The impact of green finance on ESG: Evidence from the Chinese enterprises
Abstract
Research background: Existing works highlight the multifaceted nature of ESG and the wide range of factors that can influence and predict ESG standing. However, there is currently a lack of research on the impact of green finance pilots on corporate ESG. How to improve the ESG level of enterprises through green finance policies is an urgent topic to be studied.
Purpose of the article: Using samples of 1300 listed companies, this study constructs a multi-period difference-in-differences model to examine the impact and mechanisms of the green finance reform and innovation pilot zone (GFPZ) pilot policies on corporate ESG levels.
Methods: Multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) estimation.
Findings & value added: (1) GFPZ is positively associated with the ESG of listed companies, indicating that the pilot policies effectively facilitate the improvement of ESG. This conclusion withstands robustness tests. (2) The pilot policies of GFPZ enhance ESG by promoting green technological innovation and strengthening the stock liquidity of enterprises. (3) From a theoretical perspective, this paper contributes to the literature on green finance and corporate governance by establishing a clear causal link between place-based green finance policies and firm-level environmental, social, and governance factors. This expands the understanding of policy-driven ESG in developing economies. Technically, the paper demonstrates how financial infrastructure reforms can lead to measurable sustainability outcomes through innovation and market responses. Furthermore, the paper provides targeted, actionable recommendations for optimizing GFPZ design, offering valuable insights for policymakers and ESG-oriented investors alike. The study deepens the understanding of the role of green finance in sustainable development and presents a replicable policy model for other economies seeking to improve their corporate ESG levels.
Keywords
green finance policy, ESG, DID model
References
- Aboud, A., & Diab, A. (2018). The impact of social, environmental and corporate governance disclosures on firm value: Evidence from Egypt. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(4), 442–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-08-2017-0079
View in Google Scholar - Akomea-Frimpong, I., Adeabah, D., Ofosu, D., & Tenakwah, E. J. (2022). A review of studies on green finance of banks, research gaps and future directions. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(4), 1241–1264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1870202
View in Google Scholar - Arvidsson, S., & Dumay, J. (2022). Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 1091–1110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2937
View in Google Scholar - Chen, D., Hu, H., & Chang, C. P. (2023). Green finance, environment regulation, and industrial green transformation for corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(5), 2166–2181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2476
View in Google Scholar - Chen, Q., Ning, B., Pan, Y., & Xiao, J. (2022a). Green finance and outward foreign direct investment: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of green insurance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(3), 899–924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09750-w
View in Google Scholar - Chen, W., Zhu, Y., He, Z., & Yang, Y. (2022b). The effect of local government debt on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 73, 101760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101760
View in Google Scholar - Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (2021). Corporate stakeholders, corporate valuation and ESG. European Financial Management, 27(2), 196–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12299
View in Google Scholar - Dang, T. L., Moshirian, F., & Zhang, B. (2019). Liquidity shocks and institutional investors. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 184–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2018.12.005
View in Google Scholar - Deng, W., Kharuddin, S., & Ashhari, Z. M. (2024). Green finance transforms developed countries’ green growth: Mediating effect of clean technology innovation and threshold effect of environmental tax. Journal of Cleaner Production, 448, 141642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141642
View in Google Scholar - Fang, Y., & Shao, Z. (2022). Whether green finance can effectively moderate the green technology innovation effect of heterogeneous environmental regulation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063646
View in Google Scholar - Ferrell, A., Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 585–606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.12.003
View in Google Scholar - Fu, Q., Zhao, X., & Chang, C. P. (2023). Does ESG performance bring to enterprises’ green innovation? Yes, evidence from 118 countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(3), 795–832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.024
View in Google Scholar - Gao, W., & Liu, Z. (2023). Green credit and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 55, 103940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103940
View in Google Scholar - Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
View in Google Scholar - Guo, B., Hu, P., & Lin, J. (2024). The effect of digital infrastructure development on enterprise green transformation. International Review of Financial Analysis, 92, 103085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103085
View in Google Scholar - Hu, J., Li, J., Li, X., Liu, Y., Wang, W., & Zheng, L. (2021). Will green finance contribute to a green recovery? Evidence from green financial pilot zone in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 794195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.794195
View in Google Scholar - Huang, Y., Chen, C., Lei, L., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Impacts of green finance on green innovation: A spatial and nonlinear perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365, 132548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132548
View in Google Scholar - Irfan, M., Razzaq, A., Sharif, A., & Yang, X. (2022). Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation: Exploring regional policy intervention effects in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121882
View in Google Scholar - Khan, M. (2019). Corporate governance, ESG, and stock returns around the world. Financial Analysts Journal, 75(4), 103–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1654299
View in Google Scholar - Lee, C. C., Hussain, J., & Abass, Q. (2025). An integrated analysis of AI-driven green financing, subsidies, and knowledge to enhance CO2 reduction efficiency. Economic Analysis and Policy, 85, 675–693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2024.12.021
View in Google Scholar - Li, W., Zheng, M., Zhang, Y., & Cui, G. (2020). Green governance structure, ownership characteristics, and corporate financing constraints. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121008
View in Google Scholar - Lin, X. Y., Liu, J. Y., & Zhang, Y. J. (2024). Does corporate social responsibility affect stock liquidity? Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 60, 104854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104854
View in Google Scholar - Liu, S., & Wang, Y. (2023). Green innovation effect of pilot zones for green finance reform: Evidence of quasi natural experiment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122079
View in Google Scholar - Liu, X., & Nie, W. (2022). Study on the coupling coordination mechanism of green technology innovation, environmental regulation, and green finance. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(47), 71796–71809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20905-8
View in Google Scholar - Lv, C., Bian, B., Lee, C. C., & He, Z. (2021). Regional gap and the trend of green finance development in China. Energy Economics, 102, 105476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105476
View in Google Scholar - Ozili, P. K. (2022). Green finance research around the world: A review of literature. International Journal of Green Economics, 16(1), 56–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGE.2022.125554
View in Google Scholar - Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
View in Google Scholar - Qian, S., & Yu, W. (2024). Green finance and environmental, social, and governance performance. International Review of Economics & Finance, 89, 1185–1202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.08.017
View in Google Scholar - Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007
View in Google Scholar - Ren, X., Zeng, G., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Digital finance and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, 102019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102019
View in Google Scholar - Sadiq, M., Nonthapot, S., Mohamad, S., Chee Keong, O., Ehsanullah, S., & Iqbal, N. (2022). Does green finance matter for sustainable entrepreneurship and environmental corporate social responsibility during COVID-19?. China Finance Review International, 12(2), 317–333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-02-2021-0038
View in Google Scholar - Shen, H., Lin, H., Han, W., & Wu, H. (2023). ESG in China: A review of practice and research, and future research avenues. China Journal of Accounting Research, 16(4), 100325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100325
View in Google Scholar - Shi, J., Yu, C., Li, Y., & Wang, T. (2022). Does green financial policy affect debt-financing cost of heavy-polluting enterprises? An empirical evidence based on Chinese pilot zones for green finance reform and innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121678
View in Google Scholar - Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S&P 500 companies: An analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660–1680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0018
View in Google Scholar - Tan, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2022). The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers' environmental awareness. Technology in Society, 68, 101906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101906
View in Google Scholar - Tian, C., Li, X., Xiao, L., & Zhu, B. (2022). Exploring the impact of green credit policy on green transformation of heavy polluting industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 335, 130257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130257
View in Google Scholar - Wang, M. L. (2023). Effects of the green finance policy on the green innovation efficiency of the manufacturing industry: A difference-in-difference model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189, 122333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122333
View in Google Scholar - Wang, Q. J., Wang, H. J., & Chang, C. P. (2022). Environmental performance, green finance and green innovation: what's the long-run relationships among variables?. Energy Economics, 110, 106004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106004
View in Google Scholar - Wang, Y., & Zhi, Q. (2016). The role of green finance in environmental protection: Two aspects of market mechanism and policies. Energy Procedia, 104, 311–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.053
View in Google Scholar - Wang, Z., Chu, E., & Hao, Y. (2024). Towards sustainable development: How does ESG performance promotes corporate green transformation. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, 102982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102982
View in Google Scholar - Wen, H., Liu, Y., & Lee, C. C. (2024). How ESG performance affects maturity mismatches between investment and financing: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies. Research in International Business and Finance, 71, 102412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102412
View in Google Scholar - Xu, A., Zhu, Y., & Wang, W. (2023). Micro green technology innovation effects of green finance pilot policy—from the perspectives of action points and green value. Journal of Business Research, 159, 113724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113724
View in Google Scholar - Xu, J., Liu, F., & Shang, Y. (2021). R&D investment, ESG performance and green innovation performance: Evidence from China. Kybernetes, 50(3), 737–756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2019-0793
View in Google Scholar - Xue, Q., Wang, H., Ji, X., & Wei, J. (2023). Local government centralization and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China’s county-to-district reform. China Journal of Accounting Research, 16(3), 100314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100314
View in Google Scholar - Yan, C., Mao, Z., & Ho, K. C. (2022). Effect of green financial reform and innovation pilot zones on corporate investment efficiency. Energy Economics, 113, 106185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106185
View in Google Scholar - Yang, X., Xu, Y., Razzaq, A., Wu, D., Cao, J., & Ran, Q. (2024). Roadmap to achieving sustainable development: Does digital economy matter in industrial green transformation?. Sustainable Development, 32(3), 2583–2599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2781
View in Google Scholar - Yu, C. H., Wu, X., Zhang, D., Chen, S., & Zhao, J. (2021). Demand for green finance: Resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China. Energy Policy, 153, 112255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112255
View in Google Scholar - Yuan, Z., Lee, C. C., & He, Z. W. (2025). How does green finance improve food security? From the perspective of rural human capital. International Review of Economics & Finance, 99, 103981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103981
View in Google Scholar - Zhang, H., & Wei, S. (2024). Green finance improves enterprises’ environmental, social and governance performance: A two-dimensional perspective based on external financing capability and internal technological innovation. Plos One, 19(4), e0302198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302198
View in Google Scholar - Zhang, M., He, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, X., Sindakis, S., & Showkat, S. (2024). Stock liquidity and investment efficiency: Evidence from the new regulation of insider selling in China. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(2), 8563–8587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01431-5
View in Google Scholar - Zhang, Z., Wang, J., Feng, C., & Chen, X. (2023). Do pilot zones for green finance reform and innovation promote energy savings? Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 124, 106763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106763
View in Google Scholar - Zhao, X., & Cai, L. (2023). Digital transformation and corporate ESG: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104310
View in Google Scholar - Zheng, M., Feng, G. F., & Chang, C. P. (2023a). Is green finance capable of promoting renewable energy technology? Empirical investigation for 64 economies worldwide. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(2), 483–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.013
View in Google Scholar - Zheng, S., Zhang, Q., & Zhang, P. (2023b). Can customer concentration affect corporate ESG performance?. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104432
View in Google Scholar - Zhou, F., Wen, H., & Lee, C. C. (2022). Broadband infrastructure and export growth. Telecommunications Policy, 46(5), 102347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102347
View in Google Scholar