Impact of green fiscal policy on the collaborative reduction of  pollution and carbon emissions: Evidence from energy saving and emission reduction policy in China

Abstract

Research background: Since China is facing the dual challenges of environmental pollution and climate change, how to effectively deal with the collaborative reduction of pollution and carbon emissions (CRPCE) has become an important problem. Energy saving and emission reduction fiscal policy (ESER), as a green fiscal policy, plays an important role in solving China's environmental problems.

Purpose of the article: The aim of this study is to analyze the direct impacts, mechanisms and spatial spillover effects of the ESER policy on the CRPCE through theoretical and empirical analyses, thereby providing practical and feasible fiscal-related policy proposals for developing countries like China to achieve low-carbon development.

Methods: Difference-in-differences method (DID), spatial DID.

Findings & value added: Based on panel data from 274 Chinese cities, this study analyzes the impact of ESER policy on the CRPCE. The findings demonstrate that the ESER policy effectively enhances the CRPCE. The mechanism analysis demonstrates that the impact of the ESER policy is realized by promoting green technology innovation, improving energy efficiency, and increasing industrial structure upgrading. The heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that the ESER policy can be more effective in enhancing the CRPCE when it is implemented in northern, resource-based, and high fiscal self-sufficiency cities. The spatial analysis results suggest that ESER policy attenuates the CRPCE of neighboring cities. In addition, the co-implementation of the ESER policy and the innovation policy is more effective in enhancing the CRPCE, but cities are required to implement the innovation policy first. This study broadens the research perspective on the synergistic effects of green fiscal policy in reducing pollutant and carbon emissions, and offers a useful guide for other developing countries on green fiscal policy.

Keywords

green fiscal policy, collaborative reduction of pollution and carbon emissions, energy saving and emission reduction policy

References

1. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131
   View in Google Scholar
2. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829828
   View in Google Scholar
3. Bai, J., Lu, J., & Li, S. (2019). Fiscal pressure, tax competition and environmental pollution. Environmental and Resource Economics, 73(2), 431–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-0269-1
   View in Google Scholar
4. Bai, T., Xu, D., Yang, Q., Piroska, V. D., Dávid, L. D., & Zhu, K. (2023b). Paths to low-carbon development in China: The role of government environmental target constraints. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(4), 1139–1173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.034
   View in Google Scholar
5. Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355304772839588
   View in Google Scholar
6. Chang, K., Xue, C., Zhang, H., & Zeng, Y. (2022). The effects of green fiscal policies and R&D investment on a firm’s market value: New evidence from the renewable energy industry in China. Energy, 251, 123953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123953
   View in Google Scholar
7. Dinu, V., Dragoş, C. M., Mare, C., Dragoş, S. L., & Mare, R. (2024). Economic and institutional determinants of environmental health and sustainability: Spatial and nonlinear effects for a panel of worldwide countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(1), 195–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2915
   View in Google Scholar
8. Dong, Z., Xia, C., Fang, K., & Zhang, W. (2022). Effect of the carbon emissions trading policy on the co-benefits of carbon emissions reduction and air pollution control. Energy Policy, 165, 112998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112998
   View in Google Scholar
9. Du, Z., & Wang, Y. (2022). Does energy-saving and emission reduction policy affects carbon reduction performance? A quasi-experimental evidence in China. Applied Energy, 324, 119758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119758
   View in Google Scholar
10. Elshamy, H. M., & Ahmed, K. I. S. (2017). Green fiscal reforms, environment and sustainable development. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 1(1), 48–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33094/8.2017.11.48.52
    View in Google Scholar
11. Fan, F., & Zhang, X. (2021). Transformation effect of resource-based cities based on PSM-DID model: An empirical analysis from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 91, 106648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106648
    View in Google Scholar
12. Fan, H., & Liang, C. (2023). The pollutant and carbon emissions reduction synergistic effect of energy fiscal policy: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104446
    View in Google Scholar
13. Fang, G., Chen, G., Yang, K., Yin, W., & Tian, L. (2023). Can green tax policy promote China’s energy transformation?—A nonlinear analysis from production and consumption perspectives. Energy, 269, 126818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126818
    View in Google Scholar
14. Feldman, M. P., & Kelley, M. R. (2006). The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior. Research Policy, 35(10), 1509–1521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.019
    View in Google Scholar
15. Feng, S., Zhang, R., & Li, G. (2022). Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 61, 70–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.02.008
    View in Google Scholar
16. Goodman-Bacon, A. (2021). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 254–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014
    View in Google Scholar
17. Gramkow, C., & Anger-Kraavi, A. (2018). Could fiscal policies induce green innovation in developing countries? The case of Brazilian manufacturing sectors. Climate Policy, 18(2), 246–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1277683
    View in Google Scholar
18. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
    View in Google Scholar
19. Guliyev, H. (2020). Determining the spatial effects of COVID-19 using the spatial panel data model. Spatial Statistics, 38, 100443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2020.100443
    View in Google Scholar
20. Guo, Q., Wang, Y., & Dong, X. (2022). Effects of smart city construction on energy saving and CO2 emission reduction: Evidence from China. Applied Energy, 313, 118879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118879
    View in Google Scholar
21. Heckert, M., & Mennis, J. (2012). The economic impact of greening urban vacant land: A spatial difference-in-differences analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 44(12), 3010–3027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a4595
    View in Google Scholar
22. Hu, J. (2023). Synergistic effect of pollution reduction and carbon emission mitigation in the digital economy. Journal of Environmental Management, 337, 117755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117755
    View in Google Scholar
23. Hu, Y., Ding, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, Q., & Pan, Z. (2023). Does carbon mitigation depend on energy fiscal policy or green investment?. Environmental Research Letters, 18(4), 045005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acc4df
    View in Google Scholar
24. Huang, H., Hong, J., Wang, X., Chang-Richards, A., Zhang, J., & Qiao, B. (2022). A spatiotemporal analysis of the driving forces behind the energy interactions of the Chinese economy: Evidence from static and dynamic perspectives. Energy, 239, 122104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122104
    View in Google Scholar
25. Jakubelskas, U., & Skvarciany, V. (2023). Circular economy practices as a tool for sustainable development in the context of renewable energy: What are the opportunities for the EU?. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(3), 833–859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.025
    View in Google Scholar
26. Ji, Z., Niu, D., Li, W., Wu, G., Yang, X., & Sun, L. (2022). Improving the energy efficiency of China: An analysis considering clean energy and fossil energy resources. Energy, 259, 124950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124950
    View in Google Scholar
27. Jiang, P., Khishgee, S., Alimujiang, A., & Dong, H. (2020). Cost-effective approaches for reducing carbon and air pollution emissions in the power industry in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 264, 110452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110452
    View in Google Scholar
28. Kuang, H., Akmal, Z., & Li, F. (2022). Measuring the effects of green technology innovations and renewable energy investment for reducing carbon emissions in China. Renewable Energy, 197, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.091
    View in Google Scholar
29. Li, B., & Dewan, H. (2017). Efficiency differences among China’s resource-based cities and their determinants. Resources Policy, 51, 31–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.11.003
    View in Google Scholar
30. Li, J., & Li, S. (2020). Energy investment, economic growth and carbon emissions in China—Empirical analysis based on spatial Durbin model. Energy Policy, 140, 111425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111425
    View in Google Scholar
31. Li, Z., Bai, T., & Tang, C. (2022). How does the low-carbon city pilot policy affect the synergistic governance efficiency of carbon and smog? Quasi-experimental evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 373, 133809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133809
    View in Google Scholar
32. Li, Z., Bai, T., Qian, J., & Wu, H. (2024). The digital revolution's environmental paradox: Exploring the synergistic effects of pollution and carbon reduction via industrial metamorphosis and displacement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 206, 123528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123528
    View in Google Scholar
33. Lin, B., & Zhu, J. (2019a). Impact of energy saving and emission reduction policy on urban sustainable development: Empirical evidence from China. Applied Energy, 239, 12–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.166
    View in Google Scholar
34. Lin, B., & Zhu, J. (2019b). Is the implementation of energy saving and emission reduction policy really effective in Chinese cities? A policy evaluation perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 1111–1120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.209
    View in Google Scholar
35. McKinnon, B., Harper, S., Kaufman, J. S., & Bergevin, Y. (2015). Removing user fees for facility-based delivery services: A difference-in-differences evaluation from ten sub-Saharan African countries. Health Policy and Planning, 30(4), 432–441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu027
    View in Google Scholar
36. Monasterolo, I., & Raberto, M. (2018). The EIRIN Flow-of-funds behavioural model of green fiscal policies and green sovereign bonds. Ecological Economics, 144, 228–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.029
    View in Google Scholar
37. Nam, K.-M., Waugh, C. J., Paltsev, S., Reilly, J. M., & Karplus, V. J. (2014). Synergy between pollution and carbon emissions control: Comparing China and the United States. Energy Economics, 46, 186–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.08.013
    View in Google Scholar
38. Nie, C., & Lee, C.-C. (2023). Synergy of pollution control and carbon reduction in China: Spatial–temporal characteristics, regional differences, and convergence. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 101, 107110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107110
    View in Google Scholar
39. Ogutu, H., El Archi, Y., & Dénes Dávid, L. (2023). Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 11-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.001
    View in Google Scholar
40. Sánchez García, J., & Galdeano Gómez, E. (2023). What drives the preferences for cleaner energy? Parametrizing the elasticities of environmental quality demand for greenhouse gases. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(2), 449–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.012
    View in Google Scholar
41. Sarkodie, S. A., & Strezov, V. (2019). Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Science of The Total Environment, 646, 862–871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.365
    View in Google Scholar
42. Scholtens, B. (2001). Borrowing green: Economic and environmental effects of energy fiscal policy in The Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 39(3), 425–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00235-X
    View in Google Scholar
43. Shao, S., Cheng, S., & Jia, R. (2023). Can low carbon policies achieve collaborative governance of air pollution? Evidence from China’s carbon emissions trading scheme pilot policy. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 103, 107286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107286
    View in Google Scholar
44. Smith, A. (2013). The climate bonus: Co-benefits of climate policy. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203109571
    View in Google Scholar
45. Tientao, A., Legros, D., & Pichery, M. C. (2016). Technology spillover and TFP growth: A spatial Durbin model. International Economics, 145, 21–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2015.04.004
    View in Google Scholar
46. Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498-509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
    View in Google Scholar
47. Usman, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Jahanger, A., & Ahmad, P. (2022). Pollution concern during globalization mode in financially resource-rich countries: Do financial development, natural resources, and renewable energy consumption matter?. Renewable Energy, 183, 90–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.067
    View in Google Scholar
48. Wang, P., Zhao, S., Dai, T., Peng, K., Zhang, Q., Li, J., & Chen, W. Q. (2022). Regional disparities in steel production and restrictions to progress on global decarbonization: A cross-national analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, 112367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112367
    View in Google Scholar
49. Wang, X., Zhao, D., & Xu, Y. (2020). Threshold effect of industrial structure upgrading on water environment pollution in China. Journal of Coastal Research, 115(sp1), 518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2112/JCR-SI115-142.1
    View in Google Scholar
50. Wang, Z., & Qiu, S. (2021). Can “energy saving and emission reduction” demonstration city selection actually contribute to pollution abatement in China?. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1882–1902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.030
    View in Google Scholar
51. Wei, X., Tong, Q., Magill, I., Vithayasrichareon, P., & Betz, R. (2020). Evaluation of potential co-benefits of air pollution control and climate mitigation policies for China’s electricity sector. Energy Economics, 92, 104917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104917
    View in Google Scholar
52. Wu, J., Xia, Q., & Li, Z. (2022). Green innovation and enterprise green total factor productivity at a micro level: A perspective of technical distance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 344, 131070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131070
    View in Google Scholar
53. Wu, L., Sun, L., Qi, P., Ren, X., & Sun, X. (2021). Energy endowment, industrial structure upgrading, and CO2 emissions in China: Revisiting resource curse in the context of carbon emissions. Resources Policy, 74, 102329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102329
    View in Google Scholar
54. Xie, W., Sheng, P., & Guo, X. (2015). Coal, oil, or clean energy: Which contributes most to the low energy efficiency in China?. Utilities Policy, 35, 67–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2015.05.003
    View in Google Scholar
55. Xiong, Q., Zhao, W., Guo, X., Shu, T., Chen, F., Zheng, X., & Gong, Z. (2015). Dustfall heavy metal pollution during winter in North China. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 95(4), 548–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-015-1611-8
    View in Google Scholar
56. Xu, T., Kang, C., & Zhang, H. (2022). China’s efforts towards carbon neutrality: Does energy-saving and emission-reduction policy mitigate carbon emissions?. Journal of Environmental Management, 316, 115286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115286
    View in Google Scholar
57. Yan, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., & Li, K. (2020). Emissions trading system (ETS) implementation and its collaborative governance effects on air pollution: The China story. Energy Policy, 138, 111282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111282
    View in Google Scholar
58. Yang, L., Liu, L., Yan, K., Cai, C., & Geng, Y. (2023). “Carrot and stick”: Energy fiscal policy, upper echelons expertise, and the green mergers and acquisitions. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104650
    View in Google Scholar
59. Yi, H., Zhao, L., Qian, Y., Zhou, L., & Yang, P. (2022). How to achieve synergy between carbon dioxide mitigation and air pollution control? Evidence from China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 78, 103609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103609
    View in Google Scholar
60. Zhang, S., Worrell, E., & Crijns-Graus, W. (2015). Cutting air pollution by improving energy efficiency of China’s cement industry. Energy Procedia, 83, 10–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.12.191
    View in Google Scholar
61. Zhang, Z., & Li, Y. (2020). Coupling coordination and spatiotemporal dynamic evolution between urbanization and geological hazards–A case study from China. Science of The Total Environment, 728, 138825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138825
    View in Google Scholar
62. Zhang, Z., Zhou, Y., Zhao, N., Li, H., Tohniyaz, B., Mperejekumana, P., Hong, Q., Wu, R., Li, G., Sultan, M., Zayan, A. M. I., Cao, J., Ahmad, R., & Dong, R. (2021). Clean heating during winter season in Northern China: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 149, 111339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111339
    View in Google Scholar
63. Zhou, B., Zhao, H., Yu, J., He, T., & Liu, J. (2022). Does the growth of the digital economy boost the efficiency of synergistic carbon-haze governance? Evidence from China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 984591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.984591
    View in Google Scholar
64. Zhu, K., Zhou, Q., Cheng, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, T., Yan, X., Alimov, A., Farmanov, E., & Dávid, L. D. (2023). Regional sustainability: Pressures and responses of tourism economy and ecological environment in the Yangtze River basin, China. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 1148868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1148868
    View in Google Scholar