Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025)

Articles

Energy-agriculture market linkages: Asymmetric effects in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Published 30-03-2025

Francisco Jareño
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha

Marta Tolentino
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha

María del Valle Fernández
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha

Abstract

Research background: The study examines the impact of geopolitical tensions, in particular the Russia-Ukraine conflict, on agricultural commodity markets at a global level. The research focuses on the period from February 2021 to February 2024, a period characterized by significant economic instability due to the ongoing conflict. The research covers global agricultural commodity markets, focusing on three main categories: soft commodities, grains and livestock.

Purpose of the article: The purpose of this paper is to examine the asymmetric interactions between crude oil and gas prices and agricultural commodity yields from February 2021 to February 2024. The study aims to analyze these interactions on a global scale, encompassing the world markets for soft commodities, grains and livestock. The research aims to provide insights into how geopolitical tensions, in particular the Russia-Ukraine conflict, are affecting these global agricultural markets and their linkages to energy prices.

Methods: This study uses the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model to analyze the asymmetric interactions between crude oil and gas prices and agricultural commodity yields, capturing both short-run and long-run asymmetries. The study divides the sample period into three distinct sub-periods of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, allowing for a detailed examination of how energy price fluctuations affect agricultural commodities under different economic conditions.

Findings & value added: Our main findings are the following: (1) positive correlations with oil and gas prices for soft commodities and grains; (2) weaker but significant relationship for livestock; (3) short-term asymmetries are particularly pronounced during periods of high economic turbulence (e.g. Russia-Ukraine conflict); (4) grain and livestock yields show stronger responses to negative oil price shocks; (5) no long-run equilibrium relationship found by cointegration tests. The present paper is unique in combining the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model with a detailed analysis of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, providing unprecedented insights into the asymmetric impact of geopolitical tensions on agricultural commodity markets, which is essential for understanding market dynamics during crises.

Keywords

agricultural commodity markets, energy price changes, connectedness, economic crisis

PDF

References

  1. Abubakr, M., Karim, S., Hasan, M., Lucey, B. M., & Hoon, S. (2022). Nexus between oil shocks and agriculture commodities: Evidence from time and frequency domain. Energy Economics, 112, 106148.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Adekoya, O. B., Oliyide, J. A., Yaya, O. S., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2022). Does oil connect differently with prominent assets during war? Analysis of intra-day data during the Russia-Ukraine saga. Resources Policy, 77, 102728.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102728
  3. Aït-Youcef, C. (2019). How index investment impacts commodities: A story about the financialization of agricultural commodities. Economic Modelling, 80, 23–33.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.04.007
  4. Akyildirim, E., Cepni, O., Molnár, P., & Uddin, G. S. (2022). Connectedness of energy markets around the world during the COVID-19 pandemic. Energy Economics, 109, 105900.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105900
  5. Antonakakis, N., & Gabauer, D. (2017). Refined measures of dynamic connectedness based on TVP-VAR. Mpra, 78282.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Arize, A. C., Malindretos, J., & Igwe, E. U. (2017). Do exchange rate changes improve the trade balance: An asymmetric nonlinear cointegration approach. International Review of Economics & Finance, 49, 313–326.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.02.007
  7. Balcilar, M., Gabauer, D., & Umar, Z. (2021). Crude oil futures contracts and commodity markets: New evidence from a TVP-VAR extended joint connectedness approach. Resources Policy, 73, 102219.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102219
  8. Basu, S., & Ishihara, K. N. (2023). Multivariate time–frequency interactions of renewable and non-renewable energy markets with macroeconomic factors in India. Energy Systems.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-023-00617-9
  9. Benlagha, N., & Abdelmalek, W. (2024). Dynamic connectedness between energy and agricultural commodities: Insights from the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia–Ukraine conflict. Eurasian Economic Review, 14(3), 781–825.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-024-00279-7
  10. Cabrera, B. L., & Schulz, F. (2016). Volatility linkages between energy and agricultural commodity prices. Energy Economics, 54, 190–203.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.018
  11. Chevallier, J., & Ielpo, F. (2013). Volatility spillovers in commodity markets. Applied Economics Letters, 20(13), 1211–1227.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2013.799748
  12. Dahl, R. E., Oglend, A., & Yahya, M. (2019). Dynamics of volatility spillover in commodity markets: Linking crude oil to agriculture. Journal of Commodity Markets, 20, 100111.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2019.100111
  13. Delatte, A. L., & Lopez, C. (2013). Commodity and equity markets: Some stylized facts from a copula approach. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(12), 5346–5356.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.06.012
  14. Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2012). Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. International Journal of Forecasting, 28(1), 57–66.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006
  15. Diebold, F. X., & Yılmaz, K. (2014). On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. Journal of Econometrics, 182(1), 119–134.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.04.012
  16. Diebold, F. X., Liu, L., & Yilmaz, K. (2017). Commodity connectedness. NBER
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w23685
  17. Working Paper Series, 23685.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Du, X., & McPhail, L. L. (2012). Inside the black box: The price linkage and transmission between energy and agricultural markets. Energy Journal, 33(2), 171–194.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.33.2.8
  19. Fang, Y., & Shao, Z. (2022). The Russia-Ukraine conflict and volatility risk of commodity markets. Finance Research Letters, 50, 103264.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103264
  20. Farid, S., Kayani, G. M., Naeem, M. A., & Shahzad, S. J. H. (2021). Intraday volatility transmission among precious metals, energy and stocks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Resources Policy, 72, 102101.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102101
  21. Fiszeder, P., & Małecka, M. (2022). Forecasting volatility during the outbreak of Russian invasion of Ukraine: Application to commodities, stock indices, currencies, and cryptocurrencies. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17(4), 939–967.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.032
  22. Fowowe, B. (2016). Do oil prices drive agricultural commodity prices? Evidence from South Africa. Energy, 104, 149–157.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.101
  23. Gardebroek, C., & Hernandez, M.A., 2013. Do energy prices stimulate food price volatility? Examining volatility transmission between US oil, ethanol and corn markets. Energy Economics, 40, 119–129.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.06.013
  24. Harri, A., Nalley, L., & Hudson, D. (2009). The relationship between oil, exchange rates, and commodity prices. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 41(2), 501–510.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800002959
  25. Hau, L., Zhu, H., Huang, R., & Ma, X. (2020). Heterogeneous dependence between crude oil price volatility and China’s agriculture commodity futures: Evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression. Energy, 213, 118781.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118781
  26. Hung, N. T. (2021). Oil prices and agricultural commodity markets: Evidence from pre and during COVID-19 outbreak. Resources Policy, 73, 102236.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102236
  27. Inacio C.M.C., Kristoufek, L., & David, S.A. (2023). Assessing the impact of the Russia–Ukraine war on energy prices: A dynamic cross-correlation analysis. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 626, 129084.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.129084
  28. Jareño, F., González, M., Tolentino, M., & Sierra, K. (2020). Bitcoin and gold price returns: A quantile regression and NARDL analysis. Resources Policy, 67, 101666.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101666
  29. Jareño, F., Tolentino, M., González, M., & Oliver, A. (2019). Impact of changes in the level, slope and curvature of interest rates on U.S. sector returns: An asymmetric nonlinear cointegration approach. Economic Research, 32(1), 1275–1297.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1632726
  30. Jebabli, I., Kouaissah, N., & Arouri, M. (2022). Volatility spillovers between stock and energy markets during crises: A comparative assessment between the 2008 global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102363.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102363
  31. Kaltalioglu, M., & Soytas, U. (2011). Volatility spillover from oil to food and agricultural raw material markets. Modern Economy, 2, 71–76.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2011.22011
  32. Kang, S. H., McIver, R., & Yoon, S. M. (2017). Dynamic spillover effects among crude oil, precious metal, and agricultural commodity futures markets. Energy Economics, 62, 19–32.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.12.011
  33. Koirala, K. H., Mishra, A. K., D'Antoni, J. M., & Mehlhorn, J. E. (2015). Energy prices and agricultural commodity prices: Testing correlation using copulas method. Energy, 81, 430–436.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.055
  34. Lombardi, M. J., Osbat, C., & Schnatz, B. (2012). Global commodity cycles and linkages: A FAVAR approach. Empirical Economics, 43, 651–670.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0494-8
  35. Lovcha, Y., & Perez-Laborda, A. (2020). Dynamic frequency connectedness between oil and natural gas volatilities. Economic Modelling, 84, 181–189.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.04.008
  36. Mensi, W., Hammoudeh, S., & Kang, S. H. (2015). Precious metals, cereal, oil and stock market linkages and portfolio risk management: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Economic Modelling, 51, 340–358.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.005
  37. Naeem, M. A., Karim, S., Hasan, M., Lucey, B. M., & Kang, S. H. (2022). Nexus between oil shocks and agriculture commodities: Evidence from time and frequency domain. Energy Economics, 112, 106148.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106148
  38. Nagayev, R., Disli, M., Inghelbrecht, K., & Ng, A. (2016). On the dynamic links between commodities and Islamic equity. Energy Economics, 58, 125–140.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.06.011
  39. Natanelov, V., Alam, M. J., McKenzie, A. M., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2011). Is there co-movement of agricultural commodities futures prices and crude oil? Energy Policy, 39(9), 4971–4984.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.016
  40. Nazlioglu, S., & Soytas, U. (2011). World oil prices and agricultural commodity prices: Evidence from an emerging market. Energy Economics, 33(3), 488–496.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.11.012
  41. Nazlioglu, S., & Soytas, U. (2012). Oil price, agricultural commodity prices, and the dollar: A panel cointegration and causality analysis. Energy Economics, 34(4), 1098–1104.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.09.008
  42. Pal, D., & Mitra, S.K. (2019). Correlation dynamics of crude oil with agricultural commodities: A comparison between energy and food crops. Economic Modelling, 82, 453–466.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.05.017
  43. Panagiotidis, T., & Rutledge, E. (2007). Oil and gas markets in the UK: Evidence from a cointegrating approach. Energy Economics, 29(2), 329–347.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.10.013
  44. Pesaran, M., & Shin, M. (1999). An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Pesaran, M., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. (2001). Bound testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
  46. Qiu, C., Colson, G., Escalante, C., & Wetzstein, M. (2012). Considering macroeconomic indicators in the food before fuel nexus. Energy Economics, 34(6), 2021–2028.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.018
  47. Reboredo, J. C. (2012). Do food and oil prices co-move? Energy policy, 49, 456–467.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.035
  48. Roman, M., Górecka, A., & Domagała, J. (2020). The linkages between crude oil and food prices. Energies, 13(24), 6545.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246545
  49. Saad, G. (2023). The impact of the Russia–Ukraine war on the United States natural gas futures prices. Kybernetes, 53(10), 3430–3443.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2023-0138
  50. Sevillano, M.C., Jareño, F., López, R., & Esparcia, C. (2024). Connectedness between oil price shocks and US sector returns: Evidence from TVP-VAR and wavelet decomposition. Energy Economics, 131, 107398,
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107398
  51. Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. J., (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear framework. In W. C. Horrace & R. C. Sickles (Eds.). Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric methods and applications (pp. 281–314). New York: Springer, Science & Business Media.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9
  52. Si, D. K., Li, X. L., Xu, X., & Fang, Y. (2021). The risk spillover effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on energy sector: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 102, 105498.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105498
  53. Silvennoinen, A., & Thorp, S. (2013). Financialization, crisis and commodity correlation dynamics. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 24, 42–65.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2012.11.007
  54. Tiwari, A. K., Abakah, E. J. A., Adewuyi, A. O., & Lee, C. C. (2022). Quantile risk spillovers between energy and agricultural commodity markets: Evidence from pre and during COVID-19 outbreak. Energy Economics, 113, 106235.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106235
  55. Umar, Z., Aziz, S., & Tawil, D. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 induced panic on the return and volatility of precious metals. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 31, 100525.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100525
  56. Uribe, J. M., Guillen, M., & Mosquera-López, S. (2018). Uncovering the nonlinear predictive causality between natural gas and electricity prices. Energy Economics, 74, 904–916.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.025
  57. Wang, Y., Wu, C., & Yang, L. (2014). Oil price shocks and agricultural commodity prices. Energy Economics, 44, 22–35.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.03.016
  58. Wu, Y., Ren, W., Wan, J., & Liu, X. (2023). Time-frequency volatility connectedness between fossil energy and agricultural commodities: Comparing the COVID-19 pandemic with the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Finance Research Letters, 55, 103866.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103866
  59. Xing, X., Cong, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, X. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 and war in Ukraine on energy prices of oil and natural gas. Sustainability, 15(19), 14208.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914208
  60. Yang, Y., Zhao, L., Zhu, Y., Chen, L., Wang, G., & Wang, C. (2023). Spillovers from the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Research in International Business and Finance, 66, 102006.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102006
  61. Yip, P. S., Brooks, R., Do, H. X., & Nguyen, D. K. (2020). Dynamic volatility spillover effects between oil and agricultural products. International Review of Financial Analysis, 69, 101465.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101465
  62. Yu, T. H. E., Bessler, D. A., & Fuller, S. W. (2006). Cointegration and causality analysis of world vegetable oil and crude oil prices. In Annual meeting, American Agricultural Economics Association. Long Beach: AgEcon Search.
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Zhang Z., Lohr, L., Escalante, C., & Wetzstein, M. (2009). Ethanol, corn, and soybean price relations in a volatile vehicle-fuels market. Energies, 2(2), 320–339.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en20200320
  64. Zhang, H., Chen, J., & Shao, L. (2021). Dynamic spillovers between energy and stock markets and their implications in the context of COVID-19. International Review of Financial Analysis, 77, 101828.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101828
  65. Zhang, Q., & Reed, M. R. (2008). Examining the impact of the world. In Southern Agricultural Economics Association annual meetings. Dallas: AgEcon Search.
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Zhang, W., He, X., & Hamori, S. (2023). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia-Ukraine war on multiscale spillovers in green finance markets: Evidence from lower and higher order moments. International Review of Financial Analysis, 89, 102735.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102735
  67. Zhou, X., Enilov, M., & Parhi, M. (2024). Does oil spin the commodity wheel? Quantile connectedness with a common factor error structure across energy and agricultural markets. Energy Economics, 132, 107468.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107468
  68. Živkov, D., Manić, S., & Durašković, J. (2020). Short and long-term volatility transmission from oil to agricultural commodities–The robust quantile regression approach. Borsa Istanbul Review, 20, 11–25.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.10.008

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 320

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.