Energy consumption and savings behavior under the pressure of energy security, sustainability and cleaner energy transition: The case of Romania

Abstract

Research background: Romania is in a profound process of transformation of its energy sector, with sustainability, security, and alignment with the European Union standards as the main factors. The ability of consumers to make energy consumption more efficient and to improve their energy use habits is therefore a major input to strengthen the Romania and EU's energy independence and fight climate change.

Purpose of the article: In this article, the authors are studying the ability of Romanian citizens to make energy consumption more efficient, and also the direct and indirect effect on their real contribution to saving energy.

Methods: The data was gathered through a questionnaire and the respondents are citizens from Romanian households. The analysis was carried out through an econometric model by applying the PLS-SEM technique. The objective was to identify and investigate the elements that impact the contribution to saving energy of Romanian citizens.

Findings & value added: The findings of the article confirm the study hypotheses crafted in the literature review section and demonstrate that the real contribution to saving energy of Romanian citizens is directly caused by various determinants, such as: being aware and informed about energy saving processes, being responsible about the energy consumption, the choice of energy provider and devices and the social/ community influence. Identifying the independent variables with relevant influence on the citizens’ contribution to saving energy could help the stakeholders within the energy sector to implement measures that could help citizens use energy more efficiently and reduce environmental impacts. Studying the independent variables that have considerable influence on the citizens’ contribution at saving energy through their ability to make energy consumption more efficient could assist the stakeholders from the energy sector to outline and improve their capabilities in meeting the needs of the energy consumers of the future.

Keywords

energy consumption, energy market, Romania, changing behaviour, saving energy, energy transition

References

1. Amin, M. B., Asaduzzaman, M., Debnath, G. C., Rahaman, M. A., & Oláh, J. (2024). Effects of circular economy practices on sustainable firm performance of green garments. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(2), 637–682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2795
   View in Google Scholar
2. Andreou, A., Fragkos, P., Filippidou, F., Zisarou, E., Avgerinopoulos, G., Pietzcker, R., Hasse, R., & Rosemann, R. (2025). Evaluating the impact of lifestyle changes: A scenario-based analysis for Europe’s residential buildings sector. Environmental Research Communications, 7(3), 035013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/adb9d8
   View in Google Scholar
3. Arning, K., & Venghaus, S. (2024). Sustainable practices and household resilience: An empirical analysis of behaviour change in times of crises. Energy Efficiency, 17(8), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-024-10285-y
   View in Google Scholar
4. Astrachan, C. B., Patel, V. K., & Wanzenried, G. (2014). A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 116–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.12.002
   View in Google Scholar
5. Balcerzak, A. P., Uddin, G. S., Igliński, B., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2023). Global energy transition: From the main determinants to economic challenges. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(3), 597–608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.018
   View in Google Scholar
6. Balcerzak, A., Uddin, G. S., Dutta, A., Pietrzak, M. B., & Igliński, B. (2024). Energy mix management: A new look at the utilization of renewable sources from the perspective of the global energy transition. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(2), 379–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3158
   View in Google Scholar
7. Brown, A., Hampton, H., Foley, A., Del Rio, D. F., Lowans, C., & Caulfield, B. (2023). Understanding domestic consumer attitude and behaviour towards energy: A study on the Island of Ireland. Energy Policy, 181, 113693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113693
   View in Google Scholar
8. Carlson, K. D., & Herdman, A. O. (2012). Understanding the impact of convergent validity on research results. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 17–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110392383
   View in Google Scholar
9. Carrus, G., Tiberio, L., Mastandrea, S., Chokrai, P., Fritsche, I., Klöckner, C. A., & Panno, A. (2021). Psychological predictors of energy saving behaviour: A meta-analytic approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 648221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648221
   View in Google Scholar
10. Chan, S. H., & Lay, Y. F. (2018). Examining the reliability and validity of research instruments using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(2), 239–251. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1419092.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.239
    View in Google Scholar
11. Chen, F., Wang, W., Wang, Y., & Wu, Y. (2022). How two-child policy affects China's energy consumption: The mediating role of lifestyle. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 866324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.866324
    View in Google Scholar
12. Chovancová, J., Štofejová, L., Gavura, Š., Novotný, R., & Rigelský, M. (2024). Assessing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in EU member states-decomposition analysis. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Sustainability Issues, 11(3), 10–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2024.11.4(15)
    View in Google Scholar
13. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    View in Google Scholar
14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
    View in Google Scholar
15. Corbos, R. A., Bunea, O. I., & Jiroveanu, D. C. (2023). The effects of the energy crisis on the energy-saving behaviour of young people. Energy Strategy Reviews, 49, 101184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101184
    View in Google Scholar
16. Darby, S. (2021). The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. Retrieved from https://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/energy/downloads/smart-metering-report.pdf (12.03.2025).
    View in Google Scholar
17. Dahlbom, B. (2009). Changing energy behaviour: Guidelines for behavioural change programmes. IDAE.
    View in Google Scholar
18. Delcea, C., Oprea, S.-V., Dima, A. M., Domenteanu, A., Bara, A., & Cotfas, L.-A. (2024). Energy communities: Insights from scientific publications. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(3), 1101–1155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3137
    View in Google Scholar
19. Deng, N., Allison, J. J., Fang, H. J. et al. (2013). Using the bootstrap to establish statistical significance for relative validity comparisons among patient-reported outcome measures. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 11, 89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-89
    View in Google Scholar
20. Deo, K., & Prasad, A. (2024). Factors influencing green energy consumer behaviour in Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 460, 142609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142609
    View in Google Scholar
21. Dincă, V. M., Bogdan, A., Vasiliu, C., & Zamfir, F. (2021). The influence of Romanian mobile commerce companies on developing green innovation. Sustainability, 13(18), 10075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810075
    View in Google Scholar
22. Dincă, V. M., Busu, M., & Nagy-Bege, Z. (2022). Determinants with impact on Romanian consumers’ energy-saving habits. Energies, 15(11), 4080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15114080
    View in Google Scholar
23. Dincă, V. M., Moagăr-Poladian, S., Stamule, T., & Nistoreanu, P. (2023). The REPowerEU plan and the main challenges for the transition to renewable energy in Romania. Amfiteatru Economic, 25(64), 676–690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2023/64/676
    View in Google Scholar
24. Dinu, V. (2023). Clean, diversified, and affordable energy for the European Union in the context of the REPowerEU plan. Amfiteatru Economic, 25(64), 654–658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2023/64/654
    View in Google Scholar
25. dos Santos, S. I., da Silveira, D. S., da Costa, M. F., & de Freitas, H. M. S. (2024). Systematic review of sustainable energy consumption from consumer behaviour perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 203, 114736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114736
    View in Google Scholar
26. Drăgoi, A. E., Calanter, P., Gramaticu, M., Dumitrescu, A., & Aluculesei, A. C. (2023). The challenges for green energy in Romania under current energy crisis. Amfiteatru Economic, 25(64), 728–742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2023/64/728
    View in Google Scholar
27. Dubois, G., Sovacool, B., Aall, C., Nilsson, M., Barbier, C., Herrmann, A., Bruyère, S., Andersson, C., Skold, B., Nadaud, F., Dorner, F., Moberg, K. R., Ceron, J. P., Fischer, H., Amelung, D., Baltruszewicz, M., Fischer, J., Benevise, F., Louis, V. R., & Sauerborn, R. (2019). It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioural decisions are key to low-carbon futures. Energy Research & Social Science, 52, 144–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.001
    View in Google Scholar
28. Econmedia. (2025). Energy Ministry on compensation-capping and energy prices in 2025: The baseline scenario remains the extension of the current scheme. Retrieved from https://economedia.ro/ministerul-energiei-despre-compensare-plafonare-si-preturi-in-2025-scenariul-de-baza-ramane-prelungirea-actualei-sche me.html (03.03.2025).
    View in Google Scholar
29. Europa Libera. (2024). How much does the fire dome over Romania cost us? We have been buying imported energy almost every moment of the day since the heatwave began. Retrieved from https://romania.europalibera.org/a/cost-energie-canicula/33030869.html (03.09.2024).
    View in Google Scholar
30. European Commission. (2024). REPowerEU – 2 years on. Retrieved from https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/markets-and-consumers/actions-and-measur es-energy-prices/repowereu-2-years_en#main-content (06.09.2024).
    View in Google Scholar
31. European Council. (2021). Energy price rise since 2021. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ro/infographics/energy-prices-2021/ (30.11.2024).
    View in Google Scholar
32. European Council. (2022a). Where does the EU’s gas come from?. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ro/infographics/eu-gas-supply (05.11.2024).
    View in Google Scholar
33. European Council. (2022b). Energy prices and security of supply. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ro/policies/energy-prices-and-security-of-sup ply/ (06.12.2024).
    View in Google Scholar
34. European Council. (2024). How much gas have the EU countries stored?. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ro/infographics/gas-storage-capacity/ (11.02.2025).
    View in Google Scholar
35. European Parliament. (2023). Energy saving: EU action to reduce energy consumption. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20221 128STO58002/energy-saving-eu-action-to-reduce-energy-consumption (15.12.2024).
    View in Google Scholar
36. Fazey, I., Schäpke, N., Caniglia, G., Patterson, J., Hultman, J., van Mierlo, B., Säwe, F., Wiek, A., Wittmayer, J., Aldunce, P., Al Waer, H., Battacharya, N., Bradbury, H., Carmen, E., Colvin, J., Cvitanovic, C., D'Souza, M., Gopel, M., Goldstein, B., Hämäläinen, T., Harper, G., Henfry, T., Hodgson, A., Howden, M. S., Kerr, A., Klaes, M., Lyon, C., Midgley, G., Moser, S., Mukherjee, N., Müller, K., O'Brien, K., O'Connell, D. A., Olsson, P., Page, G., Reed, M. S., Searle, B., Silvestri, G., Spaiser, V., Strasser, T., Tschakert, P., Uribe-Calvo, N., Waddell, S., Rao-Williams, J., Wise, R., Wolstenholme, R., Woods, M., & Wyborn, C. (2018). Ten essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change research. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, 54–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.026
    View in Google Scholar
37. Fey, C. F., Hu, T., & Delios, A. (2023). The measurement and communication of effect sizes in management research. Management and Organization Review, 19(1), 176–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.2
    View in Google Scholar
38. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 18(1), 39–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
    View in Google Scholar
39. Gaspari,J., Antonini,E., Marchi, L., & Vodola, V. (2021). Energy transition at home: A survey on the data and practices that lead to a change in household energy behaviour. Sustainability, 13, 5268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095268
    View in Google Scholar
40. Hair Jr, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    View in Google Scholar
41. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
    View in Google Scholar
42. Hulland, J. (1999). Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 195–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7
    View in Google Scholar
43. Jaciow, M., Rudawska, E., Sagan, A., Tkaczyk, J., & Wolny, R. (2022). The influence of environmental awareness on responsible energy consumption—The case of households in Poland. Energies, 15, 5339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155339
    View in Google Scholar
44. Jakubelskas, U., & Skvarciany, V. (2023). Circular economy practices as a tool for sustainable development in the context of renewable energy: What are the opportunities for the EU?. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(3), 833–859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.025
    View in Google Scholar
45. Johnston, R., Jones, K., & Manley, D. (2018). Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: A cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1957–1976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0584-6
    View in Google Scholar
46. Korsavi, S. S., Azari, R., Iulo, L. D., & Mahdavi, M. (2025). Determinants of US residential energy consumption at national and state levels: Policy implications. Energy Policy, 202, 114594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114594
    View in Google Scholar
47. Kumar, P., Caggiano, H., Shwom, R., Felder, F. A., & Andrews, C. J. (2023). Saving from home! How income, efficiency, and curtailment behaviours shape energy consumption dynamics in US households?. Energy, 271, 126988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126988
    View in Google Scholar
48. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong, S. (2002). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 36, 611637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06
    View in Google Scholar
49. Mansor, R., & Sheau-Tingi, L. (2019). The psychological determinants of energy saving behaviour. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 620(1), 012006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/620/1/012006
    View in Google Scholar
50. Martiskainen, M. (2021). Affecting consumer behaviour on energy demand. Project Report. Retrieved from http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/21613 (28.01.2025).
    View in Google Scholar
51. Menard, S. (2001). Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. London: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983433
    View in Google Scholar
52. Mehmetoglu, M. (2015). VAF: Stata module to compute mediation effect in SEM, Statistical Software Components, S458119. Boston College Department of Economics.
    View in Google Scholar
53. Mohanty, P. K., Patro, A., Harindranath, R. M., Kumar, N. S., Panda, D. K., & Dubey, R. (2021). Perceived government initiatives: Scale development, validation and impact on consumers' pro-environmental behaviour. Energy Policy, 158, 112534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112534
    View in Google Scholar
54. Nihal, A., Areche, F. O., Araujo, V. G. o S., & Ober, J. (2024). Synergistic evaluation of energy security and environmental sustainability in BRICS geo-political entities: An integrated index framework. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(3), 793–839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3088
    View in Google Scholar
55. Park, E., & Kwon, S. J. (2017). What motivations drive sustainable energy-saving behaviour?: An examination in South Korea. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79, 494–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.150
    View in Google Scholar
56. Pillan, M., Costa, F., & Caiola, V. (2023). How could people and communities contribute to the energy transition? Conceptual maps to inform, orient, and inspire design actions and education. Sustainability, 15, 14600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914600
    View in Google Scholar
57. Rausser, G., Strielkowski, W., & Mentel, G. (2023). Consumer attitudes toward energy reduction and changing energy consumption behaviours. Energies, 16(3), 1478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031478
    View in Google Scholar
58. Shen, P., & Yang, B. (2020). Projecting Texas energy use for residential sector under future climate and urbanization scenarios: A bottom-up method based on twenty-year regional energy use data. Energy, 193(C), 116694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116694
    View in Google Scholar
59. Sohre, A., & Schubert, I. (2022). The how and what of bottom-up governance to change household energy consumption behaviour. Energy Research & Social Science, 89, 102570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102570
    View in Google Scholar
60. Syed, S., Acquaye, A., Khalfan, M. M., Obuobisa-Darko, T., & Yamoah, F. A. (2024). Decoding sustainable consumption behaviour: A systematic review of theories and models and provision of a guidance framework. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 23(6), 200232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2024.200232
    View in Google Scholar
61. Tran, L. N., Cai, G., & Gao, W. (2023). Determinants and approaches of household energy consumption: A review. Energy Reports, 10, 1833–1850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.08.026
    View in Google Scholar
62. Truong, Y., Mccoll, R., & Kitchen, P. (2010). Uncovering the relationships between aspirations and luxury brand preference. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 19, 346–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10610421011068586
    View in Google Scholar
63. Visas, H., Rehan, R., Ul-Haq, J., Cheema, A. R., Khanum, S., & Hye, Q. M. A. (2023). Does tourism increase energy consumption in BRICS countries? Journal of Tourism Management Research, 10(1), 94–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/31.v10i1.3402
    View in Google Scholar
64. Vittinghoff, E., Glidden, D. V., Shiboski, S. C., & McCulloch, C. E. (2005). Regression methods in biostatistics: Linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models. New York: Springer Publishing Co.
    View in Google Scholar
65. Yin, H.-T., Wen, J., & Chang, C.-P. (2023). Going green with artificial intelligence: The path of technological change towards the renewable energy transition. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(4), 1059–1095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.032
    View in Google Scholar
66. Wang, J., Long, R., Chen, H., & Li, Q. (2022). How do parents and children promote each other? The impact of intergenerational learning on willingness to save energy. Energy Research & Social Science, 87, 102465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102465
    View in Google Scholar
67. Wijaya, D. I., & Kokchang, P. (2023) Factors influencing Generation Z’ pro-environmental behaviour towards Indonesia’s energy transition. Sustainability, 15, 13485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813485
    View in Google Scholar
68. Wolske, K. S., Gillingham, K. T., & Schultz, P. W. (2020). Peer influence on household energy behaviours. Nature Energy, 5(3), 202–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0541-9
    View in Google Scholar
69. Wu, Z., Yang, C., Zheng, R., & He, Z. (2024). An innovative analytical framework for energy consumption behaviour: A study based on beijing households. Journal of Environmental Management, 370, 122683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122683
    View in Google Scholar