The algorithmic management of job loss and creation in the enterprise generative, multimodal, and agentic artificial intelligence economy
Abstract
Research background: Enterprise generative, multimodal, and agentic artificial intelligence (AI) technologies facilitate transformative productivity and workforce adaptation gains in innovative organizations, redesigns autonomous team and talent management for workforce and job rotation planning, skill development, and career paths, handle context-specific collaborative business processes, workflows, and decision-making, and augment multi-agent system scaling for labor productivity and operational efficiency, redefining agile and adaptive organizational performance in dynamic business environments, driving interoperable big employee data and strategic decision management, and creating strategic fluidity and synchronized digital labor for sustainable business value. Connected and interoperable agentic AI systems can carry out multistep tasks autonomously, reduce operational costs and unemployment rates, and manage big data-based organizational workflows and management pipelines, driving business value creation and productivity gains, reallocating digital labor, and redefining employee experiences and labor markets in terms of job loss and creation by upskilling and retraining. AI labor impacts predictions are based on multimodal data and labor force productivity modeling in relation to how job and skill creation can affect economic conditions and workforce development, while driving business model transformation.
Purpose of the article: We aim to clarify whether enterprise generative, multimodal, and agentic AI-based task automation and machine performance complements technology-driven employment changes and algorithmic efficiency, resulting in workforce reduction and competitive pressures due to economic incentives in terms of how i) deep reinforcement learning algorithms can build digital agentic workflows for autonomous Internet of Things (IoT) sensor-based industrial robotic machines, leading to employment relation, personnel retention and recruitment, work reorganization, and labor productivity optimization, engaged productive staff flexibility and autonomy, and job performance and satisfaction, ii) how task automation and augmentation disrupt labor markets and reshape workforce for either more layoffs or more new hires, predicting both increased or lower wages, high or decreased unemployment, and job creation or elimination, and iii) how computer vision-based task automation and augmentation technologies redesign business-critical workflows and workforce upskilling processes across collaborative enterprise IoT and sluggish hiring environments for task automation and augmentation, streamlining personalized human resource support, resource efficiency, and enterprise productivity, driving economic growth.
Methods: A quantitative literature review of ProQuest, Scopus, and the Web of Science databases was carried out and the most relevant research published between 2024 and 2025 was identified and analyzed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and the web-based Shiny app were harnessed for search results and screening. Dimensions (for bibliometric mapping) and VOSviewer (for layout algorithms) were the deployed data visualization tools. Evidence synthesis screening software and reference and review management tools leveraged included AMSTAR, CADIMA, DistillerSR, JBI SUMARI, MMAT, Nested Knowledge, PICO Portal, and SRDR+.
Findings & value added: The main value added derived from the systematic literature review is that enterprise generative, multimodal, and agentic AI system applicability correlates with occupational task operation completion, wage, employment prospects, and education, driving business choices and transformation, labor markets, and economic growth. The benefits for theory and current state of the art are that enterprise generative, multimodal, and agentic AI-based flexible work arrangements and increased employee tracking for organizational and workforce performance can improve job quality while reducing pay inequity, staff absenteeism, job turnover, and widespread unemployment, affecting labor markets and resulting in long-term business values and outcomes. Occupational AI and computer vision technologies impact predictions with regard to work activity automation and augmentation in terms of job loss, labor productivity, and wage raising or lowering. Policy implications reveal that employee productivity and performance tools entail job displacement and creation, requiring emerging workforce reskilling or upskilling for talent attraction, retention, progression, and promotion across structural labor market transformation.
Keywords
job creation, business cycle approach, artificial intelligence, generative, China dual-carbon , agentic
References
- Acemoglu, D. (2025). The simple macroeconomics of AI. Economic Policy, 40(121), 13–58.
View in Google Scholar - Adiasto, K. (2024). SustAInable employability: Sustainable employability in the age of generative artificial intelligence. Group & Organization Management, 49(6), 1338–1348.
View in Google Scholar - Al-khatib, A. W., Al-Shboul, M. A., & Khattab, M. (2024). How can generative artificial intelligence improve digital supply chain performance in manufacturing firms? Technology in Society, 78, 102676.
View in Google Scholar - Amankwah-Amoah, J., Abdalla, S., Mogaji, E., Elbanna, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024). The impending disruption of creative industries by generative AI: Opportunities, challenges, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 79, 102759.
View in Google Scholar - Andronie, M., Lăzăroiu, G., Iatagan, M., Uță, C., Ștefănescu, R., & Cocoșatu, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms… Electronics, 10, 2497.
View in Google Scholar - Andronie, M., Lăzăroiu, G., Iatagan, M., Hurloiu, I., Ștefănescu, R., Dijmărescu, A., et al. (2023a). Big data management algorithms… ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12, 35.
View in Google Scholar - Andronie, M., Lăzăroiu, G., Karabolevski, O. L., Ștefănescu, R., Hurloiu, I., Dijmărescu, A., et al. (2023b). Remote big data management tools… Electronics, 12, 22.
View in Google Scholar - Baek, C., Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2024). “ChatGPT seems too good to be true”: College students’ use and perceptions of generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100294.
View in Google Scholar - Balcerzak, A. P., Škapa, A., Gedeon, T., & Lăzăroiu, G. (2025a). AI proliferation: From organizational change to long-term, massive unemployment? Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(4), 1223–1231.
View in Google Scholar - Balcerzak, A. P., Zinecker, M., & Mičánek, J. (2025b). The impact of artificial intelligence on task performance and decision-making: Empirical evidence on Generation Z. Human Technology, 21(3), 620–639.
View in Google Scholar - Boone, T., Fahimnia, B., Ganeshan, R., Herold, D. M., & Sanders, N. R. (2025). Generative AI: Opportunities, challenges, and research directions for supply chain resilience. Transportation Research Part E, 199, 104135.
View in Google Scholar - Brown, O., Davison, R. M., Decker, S., Ellis, D. A., Faulconbridge, J., … Hibbert, P. (2024). Theory-driven perspectives on generative artificial intelligence in business and management. British Journal of Management, 35(1), 3–23.
View in Google Scholar - Capraro, V., Lentsch, A., Acemoglu, D., Akgun, S., Akhmedova, A., … Viale, R. (2024). The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policymaking. PNAS Nexus, 3(6), 191.
View in Google Scholar - Chin, T., Li, Z., Huang, L., & Li, X. (2025). How artificial intelligence promotes new quality productive forces of firms: A dynamic capability view. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 216, 124128.
View in Google Scholar - Chowdhury, S., Budhwar, P., & Wood, G. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in business: Towards a strategic human resource management framework. British Journal of Management, 35(4), 1680–1691.
View in Google Scholar - Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., & Gasevic, D. (2024). Teachers’ generative AI self-efficacy, valuing, and integration at work. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100333.
View in Google Scholar - Dahlin, E. (2024). Who says artificial intelligence is stealing our jobs? Socius, 10.
View in Google Scholar - Dorta-González, P., López-Puig, A. J., Dorta-González, M. I., & González-Betancor, S. M. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence usage by researchers at work… Telematics and Informatics, 94, 102187.
View in Google Scholar - Dwivedi, Y., Pandey, N., Currie, W., & Micu, A. (2024). Leveraging ChatGPT and other generative AI-based applications in the hospitality and tourism industry… International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(1), 1–12.
View in Google Scholar - Dwivedi, Y. K. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in entrepreneurial education and practice… International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 21, 82.
View in Google Scholar - Ferraro, C., Demsar, V., Sands, S., Restrepo, M., & Campbell, C. (2024). The paradoxes of generative AI-enabled customer service: A guide for managers. Business Horizons, 67(5), 549–559.
View in Google Scholar - Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2024). Generative AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66, 111–126.
View in Google Scholar - Fleischmann, K. (2024a). Making the case for introducing generative artificial intelligence into design curricula. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 23, 187–207.
View in Google Scholar - Fleischmann, K. (2024b). Generative artificial intelligence in graphic design education: A student perspective. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 50(1), 1–17.
View in Google Scholar - Fosso Wamba, S., Guthrie, C., Queiroz, M. M., & Minner, S. (2023). ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence: An exploratory study… International Journal of Production Research, 62(16), 5676–5696.
View in Google Scholar - French, A. M., & Shim, J. P. (2024). From artificial intelligence to augmented intelligence… Information Systems Frontiers, 27, 1345–1366.
View in Google Scholar - Giraldi, L., Rossi, L., & Rudawska, E. (2024). Evaluating public sector employee perceptions towards AI and generative AI integration. Journal of Information Science.
View in Google Scholar - Hui, X., Reshef, O., & Zhou, L. (2024). The short-term effects of generative artificial intelligence on employment… Organization Science, 35(6), 1977–1989.
View in Google Scholar - Hurlburt, G. F. (2024). Artificial intelligence, the workforce and educational realities. Computer, 57(10), 94–98.
View in Google Scholar - Jackson, I., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Namdar, J. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in supply chain and operations management… International Journal of Production Research, 62(17), 6120–6145.
View in Google Scholar - Kanbach, D. K., Heiduk, L., Blueher, G., Schreiter, M., & Lahmann, A. (2024). The GenAI is out of the bottle… Review of Managerial Science, 18, 1189–1220.
View in Google Scholar - Kim, J. J. H., Srivatsa, A. V., Nahass, G. R., Rusanov, T., Hwang, S., … Dai, Y. (2024). Generative AI can effectively manipulate data. AI Ethics, 5, 4515–4529.
View in Google Scholar - Kovbasiuk, A., Triantoro, T., Przegalińska, A., Sowa, K., Ciechanowski, L., & Gloor, P. (2025). The personality profile of early generative AI adopters: A big five perspective. Central European Management Journal, 33(2), 252–264.
View in Google Scholar - Kshetri, N., Dwivedi, Y. K., Davenport, T. H., & Panteli, N. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in marketing: Applications, opportunities, challenges, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 75, 102716.
View in Google Scholar - Lăzăroiu, G., Andronie, M., Iatagan, M., Geamănu, M., Ștefănescu, R., & Dijmărescu, I. (2022). Deep learning-assisted smart process planning… ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11, 277.
View in Google Scholar - Lăzăroiu, G., & Rogalska, E. (2023). How generative artificial intelligence technologies shape partial job displacement and labor productivity growth. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(3), 703–706.
View in Google Scholar - Li, J.-M., Wu, H.-Y., Zhang, R.-X., & Wu, T.-J. (2025). How employee–generative AI collaboration affects employees’ work and family outcomes? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 36(8), 1431–1457.
View in Google Scholar - Malik, A., Lirio, P., Budhwar, P., Nguyen, M., & Fauzi, M. A. (2025). Guest editorial: Artificial intelligence (AI) in the world of work… Personnel Review, 54(3), 781–799.
View in Google Scholar - Marimon, F., Mas-Machuca, M., & Akhmedova, A. (2024). Trusting in generative AI: Catalyst for employee performance and engagement in the workplace. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(11), 7076–7091.
View in Google Scholar - Nagy, M., Figura, M., Valaskova, K., & Lăzăroiu, G. (2025). Predictive maintenance algorithms, artificial intelligence digital twin technologies… Mathematics, 13(6), 981.
View in Google Scholar - Nagy, M., Lăzăroiu, G., & Valaskova, K. (2023). Machine intelligence and autonomous robotic technologies in the corporate context of SMEs… Applied Sciences, 13(3), 1681.
View in Google Scholar - Obschonka, M., Grégoire, D. A., Nikolaev, B., Ooms, F., Lévesque, M., Pollack, J. M., & Behrend, T. S. (2025). Artificial intelligence and entrepreneurship: A call for research to prospect and establish the scholarly AI frontiers. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 49(3), 620–641.
View in Google Scholar - Prasad Agrawal, K. (2023). Organizational sustainability of generative AI-driven optimization intelligence. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 65(3), 265–279.
View in Google Scholar - Rajaram, K., & Tinguely, P. N. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in small and medium enterprises: Navigating its promises and challenges. Business Horizons, 67(5), 629–648.
View in Google Scholar - Richards, D., Worden, D., Song, X. P., & Lavorel, S. (2024). Harnessing generative artificial intelligence to support nature-based solutions. People and Nature, 6(2), 882–893.
View in Google Scholar - Sabherwal, R., & Grover, V. (2024). The societal impacts of generative artificial intelligence: A balanced perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 25(1), 13–22.
View in Google Scholar - Simkute, A., Tankelevitch, L., Kewenig, V., Scott, A. E., Sellen, A., & Rintel, S. (2024). Ironies of generative AI: Understanding and mitigating productivity loss in human–AI interaction. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(5), 2898–2919.
View in Google Scholar - Teutloff, O., Einsiedler, J., Kässi, O., Braesemann, F., Mishkin, P., & Rio-Chanona, R. M. del. (2025). Winners and losers of generative AI: Early evidence of shifts in freelancer demand. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 235, 106845.
View in Google Scholar - Wang, X., & Wu, Y. C. (2024). Balancing innovation and regulation in the age of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Information Policy, 14, 385–416.
View in Google Scholar - Wang, S., & Zhang, H. (2025a). Promoting sustainable development goals through generative artificial intelligence in the digital supply chain… Sustainable Development, 33(1), 1231–1248.
View in Google Scholar - Wang, S., & Zhang, H. (2025b). Leveraging generative artificial intelligence for sustainable business model innovation in production systems. International Journal of Production Research, 63(18), 6732–6757.
View in Google Scholar - Wellbrock, C.-M. (2024). Generative AI and investigative journalism – An application of Baumol’s cost disease across mass communication sectors. Emerging Media, 2(4), 663–672.
View in Google Scholar - Wirtz, J., & Stock-Homburg, R. (2025). Generative AI meets service robots. Journal of Service Research, 28(4), 527–543.
View in Google Scholar - Wong, W. K. O. (2024). The sudden disruptive rise of generative artificial intelligence? Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100278.
View in Google Scholar - Yorks, L., & Jester, M. Y. (2024). Applying generative AI ethically in HRD practice. Human Resource Development International, 27(3), 410–427.
View in Google Scholar - Zarifhonarvar, A. (2024). Economics of ChatGPT: A labor market view on the occupational impact of artificial intelligence. Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, 3(2), 100–116.
View in Google Scholar - Zhang, C., & Zhang, H. (2025). The impact of generative AI on management innovation. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 44, 100767.
View in Google Scholar - Zhao, H., Yuan, B., & Song, Y. (2024). Employees’ perception of generative artificial intelligence and the dark side of work outcomes. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 61, 191–199.
View in Google Scholar - Zhou, E., & Lee, D. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and art. PNAS Nexus, 3(3), 052.
View in Google Scholar