Res publica digitalis: The uneven digital transformation of the European public sector and the impact of policy disparities on governance, service efficiency, and socioeconomic inclusion

Abstract

Research background: Digital transformation has become a central pillar of public sector modernisation in the European Union (EU), with initiatives focusing on digital infrastructure, e-government services, human capital development, and research and innovation. The EU’s long-term strategy for digital advancement is aimed at narrowing performance gaps and fostering inclusive progress among member states. However, regional disparities, stagnation in certain countries, and inconsistent investments in research and public services reveal the complex nature of digital convergence. The COVID-19 crisis further exposed structural weaknesses while simultaneously accelerating digital transitions across the EU.

Purpose of the article: This article aims to assess the development and inequality of public sector digitalisation across EU–27 countries. It focuses on identifying trends, regional shifts, and performance dynamics based on multidimensional evaluation. The study seeks to determine whether digital convergence is taking place, which countries are leading or lagging, and what policy implications emerge from the observed trajectories.

Methods: The research employs a multi-method approach combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and the Preference Ranking Organisation Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) method, Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient analysis, k-means clustering with PCA transformation, sensitivity analysis, and scenario modelling. A total of 24 criteria reflecting the digital maturity of the public sector, such as broadband access, digital skills, e-government services, and research and development (R&D) activity, were used. This comprehensive framework enables robust comparisons of performance levels, structural inequalities, and resilience to weight variations in composite indicators.

Findings & value added: The analysis reveals a measurable decline in digital inequality within the EU, as shown by a steady reduction in the Gini coefficient over time. Countries like Austria, Cyprus, and Croatia demonstrated significant upward mobility, driven by strategic investment and consistent policy support. Conversely, countries such as Romania and Belgium experienced relative decline due to stagnation in innovation and public service quality. Sensitivity testing confirmed the robustness of the applied model, while scenario analysis highlighted the transformative potential of targeted interventions. The value added of this research lies in its integrated analytical framework, which not only maps digital progress but also identifies structural challenges and policy leverage points essential for achieving a more cohesive digital Europe.

Keywords

digital transformation, policy disparities, public sector, technological innovation, digital inequality

References

1. Addo, A. (2022). Information technology and public administration modernization in a developing country: Pursuing paperless clearance at Ghana customs. Information Systems Journal, 32(4), 819–855.
   View in Google Scholar
2. Adepoju, A. H., Gabriel, B. A., Eweje, A., & Hamza, O. (2023). A data governance framework for high-impact programs: Reducing redundancy and enhancing data quality at scale. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 4(6), 1141–1154.
   View in Google Scholar
3. Adepoju, N. P. A., Sule, N. a. K., Ikwuanusi, N. U. F., Azubuike, N. C., & Odionu, N. C. S. (2024). Enterprise architecture principles for higher education: Bridging technology and stakeholder goals. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(12), 2997–3009.
   View in Google Scholar
4. Ahmadzai, Z., Rayi, I., & Mirwais, L. (2023). Challenges in implementing digital technology to enhance public administration efficiency in a metropolitan city. Journal Social Civilecial, 1(2), 71–84.
   View in Google Scholar
5. Akram, M., & Zafar, F. (2020). Hybrid soft computing models applied to graph theory (Vol. 380). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   View in Google Scholar
6. Albadvi, A. (2004). Formulating national information technology strategies: A preference ranking model using PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 290–296.
   View in Google Scholar
7. Al-Besher, A., & Kumar, K. (2022). Use of artificial intelligence to enhance e-government services. Measurement: Sensors, 24, 100484.
   View in Google Scholar
8. Aristovnik, A., Ravselj, D., & Murko, E. (2024). Decoding the digital landscape: An empirically validated model for assessing digitalisation across public administration levels. Administrative Sciences, 14(3), 41.
   View in Google Scholar
9. Aristovnik, A., Ravselj, D., & Murko, E. (2025). From development to deployment of a digital assessment software in public administration: Insights from Slovenia. Governance and Public Management, 55–77.
   View in Google Scholar
10. Arranz, C. F. A., Arroyabe, M .F., Arranz, N., & Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2023). Digitalisation dynamics in SMEs: An approach from systems dynamics and artificial intelligence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122880.
    View in Google Scholar
11. Bakare, O. A., Achumie, G. O., & Okeke, N. I. (2024). The impact of administrative efficiency on SME growth and sustainability. Open Access Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 8(1), 126–138.
    View in Google Scholar
12. Balaji, K. (2025). E-Government and E-Governance: Driving digital transformation in public administration. Public Governance Practices in the Age of AI, 23–44.
    View in Google Scholar
13. Banerjee, M. (2020). An exploratory study of online equity: Differential levels of technological access and technological efficacy among underserved and underrepresented student populations in higher education. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 16, 93–122.
    View in Google Scholar
14. Barcevicius, E., Cibaite, G., Codagnone, C., Gineikyte, V., Klimaviciute, L., Liva, G., Matulevis, L., Misuraca, G., & Vanini, I. (2019). Exploring digital government transformation in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
    View in Google Scholar
15. Bodo, B., & Janssen, H. (2022). Maintaining trust in a technologized public sector. Policy and Society, 41(3), 414–429.
    View in Google Scholar
16. Bocean, C. G., & Vărzaru, A. A. (2023). EU countries’ digital transformation, economic performance, and sustainability analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 875.
    View in Google Scholar
17. Bozkurt, Y., Rossmann, A., Pervez, Z., & Romzan, N. (2025). Assessing data governance models for smart cities: Benchmarking data governance models on the basis of European urban requirements. Sustainable Cities and Society, 130, 106528.
    View in Google Scholar
18. Bruno, G., Diglio, A., Piccolo, C., & Pipicelli, E. (2023). A reduced composite indicator for digital divide measurement at the regional level: An application to the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122461.
    View in Google Scholar
19. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross‐sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663.
    View in Google Scholar
20. Byeongsun, A. (2024) What changes over time? Planning history and institutional change from a policy design perspective. European Planning Studies, 32(12), 2535–2554.
    View in Google Scholar
21. Capestro, M., Rizzo, C., Kliestik, T., Peluso, A. M., & Pino, G. (2024). Enabling digital technologies adoption in industrial districts: The key role of trust and knowledge sharing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 123003.
    View in Google Scholar
22. Carstens, A. G., & Nilekani, N. (2024). Finternet: the financial system for the future. Basel: Bank for International Settlements, Monetary and Economic Department.
    View in Google Scholar
23. Casula, M. (2022). Implementing the transformative innovation policy in the European Union: how does transformative change occur in member states? European Planning Studies, 30(11), 2178–2204.
    View in Google Scholar
24. Cejkova, T. (2019). Impact of brexit on corporate taxes in the European Union. Financial Law Review, 15(3), 38–52.
    View in Google Scholar
25. Chari, S. G. (2024). Bridging gaps, building futures: Tackling socio-economic disparities through education and technology. London Journal of Research In Humanities and Social Sciences, 24(16), 1–12. https://journalspress.uk/index.php/LJRHSS/article/view/1122.
    View in Google Scholar
26. Chatterjee, S. (2020). Factors impacting behavioral intention of users to adopt IoT in India: From security and privacy perspective. International Journal of Information Security and Privacy, 14(4), 92–112.
    View in Google Scholar
27. Christopoulos, S., Horvath, B., & Kull, M. (2012). Advancing the governance of cross‐sectoral policies for sustainable development: A metagovernance perspective. Public Administration and Development, 32(3), 305–323.
    View in Google Scholar
28. Codagnone, C., Liva, G., Gunderson, L., & Misuraca, G. (2021). Europe’s digital decade and autonomy. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
    View in Google Scholar
29. Cone, L., Brøgger, K., Berghmans, M., Decuypere, M., Forschler, A., Grimaldi, E., Hartong, S., Hillman, T., Ideland, M., Landri, P., vad de Oudeweetering, K., Player-Koro, C., Rensfeldt, A.B., Ronnberg, Taglietti, D., & Vanermen, L. (2022). Pandemic acceleration: COVID-19 and the emergency digitalisation of European education. European Educational Research Journal, 21(5), 845–868.
    View in Google Scholar
30. Corboș, R.-A., O.-I., Bunea, I., & Moncea, M.-I. (2023). Best practices and lessons learned from digital transformation processes in public administrations of six European countries. In Proceedings of the 17th international management conference (pp. 522–535). Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies.
    View in Google Scholar
31. Crăciun, A. F., Țăran, A. M., Noja, G. G., Pirtea, M. G., & Răcătăian, R. I. (2023). Advanced modelling of the interplay between public governance and digital transformation: New empirical evidence from Structural Equation Modelling and Gaussian and Mixed-Markov graphical mModels. Mathematics, 11(5), 1168.
    View in Google Scholar
32. Czegledi, O., Beaucousin, S., Caballero-Julia, D., & Campillo, P. (2023). Digitalization in trail running: Digital tools as sustainable outdoor infrastructure. Sustainability, 15(14), 11085.
    View in Google Scholar
33. Darvishi, K., Liu, L., & Lim, S. (2022). Navigating the nexus: Legal and economic implications of emerging technologies. Law and Economics, 16(3), 172–186.
    View in Google Scholar
34. Di Giulio, M., & Vecchi, G. (2021). Implementing digitalisation in the public sector. technologies, agency, and governance. Public Policy and Administration, 38(2), 133–158.
    View in Google Scholar
35. Djatmiko, G. H., Sinaga, O., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2025). Digital transformation and social inclusion in public services: A qualitative analysis of e-government adoption for marginalized communities in sustainable governance. Sustainability, 17(7), 2908.
    View in Google Scholar
36. Dormann, M., Hinz, S., & Wittmann, E. (2017). Improving school administration through information technology? How digitalisation changes the bureaucratic features of public school administration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(2), 275–290.
    View in Google Scholar
37. Eger, L., & Zizka, M. (2024). Industry 4.0, digital transformation and human resource management: Emerging themes and research trends in the context of the Visegrad countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(3), 1021–1065.
    View in Google Scholar
38. Elkington, J. (2007). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51.
    View in Google Scholar
39. Engin, Z., & Treleaven, P. (2019). Algorithmic government: Automating public services and supporting civil servants in using data science technologies. Computer Journal, 62(3), 448–460.
    View in Google Scholar
40. Esposito, M., Akbar, Y., & Campbell, F.X. (2025). Digitalization in emerging economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
41. European Commission. (2022). 2030 Europe’s digital decade: Digital targets for 2030. European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy /priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/europes-digital-decade-digital-target s-2030_en.​
    View in Google Scholar
42. Fersch, B., Noe, E. B., Thuesen, A. A., & Langer, B. (2025). The rural risk of digital exclusion: A case study of municipal digital health and social care services in Denmark. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 7, 100537.
    View in Google Scholar
43. Fura, B., Karasek, A., & Hysa, B. (2025). Statistical assessment of digital transformation in European Union countries under sustainable development goal 9. Quality & Quantity, 59, 937–972.
    View in Google Scholar
44. Georgescu, M. R., Lungu, A. E., Bogoslov, I. A., & Stoica, E. A. (2023). European efficiency or ineffciency in economic growth through digital transformation. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 70(SI), 19–31.
    View in Google Scholar
45. Gherghin, C. A. (2025). Public policies for the digitalization of public services in the European Union: From foundations to contemporary challenges. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 67, 528–539.
    View in Google Scholar
46. Gilbert, M. R., & Masucci, M. (2020). Defining the geographic and policy dynamics of the digital divide. Handbook of the Changing World Language Map, 3653–3671.
    View in Google Scholar
47. GovTech Lab Lithuania. (2021). About GovTech lab. GovTech Lab Lithuania.​ Retrieved from https://govtechlab.lt.
    View in Google Scholar
48. Gozdziewska-Nowicka, A., Modrzynska, J., & Modrzynski, P. (2020). Teleworking and remote work in local government administration management in Poland. European Research Studies Journal, 23(2), 1027–1043.
    View in Google Scholar
49. Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2020). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organisational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197.
    View in Google Scholar
50. Hanisch, M., Goldsby, C. M., Fabian, N. E., & Oehmichen, J. (2023). Digital governance: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 162, 113777.
    View in Google Scholar
51. Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024). Digitally-induced change in the public sector: A systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1963–1987.
    View in Google Scholar
52. He, H. (2018). Research on prediction of internet public opinion based on grey system theory and fuzzy neural network. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 35(1), 325–332.
    View in Google Scholar
53. Hodapp, D., & Hanelt, A. (2022). Interoperability in the era of digital innovation: An information systems research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 37(4), 407–427.
    View in Google Scholar
54. Hoekstra, M., Van Veenstra, A. F., & Bharosa, N. (2023). Success factors and barriers of GovTech ecosystems: A case study of GovTech ecosystems in the Netherlands and Lithuania. In Proceedings of the 24th annual international conference on digital government research (pp. 280–288). ACM Digital Library.
    View in Google Scholar
55. Horvathova, J., & Mokrisova, M. (2024). The use of the Data Envelopment Analysis–Malmquist approach to measure the performance of digital transformation in EU countries. Economies, 12(11), 291.
    View in Google Scholar
56. Hunady, J., Pisar, P., Khawaja, S., & Qureshi, F. H. (2024). The digital transformation of European Union countries before and during COVID-19. Business Systems Research Journal, 15(1), 22–45.
    View in Google Scholar
57. Ikaka, B. F., Echadu, M. O., Igbang, V. O., & Etta, Q. M. (2025). Digital workflows systems and administrative efficiency of non-academic staff in the University of Calabar, Nigeria. Journal of Public Administration, Policy and Governance Research, 3(1), 1–14.
    View in Google Scholar
58. Ionescu, R. (2025). Adopting cloud computing and big data analytics to enhance public sector transparency and accountability through artificial intelligence. Nuvern Machine Learning Reviews, 2(1), 1–18.
    View in Google Scholar
59. Jarke, J. (2020). Co-creating digital public services for an ageing society. Cham: Springer.
    View in Google Scholar
60. Jencova, S., Vasanicova, P., & Miskufova, M. (2023). Multidimensional evaluation of EU and Slovakia in the context of digital transformation. Central European Business Review, 12(1), 65–95.
    View in Google Scholar
61. Jiao, H., Wang, T., Libaers, D., Yang, J., & Hu, L. (2025). The relationship between digital technologies and innovation: A review, critique, and research agenda. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(1), 100638.
    View in Google Scholar
62. Jonasikova, D., & Konecny, V. (2024). Research of individual logistics performance index indicators in European union countries. Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum, 18(1), 121–133.
    View in Google Scholar
63. Kahn, T., Baron, A., & Vieyra, J. C. (2018). Digital technologies for transparency in public investment: New tools to empower citizens and governments. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0001418.
    View in Google Scholar
64. Kickbusch, I., Piselli, D., Agrawal, A., Balicer, R., Banner, O., Adelhardt, M., Capobianco, E., Fabian, C., Gill, A.S., Lupton, D., Medhora, R.P., Ndili, N., Rys, A., Sambuli, N., Settle, D., Swaminathan, S., Morales, J.V., Wolpert, M., Wyckoff, A.W., Xue, L., Bytyqi, A., Franz, C., Gray, W., Holly, L., Neumann, M., Panda, L., Smith, R.D., Stevens, E.A.G., Wong, B. L. H. (2021). The Lancet and Financial Times Commission on governing health futures 2030: Growing up in a digital world. Lancet, 398(10312), 1727–1776.
    View in Google Scholar
65. Kliestik, T., Kral, P., Bugaj, M., & Durana, P. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence of things systems, multisensory immersive extended reality technologies, and algorithmic big data simulation and modelling tools in digital twin industrial metaverse. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(2), 429–461.
    View in Google Scholar
66. Koeswayo, P. S., Handoyo, S., & Abdul Hasyir, D. (2024). Investigating the relationship between public governance and the corruption perception index. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2342513.
    View in Google Scholar
67. Kosikova, M., & Matovcikova, D. (2024). The impact of digital quality of life on artificial intelligence development: A case study using the DQL and AIRI indexes. Ekonomicko-Manazerske Spektrum, 18(2), 24–37.
    View in Google Scholar
68. Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). Environmental sustainability within attaining sustainable development goals: The role of digitalisation and the transport sector. Sustainability, 15(14), 11282.
    View in Google Scholar
69. Latorcai, C. J., Strausz, P., & Csedo, Z. (2025). Impact of institutional change programs on digital and sustainable public sector governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 38(5), 610–626.
    View in Google Scholar
70. Latupeirissa, J. J. P., Dewi, N. L. Y., Prayana, I. K. R., Srikandi, M. B., Ramadiansyah, S. A., & Pramana, I. B. G. A. Y. (2024). Transforming public service delivery: A comprehensive review of digitization initiatives. Sustainability, 16(7), 2818.
    View in Google Scholar
71. Lindquist, E. A. (2022). The digital era and public sector reforms: Transformation or new tools for competing values? Canadian Public Administration, 65(3), 547–568.
    View in Google Scholar
72. Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., Poinsatte-Jones, K., & Florin, M. V. (2018). Governance strategies for a sustainable digital world. Sustainability, 10(2), 440.
    View in Google Scholar
73. Lnenicka, M., Luterek, M., & Majo, L. T. (2024). Analysis of e-government and digital society indicators over the years: a comparative study of the EU member states. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 26(5), 560–582.
    View in Google Scholar
74. Lopez Potes, M., Barbero, M., Vandenbroucke, D., & Vancauwenberghe, G. (2019). The role of spatial data infrastructures in the digital government transformation of public administrations. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
    View in Google Scholar
75. Mackey, T. K., & Cuomo, R. E. (2020). An interdisciplinary review of digital technologies to facilitate anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in medicines procurement. Global Health Action, 13(1), 1695241.
    View in Google Scholar
76. Małkowska, A., Urbaniec, M., & Kosała, M. (2021). The impact of digital transformation on European countries: Insights from a comparative analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(2), 325–355.
    View in Google Scholar
77. Manoharan, A. P., Melitski, J., & Holzer, M. (2023). Digital governance: An assessment of performance and best practices. Public Organization Review, 23(1), 265–283.
    View in Google Scholar
78. Marti, L., & Puertas, R. (2023). Analysis of European competitiveness based on its innovative capacity and digitalization level. Technology in Society, 72, 102206.
    View in Google Scholar
79. Milakovich, M. E. (2021). Digital governance: Applying advanced technologies to improve public service. London: Routledge.
    View in Google Scholar
80. Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic. (2020). Moje daně portal. ADISSPR.MFR. Retrieved from https://adisspr.mfcr.cz/pmd/home.
    View in Google Scholar
81. Mugellini, G., Della Bella, S., Colagrossi, M., Isenring, G. L., & Killias, M. (2021). Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(2), e1173.
    View in Google Scholar
82. Musa, H., Kristofik, P., Medzihorsky, J., & Kliestik. T. (2024). The development of firm size distribution-Evidence from four Central European countries. International Review of Economics & Finance, 91, 98–110.
    View in Google Scholar
83. Mutangili, S. K. (2024). The impact of public procurement law on supply chain performance. Journal of Procurement & Supply Chain, 8(1), 72–85.
    View in Google Scholar
84. Mutungi, F., Baguma, R., Janowski, T., & University Krems, Austria, D. (2019). Towards digital anti-corruption typology for public service delivery. In Y. Chen, F. Salem & A. Zuiderwijk (Eds.). Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on digital government research (pp. 484–494). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
    View in Google Scholar
85. Nadoleanu, G., Staiculescu, A. R., & Bran, E. (2022). The multifaceted challenges of the digital transformation: Creating a sustainable society. Postmodern Openings, 13(1), 300–316.
    View in Google Scholar
86. Neto, J. R., Fugueiredo, C., Gabriel, B. C., & Valente, R. (2024). Factors for innovation ecosystem frameworks: Comprehensive organizational aspects for evolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 203, 123383.
    View in Google Scholar
87. Obelovska, K., Abziatov, A., Doroshenko, A., Dronyuk, I., Liskevych, O., & Liskevych, R. (2025). Analysis of digital skills and infrastructure in EU countries based on DESI 2024 data. Future Internet, 17(6), 225.
    View in Google Scholar
88. Ocicka, B., Rogowski, W., & Turek, J. (2022). Industry 4.0 technologies as enablers of sustainability risk management. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law, 21(4), 727–740.
    View in Google Scholar
89. Ogunleye, O. S. (2023). Using artificial intelligence to enhance E-Government services delivery through data science and machine learning. In Z. Mahmood (Ed.). Advances in electronic government, digital divide, and regional development book series (pp. 1–28). London: IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
    View in Google Scholar
90. Okon, S. U. (2024). Enhancing transparency and accountability in public service through open data initiatives: Insights from Estonia and policy recommendations for the United States. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 24(9), 328–349.
    View in Google Scholar
91. Oloyede, A. A., Faruk, N., Noma, M., Tebepah, E., & Augustine, K. N. (2023). Measuring the impact of the digital economy in developing countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon, 9(7), e17654.
    View in Google Scholar
92. Omar, N. J. M., Qasim, N. H., Kawad, R. T., & Kalenychenko, R. (2024). The role of digitalisation in improving accountability and efficiency in public services. Revista Investigacion Operacional, 45(2), 203–24.
    View in Google Scholar
93. Phong, V. D. (2024). Archival science and the digital transformation in Vietnam. Baden: Nomos.
    View in Google Scholar
94. Pinto, H., Nogueira, C., & Vieira, G. (2023). Digitalisation landscape in the European Union: Statistical insights for a digital transformation. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 8(1), 20–38.
    View in Google Scholar
95. Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T.H. (2023). Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 41(6), 821–844.
    View in Google Scholar
96. Poudel, N. (2024). The impact of big data-driven artificial intelligence systems on public service delivery in cloud-oriented government infrastructures. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Cloud Computing Systems, 8(11), 13–25.
    View in Google Scholar
97. Prasetyo, B., Sumartono, E., Suherman, S., Mulyaningsih, M., & Kusnadi, E. (2024). Citizen-Centric approaches to e-government for improving public service delivery. Journal of Academic Science, 1(7), 858–867.
    View in Google Scholar
98. Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91–97.
    View in Google Scholar
99. Profiroiu, C. M., Negoita, C. I., & Costea, A. V. (2023). Digitalization of public administration in EU member states in times of crisis: The contributions of the national recovery and resilience plans. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(2), 336–352.
    View in Google Scholar
100. Purnamasari, R., Hasanudin, A. I., Zulfikar, R., & Yazid, H. (2025). Technological infrastructure and financial resource availability in enhancing public services and government performance: The role of digital innovation adoption in Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101621.
     View in Google Scholar
101. Radulescu, C. V., Manescu, C. O., Popescu, M. L., & Burlacu, S. (2023). Sustainable development in public administration: Research, practice, and education. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 12(4), 27–27.
     View in Google Scholar
102. Rane, N., Achari, A., & Choudhary, S. (2023). Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) as a powerful tool for sustainable development: Effective applications of AHP, FAHP, TOPSIS, ELECTRE, and VIKOR in sustainability. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 5(4), 2654–2670.
     View in Google Scholar
103. Remeikiene, R., Gaspareniene, L., & Cesiulyte, J. (2025). Work organization and social responsibility on digital platforms: Challenges and best practices in Europe. Journal of Business Sectors, 3(1), 25–40.
     View in Google Scholar
104. Sauvagerd, M., Mayer. M., & Hartmann, M. (2024). Digital platforms in the agricultural sector: Dynamics of oligopolistic platformisation. Big Data Society, 11(4), 1–16.
     View in Google Scholar
105. Scarlat, C., Stanciulescu, G. D., & Panduru, D. A. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic as accelerator: Opportunity for digital acceleration. Journal of Internet and e-Business Studies, 2022, 1–14.
     View in Google Scholar
106. Semradova Zvolankova, S., & Krajcik, V. (2024). Digital maturity of Czech SMEs concerning the demographic characteristics of entrepreneurs and enterprises. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(4), 1363–1404.
     View in Google Scholar
107. Sikder, A. S., Ahmed, S., & Islam, J. (2023). Leveraging information technology for green IT and sustainable development: An analysis of environmental sustainability, energy efficiency, and carbon footprint reduction initiatives: IT for green IT and sustainable development. International Journal of Imminent Science & Technology, 1(1), 48–63.
     View in Google Scholar
108. Sivarajah, U., Kumar, S., Kumar, V., Chatterjee, S., & Li, J. (2024). A study on big data analytics and innovation: From technological and business cycle perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 202, 123328.
     View in Google Scholar
109. Stankovic, J. J., Marjanovic, I., Drezgic, S., & Popovic, Z. (2021). The digital competitiveness of European countries: A multiple-criteria approach. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(2), 117–134.
     View in Google Scholar
110. Strielkowski, W., Kalyugina, S., Fursov, V., & Mukhoryanova, O. (2023). Improving the system of indicators for assessing the effectiveness of modern regional innovation systems. Economies, 11(9), 228.
     View in Google Scholar
111. Sugiyanto, H. (2025). The evolution of public sector leadership in the era of digital transformation. International Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(1), 23–30.
     View in Google Scholar
112. Svobodova, Z., Vecerova, V., Redlichova, R., & Somerlikova, K. (2024). Evaluation of the performance of SMEs in the context of regional development. Journal of Business Sectors, 2(1), 47–60.
     View in Google Scholar
113. Traitler, H., Watzke, H. J., & Saguy, I. S. (2011). Reinventing R&D in an open innovation ecosystem. Journal of Food Science, 76(2), R62–R68.
     View in Google Scholar
114. Turek, T., Dziembek, D., & Hernes, M. (2021). The use of IT solutions offered in the public cloud to reduce the city’s carbon footprint. Energies, 14(19), 6389.
     View in Google Scholar
115. Tutak, M., & Brodny, J. (2022). Renewable energy consumption in economic sectors in the EU-27. The impact on economics, environment and conventional energy sources. A 20-year perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, 131076.
     View in Google Scholar
116. UNDESA (2024). United Nations e-government survey 2024. New York: United Nations.
     View in Google Scholar
117. Van Deursen, A.J., & van Dijk, J.A. (2013). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526.
     View in Google Scholar
118. Van Hoang, T. (2024). Impact of integrated artificial intelligence and internet of things technologies on smart city transformation. Journal of Technical Education Science, 19(Special Issue 01), 64–73.
     View in Google Scholar
119. Virglerova, Z., Homolka, L., Lazanyi, K., & Kliestik, T. (2017). Key determinants of the quality of business environment of SMEs in the Czech Republic. E & M Ekonomie a Management, 20(2), 87–101.
     View in Google Scholar
120. Waara, A. (2025). Examining digital government maturity models: Evaluating the inclusion of citizens. Administrative Sciences, 15(3), 73.
     View in Google Scholar
121. Wang, D., & Shao, X. (2024). Research on the impact of digital transformation on the production efficiency of manufacturing enterprises: Institution-based analysis of the threshold effect. International Review of Economics & Finance, 91, 883–897.
     View in Google Scholar
122. Yao, Y. (2022). A review of the comprehensive application of big data, artificial intelligence, and internet of things technologies in smart cities. Journal of Computational Methods in Engineering Applications, 2(1), 1–10.
     View in Google Scholar
123. Zeverte-Rivza, S., Girdziute, L., Parlinska, A., Rivza, P., Novikova, A., & Gudele, I. (2023). Digitalisation in bioeconomy in the Baltic States and Poland. Sustainability, 15(17), 13237.
     View in Google Scholar
124. Zhang, L., & Zhang, X. (2025). Impact of digital government construction on the intelligent transformation of enterprises: Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 210, 123787.
     View in Google Scholar
125. Zhou, W., Lyu, Z., & Chen, S. (2024). Mechanisms influencing the digital transformation performance of local governments: Evidence from China. Systems, 12(1), 30.
     View in Google Scholar
126. Zvarikova, K., Gajanova, L., & Horak, J. (2024). Exploring CSR performance as a proxy for competitive advantage across sectors in the Central European countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(3), 991–1020.
     View in Google Scholar