Digital transformation, human capital upgrading, and enterprise ESG performance: Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises

Abstract

Research background: With the rapid development of digital technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), big data, cloud computing, and blockchain, the deep integration of digital technology and traditional industries offers unprecedented opportunities and has become an important technological force driving the development of enterprise environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. Digital transformation increases the complementarity between the production and operation processes of enterprises and highly skilled labour, specifically manifested in the adaptive change of the human capital structure of enterprises in labour relations. Meanwhile, transforming enterprises’ human capital structure also affects ESG performance.

Purpose of the article: This study investigates the effects of digital transformation on enterprise ESG performance and its underlying mechanisms of human capital upgrading. First, it combines cutting-edge literature to analyse the theoretical mechanism between digital transformation, human capital upgrading, and enterprise ESG performance, revealing the internal driving factors and implementation paths for improving enterprise ESG performance. Second, we use the data of 3928 listed enterprises in the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets from 2009–2022 to analyse the impact of digital transformation on enterprise ESG performance from the perspective of human capital upgrading as well as the mechanism by which digital transformation affects enterprise ESG performance through human capital upgrading. Third, we provide policy recommendations for optimising the labour structure and enhancing enterprise ESG performance from the perspective of optimising human capital and digital technology applications.

Methods: Based on data from 3928 listed enterprises in Chinese A-share markets from 2009-2022, we investigate the effects of digital transformation on enterprise ESG performance and the mechanisms of human capital upgrading. The panel mediation effect model tests the relationships between digital transformation, human capital upgrading, and enterprise ESG performance.

Findings & value added: In theory, digital transformation is beneficial for optimising human capital structure, accelerating green technological innovation, and improving management efficiency, thus improving enterprise ESG performance. Mechanism testing shows that digital transformation enhances enterprise ESG performance through human capital upgrading. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact of digital transformation on ESG performance is more significant in enterprises that are capital- and technical-intensive, and located in the eastern and central regions. This study examines the microeconomic consequences of digital transformation, contributing to a deeper understanding of the theoretical logic inherent in enterprises’ optimisation of their labour structure. It also provides empirical evidence and decision support for developing industrial talent policies.

Keywords

ESG, digital transformation, human capital, digital economy

References

1. Afolabi, J. A. (2023). Advancing digital economy in Africa: The role of critical enablers. Technology in Society, 75, 102367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102367
   View in Google Scholar
2. Aldashev, A., & Batkeyev, B. (2021). Broadband infrastructure and economic growth in rural areas. Information Economics and Policy, 57, 100936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100936
   View in Google Scholar
3. Alex, O. A., Eric, E. O. O., Janet, D., & Nana, K. K. (2022). Enhancing human development in developing regions: Do ICT and transport infrastructure matter?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121725
   View in Google Scholar
4. Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 1027–1047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8
   View in Google Scholar
5. Bae, K. H., El Ghoul, S., Gong, Z. J., & Guedhami, O. (2021). Does CSR matter in times of crisis? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, 101876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101876
   View in Google Scholar
6. Baker, E. D., Boulton, T. J., Braga-Alves, M. V., & Morey, M. R. (2021). ESG government risk and international IPO underpricing. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, 101913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101913
   View in Google Scholar
7. Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, E., Brooks, R., & Do, H. X., (2023). ESG and firm performance: The role of size and media channels. Economic Modelling, 121, 106203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106203
   View in Google Scholar
8. Boulhaga, M., Bouri, A., Elamer, A. A., & Ibrahim, B. A. (2022). Environmental, social and governance ratings and firm performance: The moderating role of internal control quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 303(1), 134–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2343
   View in Google Scholar
9. Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
   View in Google Scholar
10. Brynjolfsson, E., & McElheran, K. (2016). The rapid adoption of data-driven decision-making. American Economic Review, 106(5), 133–39.
    View in Google Scholar
11. Cai, C., Tu, Y. Q., & Li, Z. (2023). Enterprise digital transformation and ESG performance. Finance Research Letters, 58(Part D), 104692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104692
    View in Google Scholar
12. Cambrea, D. R., Paolone, F., & Cucari, N. (2023). Advisory or monitoring role in ESG scenario: Which women directors are more influential in the Italian context?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4299–4314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3366
    View in Google Scholar
13. Campbell, B. A., Coff, R., & Kryscynski, D. (2012). Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 375–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0276
    View in Google Scholar
14. Chen, H. S., & Tian, Z. (2022). Environmental uncertainty, resource orchestration and digital transformation: A fuzzy-set QCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 139, 184–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.048
    View in Google Scholar
15. Christensen, D. M., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2022). Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. Accounting Review, 97(1), 147–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0506
    View in Google Scholar
16. Cong, L. W., & He, Z. (2019). Blockchain disruption and smart contracts. Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1754–1797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz007
    View in Google Scholar
17. Corbett, C. J. (2018). How sustainable is big data?. Production and Operations Management, 27(9), 1685–1695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12837
    View in Google Scholar
18. Czernich, N., Falck, O., Kretschmer, T., & Woessmann, L. (2011). Broadband infrastructure and economic growth. Economic Journal, 121(552), 505–532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02420.x
    View in Google Scholar
19. de Clercq, M., D’ Haese, M., & Buysse, J. (2023). Economic growth and broadband access: The European urban-rural digital divide. Telecommunications Policy, 47(6), 102579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102579
    View in Google Scholar
20. Ding, X. A., Sheng, Z. L., Appolloni, A., Shahzad, M., & Han, S. J. (2024a). Digital transformation, ESG practice, and total factor productivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4547–4561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3718
    View in Google Scholar
21. Ding, Y. Y., Shi, Z. Y., Xi, R. C., Diao, Y. X., & Hu, Y. (2024b). Digital transformation, productive services agglomeration and innovation performance. Heliyon, 10(3), e25534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25534
    View in Google Scholar
22. Dou, B., Guo, S. L., Chang, X. C., & Wang, Y. (2023). Corporate digital transformation and labor structure upgrading. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90, 102904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102904
    View in Google Scholar
23. Du, X., Weng, J., Zeng, Q., Chang, Y., & Pei, H. (2017). Do lenders applaud corporate environmental performance? Evidence from Chinese private-owned firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 179–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2758-2
    View in Google Scholar
24. Erik, B., & McElheran, K. (2016). The rapid adoption of data-driven decision-making. American Economic Review, 106(5), 133–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161016
    View in Google Scholar
25. Fang, M., Nie, H., & Shen, X. (2023). Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance?. Economic Modelling, 118, 106101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106101
    View in Google Scholar
26. Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61(11), 2549–2568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038
    View in Google Scholar
27. Ford. G. S. (2018). Is faster better? Quantifying the relationship between broadband speed and economic growth. Telecommunications Policy, 42(9), 766–777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.05.006
    View in Google Scholar
28. Fu, Q., Zhao, X., & Chang, C.-P. (2023). Does ESG performance bring to enterprises’ green innovation? Yes, evidence from 118 countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(3), 795–832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.024
    View in Google Scholar
29. Gangi, F., Varrone, N., Daniele, M. L., & Coscia, M. (2022). Mainstreaming socially responsible investment: Do environmental, social and governance ratings of investment funds converge?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 353, 131684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131684
    View in Google Scholar
30. Garcia, A. S., & Orsato, R. J. (2020). Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: A study about environmental, social, governance, and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3261–3272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2570
    View in Google Scholar
31. Ghosh, S., Hughes, M., Hodgkinson, I., & Hughes, P. (2022). Digital transformation of industrial businesses: A dynamic capability approach. Technovation, 113, 102414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102414
    View in Google Scholar
32. Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., & Kim, Y. (2017). Country-level institutions, firm value, and the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 360–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.4
    View in Google Scholar
33. Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Digital economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 3–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171452
    View in Google Scholar
34. Guo, X. C., Li, M. M., Wang, Y. L., & Mardani, A. (2023). Does digital transformation improve the firm’s performance? From the perspective of digitalization paradox and managerial myopia. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113868
    View in Google Scholar
35. Haller, S. A., & Lyons, S. (2015). Broadband adoption and firm productivity: Evidence from Irish manufacturing firms. Telecommunications Policy, 39(1), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.10.003
    View in Google Scholar
36. He, X. W., & Chen, W. (2024). Digital transformation and environmental, social, and governance performance from a human capital perspective. Sustainability, 16(11), 4737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114737
    View in Google Scholar
37. He, X., Jing, Q., & Chen, H. (2023). The impact of environmental tax laws on heavy-polluting enterprise ESG performance: A stakeholder behavior perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 344, 118578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118578
    View in Google Scholar
38. Houston, J. F., & Shan, H. Y. (2022). Corporate ESG profiles and banking relationships. Review of Financial Studies, 35(7), 3373–3417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhab125
    View in Google Scholar
39. Jiang, K., Du, X., & Chen, Z. (2022). Firms’ digitalization and stock price crash risk. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82, 102196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102196
    View in Google Scholar
40. Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Patel, P. C., & Gebauer, H. (2020). The relationship between digitalization and servitization: The role of servitization in capturing the financial potential of digitalization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119804
    View in Google Scholar
41. Li, L. X. (2022a). Digital transformation and sustainable performance: The moderating role of market turbulence. Industrial Marketing Management, 104, 28–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.04.007
    View in Google Scholar
42. Li, Q., Chen, H. M., Chen, Y., Xiao, T., & Wang, L. (2023). Digital economy, financing constraints, and corporate innovation. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 80, 102081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102081
    View in Google Scholar
43. Li, Y. J. (2022b). Enterprise digital transformation and enterprise value. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 11(08), 5986-5993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2022.118631
    View in Google Scholar
44. Lin, J. B., Mao, & M. Y. (2023). How does digital transformation affect sustainable innovation performance? The pivotal roles of digital technology-business alignment and environmental uncertainty. Sustainable Development, 32(4), 3163–3181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2830
    View in Google Scholar
45. Lin, Y., Yin, H. T., Wen, J., & Chang, C. P. (2024). Assessing the impact of religion on environmental quality. Economic Systems, 48(1), 101164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101164
    View in Google Scholar
46. Liu, S., Wu, Y. T., Yin, X. B., & Wu, B. (2023). Digital transformation and labour investment efficiency: Heterogeneity across the enterprise life cycle. Finance Research Letters, 58(Part C), 104537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104537
    View in Google Scholar
47. McBrayer, G. A. (2018). Does persistence explain ESG disclosure decisions?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1074–1086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1521
    View in Google Scholar
48. Mwananziche, J., Myovella, G., Karacuka, M., Haucap, J., & Moshi, G. (2023). Is digitalization a booster for economic growth in Africa? Short run and long run evidence from Tanzania. Telecommunications Policy, 47(10), 102679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102679
    View in Google Scholar
49. Nguyen, D. K., Broekhuizen, T., Dong, J. Q., & Verhoef, P. C. (2023). Leveraging synergy to drive digital transformation: A systems-theoretic perspective. Information & Management, 60(7), 103836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103836
    View in Google Scholar
50. Niu, Y. H., Wen, W., Wang, S., & Li, S. F. (2023). Breaking barriers to innovation: The power of digital transformation. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103457
    View in Google Scholar
51. Paiola, M., & Gebauer, H. (2020). Internet of things technologies, digital servitization and business model innovation in B to B manufacturing firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 245–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.03.009
    View in Google Scholar
52. Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 572–597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001
    View in Google Scholar
53. Popkova, E. G., Bernardi, P. D., Tyurina, Y. G., & Sergi, B. S. (2022). A theory of digital technology advancement to address the grand challenges of sustainable development. Technology in Society, 68, 101831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101831
    View in Google Scholar
54. Qian, K., Shi, B., Song, Y., & Wu, H. (2023). ESG performance and loan contracting in an emerging market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 78, 101973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.101973
    View in Google Scholar
55. Rachinger, M., Rauter, R., Müller, C., Vorraber, W., & Schirgi, E. (2018). Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(8), 1143–1160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0020
    View in Google Scholar
56. Ren, X., Zeng, G., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Digital finance and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, 102019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102019
    View in Google Scholar
57. Riedl, A., & Smeets, P. (2017). Why do investors hold socially responsible mutual funds?. Journal of Finance, 72(6), 2505–2550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12547
    View in Google Scholar
58. Saldanha, T., Mithas, S., & Krishnan, M. S. (2017). Leveraging customer involvement for fueling innovation: The role of relational and analytical information processing capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 267–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.14
    View in Google Scholar
59. Singh, S., Sharma, M., & Sanjay D. (2021). Modeling the effects of digital transformation in Indian manufacturing industry. Technology in Society, 67, 101763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101763
    View in Google Scholar
60. Sun, C., Zhang, Z., Vochozka, M., & Vozňáková, I. (2022). Enterprise digital transformation and debt financing cost in China’s A-share listed companies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(3), 783–829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.023
    View in Google Scholar
61. Troise, C., Corvello, V., Ghobadian, A., & O’ Regan, N. (2022). How can SMEs successfully navigate VUCA environment: The role of agility in the digital transformation era. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121227
    View in Google Scholar
62. Uyar, A., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2022). ESG performance and CSR awards: Does consistency matter?. Finance Research Letters, 50, 103276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103276
    View in Google Scholar
63. Vu, D. A., Nguyen, T. V., Nhu, Q. M., & Tran, T. Q. (2024). Does increased digital transformation promote a firm’s financial performance? New insights from the quantile approach. Finance Research Letters, 64, 105430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105430
    View in Google Scholar
64. Wang, H. J., Jiao, S. P., Bu, K., Wang, Y. B., & Wang, Y. X. (2023). Digital transformation and manufacturing companies’ ESG responsibility performance. Finance Research Letters, 58(Part B), 104370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104370
    View in Google Scholar
65. Wang, J. X., Yuan, X., Huang, X., Liu, C. X., & Zhang, P. D. (2024). Can digitalization facilitate cross-border M&A? Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies. Research in International Business and Finance, 67(Part A) 102118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102118
    View in Google Scholar
66. Wang, L. (2023). Digital transformation and total factor productivity. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104338
    View in Google Scholar
67. Wang, S. F., & Esperança, J.P. (2023). Can digital transformation improve market and ESG performance? Evidence from Chinese SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 419, 137980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137980
    View in Google Scholar
68. Wang, Y. Z., & He, P. Z. (2024). Enterprise digital transformation, financial information disclosure and innovation efficiency. Finance Research Letters, 59, 104707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104707
    View in Google Scholar
69. Wen, Z. L., Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Wu, Y., Liu, H. Y., & Morin, A. J. S. (2014). Interaction effects in latent growth models: Evaluation of alternative estimation approaches. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 361–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915205
    View in Google Scholar
70. Wu, K., Fu, Y., & Kong, D. (2022). Does the digital transformation of enterprises affect stock price crash risk?. Finance Research Letters, 48, 45–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102888
    View in Google Scholar
71. Wu, Y. L., & Huang, S. L. (2022). The effects of digital finance and financial constraint on financial performance: Firm-level evidence from China’s new energy enterprises. Energy Economics, 112, 106158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106158
    View in Google Scholar
72. Yu, E. P., Guo, C. Q., & Luu, B. V. (2018). Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 987–1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2047
    View in Google Scholar
73. Zhai, S., & Liu, Z. (2023). Artificial intelligence technology innovation and firm productivity: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104437
    View in Google Scholar
74. Zhang, H., & Dong, S. (2023). Digital transformation and firms’ total factor productivity: The role of internal control quality. Finance Research Letters, 57, 104231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104231
    View in Google Scholar
75. Zhang, L., Ye, Y., Meng, Z., Ma, N., & Wu, C. (2024a). Enterprise digital transformation, dynamic capabilities, and ESG performance: Based on data from listed Chinese companies. Journal of Global Information Management, 32(1), 1–20. http://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.335905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.335905
    View in Google Scholar
76. Zhang, X., Miao, L., Mu, G., & Wu, K.-S. (2024b). Concave and convex effects of ESG performance on corporate sustainable development: Evidence from China. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(2), 595–636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2972
    View in Google Scholar
77. Zhang, Y. J., Meng, Z. Z., & Song. Y. (2023). Digital transformation and metal enterprise value: Evidence from China. Resources Policy, 87(Part B), 104326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104326
    View in Google Scholar
78. Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3371–3387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3089
    View in Google Scholar
79. Zhuo, C. F., & Chen, J. (2023). Can digital transformation overcome the enterprise innovation dilemma: Effect, mechanism and effective boundary. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122378
    View in Google Scholar