsen, K. (2023). The ESG discourse is neither timeless nor stable: How Danish Companies ‘tactically’ embrace ESG concepts. Sustainability, 15, 2766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032766
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Oliinyk, O., Mishchuk, H., Vasa, L., & Kozma, K. (2023). Social responsibility: Opportunities for integral assessment and analysis of connections with business innovation. Sustainability, 15(6), 5608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065608
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Owusu, J., Ansah, W. O., Djan, K. O., & Anin, E. K. (2021). Impact of financial resource building effort on financial resource availability among small and medium enterprises, Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1920676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1920676
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Papagiannidis, S., & Marikyan, D. (2022). Environmental sustainability: A technology acceptance perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102445
    View in Google Scholar
  75. Podgorodnichenko, N., Edgar, F., & McAndrew, I. (2020). The role of HRM in developing sustainable organisations: Contemporary challenges and contradictions. Human Resource Management Review, 30(3), 100685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.04.001
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Potkany M., Stasiak-Betlejewska R., Kováč R., & Gejdoš M. (2016). Outsourcing in conditions of SMEs - the potential for cost savings. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 13(1), 145–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2016.13.1.14
    View in Google Scholar
  77. Potkány, M., Kamodyová, P., Stasiak-Betlejewska, R., & Lesníková, P. (2021). Nature and potential barriers of facility management in manufacturing enterprises. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(1), 327–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.1.20
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Qing, C., & Jin, S. (2022). How does corporate social responsibility affect sustainability of social enterprises in Korea? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859170
    View in Google Scholar
  79. Rajnoha, R., Lesníková, P., & Vahančík, J. (2021). Sustainable economic development: The relation between economic growth and quality of life in V4 and Austria. Economics and Sociology, 14(3), 341–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2021/14-3/18
    View in Google Scholar
  80. Ramos-González, M. del M., Rubio-Andrés, M., & Sastre-Castillo, M. Á. (2022). Effects of socially responsible human resource management (SR-HRM) on innovation and reputation in entrepreneurial SMEs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(3), 1205–1233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00720-8
    View in Google Scholar
  81. Rashiti, M., & Skenderi, N. (2023). Impact of corporate social responsibility as competitive factor on small and medium businesses in Kosovo. QUALITY- Access to Success, 24(192), 261–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/24.192.30
    View in Google Scholar
  82. Remišová, A., & Lašáková, A. (2020). Unethical practices in the Slovak business environment: Entrepreneurs vs. the state? Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 10(1-2), 78–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2020-0002
    View in Google Scholar
  83. Ruiz-Palomo, D., Fernández-Gámez, M.A., & León-Gómez, A. (2022). Analyzing the effect of financial constraints on technological and management innovation in SMEs: A gender perspective. SAGE Open, 12(1), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079925
    View in Google Scholar
  84. Saci, K., & Mansour, W. (2023). Risk sharing, SMEs’ financial strategy, and lending guarantee technology. Risk, 11(2), 33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11020033
    View in Google Scholar
  85. Saks, A. M. (2022). Caring human resources management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100835
    View in Google Scholar
  86. Santhosh, CH. (2021). Firm age, sales growth and survival of internationalized SMEs: Does human capital play a role? Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 39(4), 1180–1194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-09-2020-0168
    View in Google Scholar
  87. Šebestová, J., & Sroka, W. (2020). Sustainable development goals and SME decisions: The Czech republic vs Poland. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 7(1), 39–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v7i1.418
    View in Google Scholar
  88. Semenikhina, V., Pochtovyuk, A., & Onyshchenko, O. (2023). Social and environmental components of social responsibility of industrial companies in the conditions of a digital and sustainability economy. Auspicia, 2023(1), 18–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36682/a_2023_1_2
    View in Google Scholar
  89. Silvestre, B. S., & Ţîrcă, D. M. (2019). Innovations for sustainable development: Moving toward a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 325–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.244
    View in Google Scholar
  90. Singh, S. K., Giudice, M. Del, Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020). Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119762
    View in Google Scholar
  91. Ślusarczyk, M., & Grondys, S. (2019). Parametric conditions of high financial risk in the SME sector. Risks, 7(3), 84–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks7030084
    View in Google Scholar
  92. Stoian, C., & Gilman, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility that “pays”: A strategic approach to CSR for SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), 5–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12224
    View in Google Scholar
  93. Stoiljkovic, A., Tomic, S., & Uzelac, O. (2021). Does capital structure affect the differences in the financial performance of small enterprises? Strategic Management, 26(3), 72–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/StraMan2103072S
    View in Google Scholar
  94. Syrová, L., & Špička, J. (2023). Exploring the indirect links between enterprise risk management and the financial performance of SMEs. Risk Management, 25, 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41283-022-00107-9
    View in Google Scholar
  95. Tasdemir, C., & Gazo, R. (2018). A systematic literature review for better understanding of lean driven sustainability. Sustainability, 10(7), 2544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072544
    View in Google Scholar
  96. Tennakoon, W. D. N. S. M., & Janadari, M. P. N. (2022). Measuring economic sustainability: Are we doing it right? Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 21–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/sljssh.v2i1.53
    View in Google Scholar
  97. Tilt, C. A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility research: The importance of context. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0003-7
    View in Google Scholar
  98. Tounés, A., Tornikoski, E. T., & Gribaa, F. (2019). The formation of environmentally friendly intentions of SME owner-managers in an emerging country: The case of Tunisian's textile-clothing industry. Organization & Environment, 32(4), 528–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026618764267
    View in Google Scholar
  99. Tur-Porcar, A., Roig-Tierno, N., & Mestre, A. L. (2018). Factors affecting entrepreneurship and business sustainability. Sustainability, 10(2), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020452
    View in Google Scholar
  100. Vărzaru, A. A., Bocean, C. G., & Nicolescu, M. M. (2021). Rethinking corporate responsibility and sustainability in light of economic performance. Sustainability, 13(5), 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052660
    View in Google Scholar
  101. Vo, H. D., Van, T. H. L., Dinh, T. H. L., & Ho, M. C. (2020). Financial inclusion, corporate social responsibility and customer loyalty in the banking sector in Vietnam. Journal of International Studies, 13(4), 9–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-4/1
    View in Google Scholar
  102. Wall P. W. (2021). Determinants of SMEs performance - from business strategy to innovation. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(2), 537–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.32
    View in Google Scholar
  103. Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224
    View in Google Scholar
  104. Yang, J., & Liu, X. (2023). The role of sustainable development goals, financial knowledge and investment strategies on the organisational profitability: Moderating impact of government support. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 36(1), 1570–1591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2090405
    View in Google Scholar
  105. Yeganeh, H. (2020). A critical examination of the social impacts of large multinational corporations in the age of globalisation. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 16(3), 193–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-01-2019-0001
    View in Google Scholar
  106. Yousaf, Z., Mădălina, B., Mihai, D., Maria-Luiza, H., Cristina, Ștefan M., & Constantin, P. (2022). Pollution reduction as catalyst between environmental resources conservation efforts and sustainable development: Investigation of energy firms in circular economy. Energies, 15(17), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176410
    View in Google Scholar
  107. Zimmer, K., Fröhling, M., & F. Schultmann (2016). Sustainable supplier management – a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. International Journal of Production Research, 54(5), 14121442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340
    View in Google Scholar
  108. Zvarikova, K., Barinova, D., Belas. J., & Palcak, L. (2023). Empirical research on business ethics of SMEs in the V4 countries. Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 13 (1-2), 51–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2023-0007
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 314

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)